Deepwater Horizon Crude Analysis
Discussion
I've also got a copy of the questions sent to Tony hayward with the preliminary investigation done by the US congress, it's available here:
BP Blowout Questions PDF
BP Blowout Questions PDF
Having a look at it there doesn't seam to be any significant quantities of anything nasty in the oil. We have well's in the UK a lot worse with regards to the crap in the oil you have to deal with.
Even comercially there is not really that much thats going to cause problems I wouldn't have thought
Even comercially there is not really that much thats going to cause problems I wouldn't have thought
XJSJohn said:
looks like prety boggo black smelly, even has a low sulphur content.
Thread drift alert!I remarked, several years ago, that aircraft fuel (Jet A1) smelled different in Russia. Stronger sulphur whiff. At the time I received some odd looks from colleagues but is it possible that I was right?
Always possible that the delivery hose just wasn't sealing properly but I still wonder. As for their anti-icing additives let's not go down that (worrying at 40,000 feet over Scandinavia in January) path.
Quote..
"Despite the risks, BP chose to install the singl e string of casing instead of a liner and
tieback, applying for an amended permit on April 15,11 The company's application stated that
the full casing string would start at 9 7/8 inches diameter at the top of the well and narrow to 7
inches diameter at the bottom, 12 This application was approved on the same day,13
approach, The third version recommends in favor of the single string of casing and is discussed
below,
IJ E-mail from Frank Patton, MMS, to Heather Powell, JC Connor Consulting
("Modifi cation of Permit to Bypass as Location Surface Lease: 032306 Surface ATea: MC
Surface Block: 252 Bottom Lease: 032306 Bottom ATea: MC Bottom Block: 252 Well Name:
001 Assigned API Number: 608174116901 has been approved, as of2010-04-15 14:39:39,0")
(Apr. 14,20 10), Ms, Powell then forwarded the approval to BP, E-mail from Heather Powell...."
so the (I presume from the flannel above) regulators had to AUTHORISE this??
"Despite the risks, BP chose to install the singl e string of casing instead of a liner and
tieback, applying for an amended permit on April 15,11 The company's application stated that
the full casing string would start at 9 7/8 inches diameter at the top of the well and narrow to 7
inches diameter at the bottom, 12 This application was approved on the same day,13
approach, The third version recommends in favor of the single string of casing and is discussed
below,
IJ E-mail from Frank Patton, MMS, to Heather Powell, JC Connor Consulting
("Modifi cation of Permit to Bypass as Location Surface Lease: 032306 Surface ATea: MC
Surface Block: 252 Bottom Lease: 032306 Bottom ATea: MC Bottom Block: 252 Well Name:
001 Assigned API Number: 608174116901 has been approved, as of2010-04-15 14:39:39,0")
(Apr. 14,20 10), Ms, Powell then forwarded the approval to BP, E-mail from Heather Powell...."
so the (I presume from the flannel above) regulators had to AUTHORISE this??
Pesty said:
Mojocvh said:
so the (I presume from the flannel above) regulators had to AUTHORISE this??
Looks like itPesty said:
Mojocvh said:
so the (I presume from the flannel above) regulators had to AUTHORISE this??
Looks like itGassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff




