Discussion
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/f...
Fair play to Sarkozy??
Edited by Soovy on Thursday 25th March 13:36
Alright, who posted this on the comments?
Someone funny said:
This is an outrage!
What's next? Banning Ninja's from popping up in smoke clouds and climbing walls with those cool claw thingy's?
We must protest this! Ninja's are people too and its their cultural right to bear swords on their backs.
They also make great sushi I tell you.
What's next? Banning Ninja's from popping up in smoke clouds and climbing walls with those cool claw thingy's?
We must protest this! Ninja's are people too and its their cultural right to bear swords on their backs.
They also make great sushi I tell you.
Soovy said:
How long do you think it would be before I got arrested if I drove round London with a balaclava on?
Arrested for what?Unless you also happened to be stark naked at the same time.

Edited by Fuzzy Wuzzy on Thursday 25th March 13:45
Edited by Fuzzy Wuzzy on Thursday 25th March 13:45
Soovy said:
How long do you think it would be before I got arrested if I drove round London with a balaclava on?
That's a bit tenuous. For a start, balaclavas aren't banned. You might well be pulled over relatively sharpish but that would be because you looked suspicious rather than the item of clothing being proscribed.For example, in the winter, I've regularly worn a balaclava whilst cycling, or walked up the street with a woolly hat and a scarf across my face. Nary a problem.
Famous Graham said:
Soovy said:
How long do you think it would be before I got arrested if I drove round London with a balaclava on?
That's a bit tenuous. For a start, balaclavas aren't banned. You might well be pulled over relatively sharpish but that would be because you looked suspicious rather than the item of clothing being proscribed.For example, in the winter, I've regularly worn a balaclava whilst cycling, or walked up the street with a woolly hat and a scarf across my face. Nary a problem.
pugwash4x4 said:
Famous Graham said:
I disagree. Simply because I don't feel it's right to ban any item of clothing. I can sympathise with the ideals behind it, but I can't endorse it.
whats the objection to banning an article of clothing? Famous Graham said:
I disagree. Simply because I don't feel it's right to ban any item of clothing. I can sympathise with the ideals behind it, but I can't endorse it.
Same here. Banning items of clothing - where will it stop? Will wearing big sunglasses or scarves be next? In fact, I would suggest that people should have the right to expressly hide their faces, for example if they had some facial disfigurement, or were having a really bad skin or makeup day, like his missus:

TEKNOPUG said:
Famous Graham said:
Soovy said:
How long do you think it would be before I got arrested if I drove round London with a balaclava on?
That's a bit tenuous. For a start, balaclavas aren't banned. You might well be pulled over relatively sharpish but that would be because you looked suspicious rather than the item of clothing being proscribed.For example, in the winter, I've regularly worn a balaclava whilst cycling, or walked up the street with a woolly hat and a scarf across my face. Nary a problem.
Wossatalllahbaaht then?
TEKNOPUG said:
Famous Graham said:
Soovy said:
How long do you think it would be before I got arrested if I drove round London with a balaclava on?
That's a bit tenuous. For a start, balaclavas aren't banned. You might well be pulled over relatively sharpish but that would be because you looked suspicious rather than the item of clothing being proscribed.For example, in the winter, I've regularly worn a balaclava whilst cycling, or walked up the street with a woolly hat and a scarf across my face. Nary a problem.
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff



