Bank offsets bonus tax with raid on staff pensions
Bank offsets bonus tax with raid on staff pensions
Author
Discussion

F i F

Original Poster:

48,801 posts

281 months

Monday 29th March 2010
quotequote all
Barclays raids pensions to offset bonuses tax
Daily Telegraph Philip Aldrick said:
A raid by Barclays on the pension benefits of 17,000 branch and other frontline staff has been used to offset the bonus tax for its high-earning investment bankers.

Details buried in the annual accounts show that the bank made a £371m profit last year from closing its UK final salary scheme to existing members. After a £150m "voluntary" top-up to help clear the deficit, the net profit from the move was £221m. The figure is almost exactly equivalent to the £225m bonus tax paid to cover the £2.2bn of awards to its 23,200 Barclays Capital staff.

The "one-off" profit is likely to infuriate branch workers, who balloted to strike over the removal of their benefits, especially as it matches the "one-off" bonus tax.

Barclays boss John Varley fought off the strike threat with a promise "to reinvest any one-off savings from the proposed changes into [reducing the deficit]". The £150m top-up is double the annual cash saving, as distinct from the £371m non-cash "curtailment gain", lifting total contributions last year to £525m.

Barclays plans to contribute just £290m next year, below the long-run average of £350m. "Potential additional voluntary contributions" may be made, the report states.

Pension top-ups are vital as the deficit has risen from £2.2bn to £4.8bn. Mr Varley, who received a £4.7m personal top-up last year, has said the existing arrangements are "untenable" due to rising costs.

A spokesman said: "The changes to the Barclays pension scheme were made before the end of 2009 and hence before any decisions were made regarding discretionary compensation or the [bonus] tax."
Regardless of the timing of any decisions and the coincidence that the amounts are similar in value, this surely will be perceived as a "where's my foot, take aim, fire!" moment for Barclays by the staff and others.

Frankly who can blame them.

Funk

27,701 posts

239 months

Monday 29th March 2010
quotequote all
Someone was always going to pay for Darling's bonus-pilfering, and it wasn't going to be those at the top of the tree who paid for it.

DSM2

3,624 posts

230 months

Monday 29th March 2010
quotequote all
F i F said:
Barclays raids pensions to offset bonuses tax
Daily Telegraph Philip Aldrick said:
A raid by Barclays on the pension benefits of 17,000 branch and other frontline staff has been used to offset the bonus tax for its high-earning investment bankers.

Details buried in the annual accounts show that the bank made a £371m profit last year from closing its UK final salary scheme to existing members. After a £150m "voluntary" top-up to help clear the deficit, the net profit from the move was £221m. The figure is almost exactly equivalent to the £225m bonus tax paid to cover the £2.2bn of awards to its 23,200 Barclays Capital staff.

The "one-off" profit is likely to infuriate branch workers, who balloted to strike over the removal of their benefits, especially as it matches the "one-off" bonus tax.

Barclays boss John Varley fought off the strike threat with a promise "to reinvest any one-off savings from the proposed changes into [reducing the deficit]". The £150m top-up is double the annual cash saving, as distinct from the £371m non-cash "curtailment gain", lifting total contributions last year to £525m.

Barclays plans to contribute just £290m next year, below the long-run average of £350m. "Potential additional voluntary contributions" may be made, the report states.

Pension top-ups are vital as the deficit has risen from £2.2bn to £4.8bn. Mr Varley, who received a £4.7m personal top-up last year, has said the existing arrangements are "untenable" due to rising costs.

A spokesman said: "The changes to the Barclays pension scheme were made before the end of 2009 and hence before any decisions were made regarding discretionary compensation or the [bonus] tax."
Regardless of the timing of any decisions and the coincidence that the amounts are similar in value, this surely will be perceived as a "where's my foot, take aim, fire!" moment for Barclays by the staff and others.

Frankly who can blame them.
Frankly, who gives a st?


Ponk

1,382 posts

222 months

Monday 29th March 2010
quotequote all
UK company in closing Final Salary Pension shocker!

Teppic

8,085 posts

287 months

Monday 29th March 2010
quotequote all
Funk said:
Someone was always going to pay for Darling's bonus-pilfering, and it wasn't going to be those at the top of the tree who paid for it.
It never is.

CobolMan

1,431 posts

237 months

Monday 29th March 2010
quotequote all
It was always going to happen, the timing just looks bad. The bank actually closed the final salary scheme to new entrants back in 1997, although a certain Matt B somehow managed to get one when he joined a few years after.