Would you pay for online news content ?
Would you pay for online news content ?
Author
Discussion

anonymous-user

Original Poster:

84 months

Friday 26th March 2010
quotequote all
[redacted]

JagLover

46,786 posts

265 months

Friday 26th March 2010
quotequote all
Commercial news organisations seeking to charge for their websites in this country are rather screwed by the vast resources the BBC puts into its own website.

The only ones who can are those, like the Financial Times, which cover subjects not covered by the mainstream media.

hornetrider

63,161 posts

235 months

Friday 26th March 2010
quotequote all
No.

JMGS4

8,932 posts

300 months

Friday 26th March 2010
quotequote all
NO!! and once more NO!!

Muzzer

3,814 posts

251 months

Friday 26th March 2010
quotequote all
No. There'll always be someone offering the same for free.

amir_j

3,579 posts

231 months

Friday 26th March 2010
quotequote all
Nope

Tony*T3

20,911 posts

277 months

Friday 26th March 2010
quotequote all
No. These people are being really, really stupid. Terrible business decision IMHO. They believe 'their own press' way too much (which is really rather ironic isnt it?).

You cant give away free net newsprint/magazine content (look at the online car mags that never get off the ground) let alone get people to actually pay for content.

Terrible decision.


Halb

53,012 posts

213 months

Friday 26th March 2010
quotequote all
Never.

And 'unofficial' news?biggrin If it's not in the red heads it's not news?biggrin
I get 100% of all my news from free sites as it is now, and they are not the web versions of portable loo rolls.

TDIPLC

5,274 posts

238 months

Friday 26th March 2010
quotequote all
Not unless they provide me with value for my £1 that I can't get for free elsewhere.

Skipppy

1,136 posts

240 months

Friday 26th March 2010
quotequote all
If someone like the the sun charges for online content then that's great. I wouldn't wipe my arse with that paper.

Keep page 3 free though wink

Puggit

49,809 posts

278 months

Friday 26th March 2010
quotequote all
JagLover said:
Commercial news organisations seeking to charge for their websites in this country are rather screwed by the vast resources the BBC puts into its own website.

The only ones who can are those, like the Financial Times, which cover subjects not covered by the mainstream media.
Wot he says...

HOGEPH

5,249 posts

216 months

Friday 26th March 2010
quotequote all
Skipppy said:
If someone like the the sun charges for online content then that's great. I wouldn't wipe my arse with that paper.

Keep page 3 free though wink
Apparently, there are some nudey lady pictures available on the internet somewhere.

Targarama

14,786 posts

313 months

Friday 26th March 2010
quotequote all
JagLover said:
Commercial news organisations seeking to charge for their websites in this country are rather screwed by the vast resources the BBC puts into its own website.

The only ones who can are those, like the Financial Times, which cover subjects not covered by the mainstream media.
Am I the only one who thinks the BBC News site is lacking? Some things are covered well, but there are not timely updates compared to the other news suppliers, and the whole site is very last decade.

BOR

5,146 posts

285 months

Friday 26th March 2010
quotequote all
Even more worrying, if The Daily Mail start to charge, will it mean the end of News, Politics and Economics ?

Mclovin

1,679 posts

228 months

Friday 26th March 2010
quotequote all
we paying for bias online new content already....its called the bbc...

Mazda Baiter

37,069 posts

218 months

Friday 26th March 2010
quotequote all
No fking way. But then I might be rare in that I actually buy a newspaper. I still look at the websites though.

I would stop buying the paper if they put the charges on their website. A letter would be sent to them to let them know too.

condor

8,837 posts

278 months

Friday 26th March 2010
quotequote all
BOR said:
Even more worrying, if The Daily Mail start to charge, will it mean the end of News, Politics and Economics ?
The Daily Mail has the e.editions (an on-line copy of the paper) which it charges for at £50 a year. I'd expect that to be popular with ex-pats so they can keep up with UK events. I know when I've been abroad on hols and bought a day old copy of the paper it cost a lot!

Our local freebie paper also does the e.editions but doesn't charge.

MX7

7,902 posts

204 months

Friday 26th March 2010
quotequote all
JagLover said:
Commercial news organisations seeking to charge for their websites in this country are rather screwed by the vast resources the BBC puts into its own website.
If the BBC didn't exist, wouldn't people say the same about the likes of CNN and Reuters? I'm not sure that it's the BBC who are preventing news companies from charging, or whether it's just the nature of news on the internet.



tangent police

3,097 posts

206 months

Friday 26th March 2010
quotequote all
No.

If they start charging, their piggy bank will tell them exactly what the score is.

Even if they did start charging, there would be a warez version, etc.

Fittster

20,120 posts

243 months

Friday 26th March 2010
quotequote all
MX7 said:
JagLover said:
Commercial news organisations seeking to charge for their websites in this country are rather screwed by the vast resources the BBC puts into its own website.
If the BBC didn't exist, wouldn't people say the same about the likes of CNN and Reuters? I'm not sure that it's the BBC who are preventing news companies from charging, or whether it's just the nature of news on the internet.
The BBC (the state broadcaster) makes it very were difficult for commercial broadcasters to exist in the UK.