PROPORTIONAL REPRESENTATION
Discussion
Can it work, ?
Is it a more fair way of ensuring the person in number 10, is the person, most people voted for ?
I don't really understand, it except much than it gives each person 1 vote at which leader they want in at number 10.
The way I see it now, even if you have fewer of the population voting for you, you can still get to number 10, by virtue of the way the constituencies are made up and divided
'vette
Is it a more fair way of ensuring the person in number 10, is the person, most people voted for ?
I don't really understand, it except much than it gives each person 1 vote at which leader they want in at number 10.
The way I see it now, even if you have fewer of the population voting for you, you can still get to number 10, by virtue of the way the constituencies are made up and divided
'vette
Edited by uk_vette on Friday 7th May 10:25
Edited by uk_vette on Friday 7th May 14:08
uk_vette said:
The way I see it now, even if you have fewer of the population voting for you, you can still get to number 10, by virtue of the way the constiuencies are made up and divided
| Party | Seats | Gain | Loss | Net | Votes | % | +/-% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Conservative | 291 | 95 | 3 | +92 | 10,213,492 | 36.0 | +3.9 |
| Labour | 251 | 2 | 89 | -87 | 8,307,487 | 29.3 | -6.3 |
| Liberal Democrat | 52 | 8 | 13 | -5 | 6,481,602 | 22.9 | +1.0 |
Think this sums up our current system nicely. It sucks, big time, it needs radical overhaul, will it happen? Doubt it.
Edited by Davi on Friday 7th May 11:41
Bee_Jay said:
Well, the last time any party got more than 50% was back in 1931. So if you are asking for PR, then you are asking for the kind of uncertainty we have right now in perpetuity...
However, Cameron PM, Cable Chancellor, Clegg Home Secretary sounds quite good to me...
With a coalition there is a 0% chance of Vince being Chancellor.However, Cameron PM, Cable Chancellor, Clegg Home Secretary sounds quite good to me...
Davi said:
uk_vette said:
The way I see it now, even if you have fewer of the population voting for you, you can still get to number 10, by virtue of the way the constiuencies are made up and divided
| Party | Seats | Gain | Loss | Net | Votes | % | +/-% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Conservative | 291 | 95 | 3 | +92 | 10,213,492 | 36.0 | +3.9 |
| Labour | 251 | 2 | 89 | -87 | 8,307,487 | 29.3 | -6.3 |
| Liberal Democrat | 52 | 8 | 13 | -5 | 6,481,602 | 22.9 | +1.0 |
Think this sums up our current system nicely. It sucks, big time, it needs radical overhaul, will it happen? Doubt it.
Is there an analysis like that on any of the websites?
F i F said:
Davi said:
uk_vette said:
The way I see it now, even if you have fewer of the population voting for you, you can still get to number 10, by virtue of the way the constiuencies are made up and divided
| Party | Seats | Gain | Loss | Net | Votes | % | +/-% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Conservative | 291 | 95 | 3 | +92 | 10,213,492 | 36.0 | +3.9 |
| Labour | 251 | 2 | 89 | -87 | 8,307,487 | 29.3 | -6.3 |
| Liberal Democrat | 52 | 8 | 13 | -5 | 6,481,602 | 22.9 | +1.0 |
Think this sums up our current system nicely. It sucks, big time, it needs radical overhaul, will it happen? Doubt it.
Is there an analysis like that on any of the websites?
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/shared/election2010/result...
