Voter apathy
Author
Discussion

Asterix

Original Poster:

24,438 posts

258 months

Friday 9th April 2010
quotequote all
What is the probability?

You are a Labour benefits type person and you got a call from one of the poll companies like Mori or YouGov. You would probably take the 10 mins to complete their questions racking up a hit for Brown.

How likely are these same people to actually get off their backsides come the election and put an X next to Clunk's name?

I'm guessing it is far lower than the probability of those that want change who are dying to get to the ballot box to stick X next to CMDs so they can get rid of Labour.

I'm guessing that if the polls show a 7-10 point difference before hand - it will be greater come the day.

Puggit

49,810 posts

278 months

Friday 9th April 2010
quotequote all
I agree with your sentiments - and I also pray you are correct!

Pothole

34,367 posts

312 months

Friday 9th April 2010
quotequote all
"a Labour benefits type person"

A what?

JagLover

46,786 posts

265 months

Friday 9th April 2010
quotequote all
Pothole said:
"a Labour benefits type person"

A what?
The non-working classes

Edited by JagLover on Friday 9th April 12:08

Monki

1,233 posts

221 months

Friday 9th April 2010
quotequote all
What we need to stop Labour winning is an all day X-factor special hehe

D-Angle

4,468 posts

272 months

Friday 9th April 2010
quotequote all
Pretty high, I would think.

Voter turnouts are low as it is, with recent scandals people are even more disinclined to vote. Floating voters think all the parties are the same and it doesn't matter who they vote for, and a lot of moderate Labour supporters are very unhappy, to the point that while they might not vote for someone else, they may not have the heart to vote at all.

It comes down to the old adage of voting the ruling party out rather than voting a new lot in, those who want a change in government are a lot more motivated than those who want it to stay the same, as far as I can see.

Asterix

Original Poster:

24,438 posts

258 months

Friday 9th April 2010
quotequote all
Shame it is a negative reaction but I suppose that is exactly what happened in 97 - and they weren't that bad just stale with too much infighting - the country was actually doing pretty well (far better than now).

MX7

7,902 posts

204 months

Friday 9th April 2010
quotequote all
To be honest, I'm fairly apathetic about voter apathy. Most people have very little knowledge about politics, and don't take any real interest until it's election time. A higher the percentage of people voting, means that more people are voting who don't really understand what they are voting for.

I think you're right that the gap will widen, but then again I thought that Labour would struggle in 2005, and they still ended up with a healthy majority.

Asterix

Original Poster:

24,438 posts

258 months

Friday 9th April 2010
quotequote all
MX7 said:
and they still ended up with a healthy majority.
Not of votes they didn't, only marginally ahead overall and they lost in England - I know you knew that. Was just making a point.

Edited by Asterix on Friday 9th April 22:02

groucho

12,134 posts

276 months

Friday 9th April 2010
quotequote all
It's a bit worrying, but all I see round here are Vote Labour boards going up.