Le veil - non
Author
Discussion

Soovy

Original Poster:

35,829 posts

299 months

Thursday 25th March 2010
quotequote all

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/f...


Fair play to Sarkozy??


Edited by Soovy on Thursday 25th March 13:36

Famous Graham

26,553 posts

253 months

Thursday 25th March 2010
quotequote all
I disagree. Simply because I don't feel it's right to ban any item of clothing. I can sympathise with the ideals behind it, but I can't endorse it.

Matt Evans

1,530 posts

202 months

Thursday 25th March 2010
quotequote all
Soovy said:
Fair play to Sarkozy??
Hard to say really. Whilst the article says how many Muslims are in France (and in turn relating to how many may be affected by the ban), it doesn't say how many people may want the ban in place.

Liszt

4,337 posts

298 months

Thursday 25th March 2010
quotequote all
Alright, who posted this on the comments?

Someone funny said:
This is an outrage!

What's next? Banning Ninja's from popping up in smoke clouds and climbing walls with those cool claw thingy's?

We must protest this! Ninja's are people too and its their cultural right to bear swords on their backs.

They also make great sushi I tell you.

Soovy

Original Poster:

35,829 posts

299 months

Thursday 25th March 2010
quotequote all


How long do you think it would be before I got arrested if I drove round London with a balaclava on?


Fuzzy Wuzzy

623 posts

218 months

Thursday 25th March 2010
quotequote all
Soovy said:
How long do you think it would be before I got arrested if I drove round London with a balaclava on?
Arrested for what?

Unless you also happened to be stark naked at the same time. laugh

Edited by Fuzzy Wuzzy on Thursday 25th March 13:45


Edited by Fuzzy Wuzzy on Thursday 25th March 13:45

Soovy

Original Poster:

35,829 posts

299 months

Thursday 25th March 2010
quotequote all
Famous Graham said:
Soovy said:
How long do you think it would be before I got arrested if I drove round London with a balaclava on?
You might well be pulled over relatively sharpish
BING!

But someone wearing a burkah won't.


That's racialism!

zac510

5,546 posts

234 months

Thursday 25th March 2010
quotequote all
This issue has been bashing around for at least a year or two.

I understand it's already illegal to wear a veil in public places like schools and hospitals?

Famous Graham

26,553 posts

253 months

Thursday 25th March 2010
quotequote all
Soovy said:
How long do you think it would be before I got arrested if I drove round London with a balaclava on?
That's a bit tenuous. For a start, balaclavas aren't banned. You might well be pulled over relatively sharpish but that would be because you looked suspicious rather than the item of clothing being proscribed.

For example, in the winter, I've regularly worn a balaclava whilst cycling, or walked up the street with a woolly hat and a scarf across my face. Nary a problem.

cloggy

4,959 posts

237 months

Thursday 25th March 2010
quotequote all
Be interesting to know how they are going to re-enforce it though.

pugwash4x4

7,671 posts

249 months

Thursday 25th March 2010
quotequote all
Famous Graham said:
I disagree. Simply because I don't feel it's right to ban any item of clothing. I can sympathise with the ideals behind it, but I can't endorse it.
whats the objection to banning an article of clothing?

TEKNOPUG

20,437 posts

233 months

Thursday 25th March 2010
quotequote all
Famous Graham said:
Soovy said:
How long do you think it would be before I got arrested if I drove round London with a balaclava on?
That's a bit tenuous. For a start, balaclavas aren't banned. You might well be pulled over relatively sharpish but that would be because you looked suspicious rather than the item of clothing being proscribed.

For example, in the winter, I've regularly worn a balaclava whilst cycling, or walked up the street with a woolly hat and a scarf across my face. Nary a problem.
Try doing it during a legal demonstration....

Fuzzy Wuzzy

623 posts

218 months

Thursday 25th March 2010
quotequote all
pugwash4x4 said:
Famous Graham said:
I disagree. Simply because I don't feel it's right to ban any item of clothing. I can sympathise with the ideals behind it, but I can't endorse it.
whats the objection to banning an article of clothing?
Exactly, there's nothing wrong with Big Brother wanting us to dress in a particular way.

Matt Evans

1,530 posts

202 months

Thursday 25th March 2010
quotequote all
cloggy said:
Be interesting to know how they are going to re-enforce it though.
I reckon putting a metal grid inside before pouring the concrete should do the trick.

Soovy

Original Poster:

35,829 posts

299 months

Thursday 25th March 2010
quotequote all


Law should be applied equally to all.


As stated by my friend below, if I drove round with a blalclava I'll get pulled over.

Your muslim with the burkah on won't.


dat iz racialist innit.


JuniorD

9,013 posts

251 months

Thursday 25th March 2010
quotequote all
Famous Graham said:
I disagree. Simply because I don't feel it's right to ban any item of clothing. I can sympathise with the ideals behind it, but I can't endorse it.
Same here. Banning items of clothing - where will it stop? Will wearing big sunglasses or scarves be next?

In fact, I would suggest that people should have the right to expressly hide their faces, for example if they had some facial disfigurement, or were having a really bad skin or makeup day, like his missus:





Famous Graham

26,553 posts

253 months

Thursday 25th March 2010
quotequote all
Post order's getting a bit screwy...

southendpier

6,184 posts

257 months

Thursday 25th March 2010
quotequote all
TEKNOPUG said:
Famous Graham said:
Soovy said:
How long do you think it would be before I got arrested if I drove round London with a balaclava on?
That's a bit tenuous. For a start, balaclavas aren't banned. You might well be pulled over relatively sharpish but that would be because you looked suspicious rather than the item of clothing being proscribed.

For example, in the winter, I've regularly worn a balaclava whilst cycling, or walked up the street with a woolly hat and a scarf across my face. Nary a problem.
Try doing it during a legal demonstration....
Interestingly the only people allowed to cover their faces in a legal deomonstration are the Bib.

Wossatalllahbaaht then?


Famous Graham

26,553 posts

253 months

Thursday 25th March 2010
quotequote all
TEKNOPUG said:
Famous Graham said:
Soovy said:
How long do you think it would be before I got arrested if I drove round London with a balaclava on?
That's a bit tenuous. For a start, balaclavas aren't banned. You might well be pulled over relatively sharpish but that would be because you looked suspicious rather than the item of clothing being proscribed.

For example, in the winter, I've regularly worn a balaclava whilst cycling, or walked up the street with a woolly hat and a scarf across my face. Nary a problem.
Try doing it during a legal demonstration....
Yes, and try wearing a crash helmet in a bank. That's my point to Soovy about looking suspicious. It's not just the item in question - it's one of many factors that might prompt a copper to think about taking a closer interest.

southendpier

6,184 posts

257 months

Thursday 25th March 2010
quotequote all
zac510 said:
This issue has been bashing around for at least a year or two.

I understand it's already illegal to wear a veil in public places like schools and hospitals?
And it must be in swimming pools/public baths too, never seen one there.