More stimulus?
Poll: More stimulus?
Total Members Polled: 129
Discussion
So it looks like the economic recovery is running out of steam. What do you think the authorities response should be?
Keep pumping money into the economy via QE and public works projects?
Cut back on public sector spending because it can't be afford, while hoping that the private sector picks up the slack?
Buy guns, cans of beans and prepare for the worst?
Keep pumping money into the economy via QE and public works projects?
Cut back on public sector spending because it can't be afford, while hoping that the private sector picks up the slack?
Buy guns, cans of beans and prepare for the worst?
3 simple steps to success.
1) Print £900billion of fake currency and give to our Chinese creditors to clear our current debt.
2) Make all public services "essential emergency services" to prevent striking, failure to comply comes under act of terrorism and we can shoot Bob Crow & Charlie Whelan.
3) Cut public sector operating costs to level we can affordably sustain to keep below our deficit levels.
Disclaimer, (1) this might be totally illegal and if they find out blame the Liberals. It was their idea.
1) Print £900billion of fake currency and give to our Chinese creditors to clear our current debt.
2) Make all public services "essential emergency services" to prevent striking, failure to comply comes under act of terrorism and we can shoot Bob Crow & Charlie Whelan.
3) Cut public sector operating costs to level we can affordably sustain to keep below our deficit levels.
Disclaimer, (1) this might be totally illegal and if they find out blame the Liberals. It was their idea.
The problem is that the banks cannot lend. They are being forced to up their capital ratios, and need to cover their debts.
In this situation some form of stimulus is desirable. I would suggest printing more money and simply putting into deposits at the banks at approx 3% return. The banks would then have to lend that money out to make sure that can pay the interest to the government. Everyone should win.
In this situation some form of stimulus is desirable. I would suggest printing more money and simply putting into deposits at the banks at approx 3% return. The banks would then have to lend that money out to make sure that can pay the interest to the government. Everyone should win.
elster said:
Fittster said:
fido said:
Can we have another option:- cut public spending AND cut corporation tax
Why corporation tax? If you want to cut taxes why not those that hit consumers such as VAT and income tax?Fittster said:
elster said:
Fittster said:
fido said:
Can we have another option:- cut public spending AND cut corporation tax
Why corporation tax? If you want to cut taxes why not those that hit consumers such as VAT and income tax?Lowering corporation tax is to avoid businesses leaving the country and maybe enticing some to even locate in the UK.
We are still a long way away from the end of this depression.
Current weak growth, that is slipping again in the US, is an indication of the limitations of Keynesian methods to combat a recession caused by financial crises.
It will be a long slow path back to a healthy economy. The government needs to reduce the burden on the private sector by a) cutting state non jobs, b) combating excessive pay and pensions in the state sector c) cutting benefits expenditure. All the while encouraging private business and supporting the banking sector.
In General I think the current crises is a wake up call to so many western countries which have spent the good times overmanning the state sector (most of whom are on generous pay and pensions) and allowing a substantial proportion of the population of working age to live on state benefits.
Current weak growth, that is slipping again in the US, is an indication of the limitations of Keynesian methods to combat a recession caused by financial crises.
It will be a long slow path back to a healthy economy. The government needs to reduce the burden on the private sector by a) cutting state non jobs, b) combating excessive pay and pensions in the state sector c) cutting benefits expenditure. All the while encouraging private business and supporting the banking sector.
In General I think the current crises is a wake up call to so many western countries which have spent the good times overmanning the state sector (most of whom are on generous pay and pensions) and allowing a substantial proportion of the population of working age to live on state benefits.
JagLover said:
It will be a long slow path back to a healthy economy. The government needs to reduce the burden on the private sector by a) cutting state non jobs, b) combating excessive pay and pensions in the state sector.
By cutting the number of state employees you are increasing the size of the dole queue and by reducing the pay/terms of the remaining employees you are reducing the amount of spending that takes place. Will that get you out of a depression or does it simply risk debt-deflation and mass unemployment.I'm not sure the economy could handle the aggressive budget cutting some are calling for.
Fittster said:
JagLover said:
It will be a long slow path back to a healthy economy. The government needs to reduce the burden on the private sector by a) cutting state non jobs, b) combating excessive pay and pensions in the state sector.
By cutting the number of state employees you are increasing the size of the dole queue and by reducing the pay/terms of the remaining employees you are reducing the amount of spending that takes place. Will that get you out of a depression or does it simply risk debt-deflation and mass unemployment.I'm not sure the economy could handle the aggressive budget cutting some are calling for.
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff



tstreet and start to see deflation.


)