| Party | Seats | Gain | Loss | Net | Votes | % | +/-% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Conservative | 291 | 95 | 3 | +92 | 10,213,492 | 36.0 | +3.9 |
| Labour | 251 | 2 | 89 | -87 | 8,307,487 | 29.3 | -6.3 |
| Liberal Democrat | 52 | 8 | 13 | -5 | 6,481,602 | 22.9 | +1.0 |
| Democratic Unionist Party | 8 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 168,216 | 0.6 | -0.3 |
| Scottish National Party | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 482,823 | 1.7 | +0.1 |
| Sinn Fein | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 150,638 | 0.5 | -0.1 |
| Plaid Cymru | 3 | 1 | 0 | +1 | 165,394 | 0.6 | -0.1 |
| Social Democratic & Labour Party | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 107,396 | 0.4 | -0.1 |
| Green | 1 | 1 | 0 | +1 | 269,866 | 1.0 | -0.1 |
| Alliance Party | 1 | 1 | 0 | +1 | 42,325 | 0.1 | +0.0 |
| UK Independence Party | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 871,958 | 3.1 | +0.8 |
| British National Party | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 542,387 | 1.9 | +1.2 |
| Ulster Conservatives and Unionists - New Force | 0 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 102,361 | 0.4 | -0.1 |
| English Democrats | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 64,499 | 0.2 | +0.2 |
| Traditional Unionist Voice | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 26,300 | 0.1 | |
| Respect-Unity Coalition | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 24,719 | 0.1 | -0.1 |
| Christian Party | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 17,261 | 0.1 | |
| Independent Community and Health Concern | 0 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 16,150 0.1 | +0.0 | |
| Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12,275 | 0.0 | |
| Scottish Socialist Party | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3,157 | 0.0 | -0.2 |
| Others | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 271,080 | 1.0 | -0.2 |
| Turnout | 28,341,386 | 65.0 | 4.0 |
There you go FiF...
or you can look here for updates

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/shared/election2010/result...
Thanks chaps so would it look like this based on current situation ie only 621 seats declared.
Of course this may be utter tosh and simple PR may not work like that.
The phrase "like herding cats" comes to mind.
| Party | FPTP | PR |
|---|---|---|
| Conservative | 291 | 224 |
| Labour | 251 | 182 |
| Liberal Democrat | 52 | 142 |
| Democratic Unionist Party | 8 | 4 |
| Scottish National Party | 6 | 11 |
| Sinn Fein | 4 | 3 |
| Plaid Cymru | 3 | 4 |
| Social Democratic & Labour Party | 3 | 2 |
| Green | 1 | 6 |
| Alliance Party | 1 | 1 |
| UK Independence Party | 0 | 19 |
| British National Party | 0 | 12 |
| Ulster Conservatives and Unionists - New Force | 0 | 2 |
| English Democrats | 0 | 1 |
| Traditional Unionist Voice | 0 | 1 |
| Respect-Unity Coalition | 0 | 1 |
| Christian Party | 0 | 0 |
| Independent Community and Health Concern | 0 | 0 |
| Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition | 0 | 0 |
| Scottish Socialist Party | 0 | 0 |
| Others | 1 | 6 |
| Total | 621 | 621 |
Of course this may be utter tosh and simple PR may not work like that.
The phrase "like herding cats" comes to mind.
F i F said:
Thanks chaps so would it look like this based on current situation ie only 621 seats declared.
Of course this may be utter tosh and simple PR may not work like that.
The phrase "like herding cats" comes to mind.
The smaller parties would probably get more votes aswell because people wouldn't think they were a wasted vote| Party | FPTP | PR |
|---|---|---|
| Conservative | 291 | 224 |
| Labour | 251 | 182 |
| Liberal Democrat | 52 | 142 |
| Democratic Unionist Party | 8 | 4 |
| Scottish National Party | 6 | 11 |
| Sinn Fein | 4 | 3 |
| Plaid Cymru | 3 | 4 |
| Social Democratic & Labour Party | 3 | 2 |
| Green | 1 | 6 |
| Alliance Party | 1 | 1 |
| UK Independence Party | 0 | 19 |
| British National Party | 0 | 12 |
| Ulster Conservatives and Unionists - New Force | 0 | 2 |
| English Democrats | 0 | 1 |
| Traditional Unionist Voice | 0 | 1 |
| Respect-Unity Coalition | 0 | 1 |
| Christian Party | 0 | 0 |
| Independent Community and Health Concern | 0 | 0 |
| Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition | 0 | 0 |
| Scottish Socialist Party | 0 | 0 |
| Others | 1 | 6 |
| Total | 621 | 621 |
Of course this may be utter tosh and simple PR may not work like that.
The phrase "like herding cats" comes to mind.
And more to the point, given that in each constituencies a number of people stand for office, why should a vote for one person in one constituency result in another person miles away being elected?
Ah yes, because they wear the same colour of tie...
So what happens to all the independent votes - do they club together and choose which 'independent' should be elected by PR?
Ah yes, because they wear the same colour of tie...
So what happens to all the independent votes - do they club together and choose which 'independent' should be elected by PR?
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff



