BBC News
Author
Discussion

Tommy Winchester

Original Poster:

12,424 posts

224 months

Saturday 17th July 2010
quotequote all
Has anyone else noticed they are interviewing more and more people who should have been weeded out by evolution before now?

mybrainhurts

90,809 posts

285 months

Saturday 17th July 2010
quotequote all
Don't watch it...too biased.

Tommy Winchester

Original Poster:

12,424 posts

224 months

Saturday 17th July 2010
quotequote all
I switched from Sky to BBC, find myself back on Sky more now. Anyone point me in another diretion?

mybrainhurts

90,809 posts

285 months

Saturday 17th July 2010
quotequote all

FourWheelDrift

92,332 posts

314 months

Saturday 17th July 2010
quotequote all
Tommy Winchester said:
I switched from Sky to BBC, find myself back on Sky more now. Anyone point me in another diretion?
Ch514 - Al Jazeera. Likely to be less biased than the BBC.

grumbledoak

32,571 posts

263 months

Saturday 17th July 2010
quotequote all
rt.com (Oh, the irony)

Or let google give you a randomized selection of bias.


ETA- If you want TV news, Channel 4's evening news is consistently rated far higher than BBC (very low) or ITN (average) over at www.tvguide.co.uk

Edited by grumbledoak on Saturday 17th July 20:39

rudecherub

1,997 posts

196 months

Saturday 17th July 2010
quotequote all
Tommy Winchester said:
I switched from Sky to BBC, find myself back on Sky more now. Anyone point me in another diretion?
ITN is more balanced IMO than the BBC, but for general News I do watch Sky, but the Internet is more important now for news that really interests me, and analysis.

colonel c

8,054 posts

269 months

Saturday 17th July 2010
quotequote all
CNN.


Disco_Dale

1,893 posts

240 months

Sunday 18th July 2010
quotequote all
Anyone who saw Sky's glorification of the Geordie nutter with a gun a couple of weeks back and still watches it should follow his example and remove themselves from the gene pool imo.

Sheets Tabuer

21,470 posts

245 months

Sunday 18th July 2010
quotequote all
Fox news, no idea what they say as I have the sound down but the presenters are dreamy biggrin

allnighter

6,663 posts

252 months

Sunday 18th July 2010
quotequote all
colonel c said:
CNN.
Always reminds me of the "Holy cow!" comments made by sensationalist reporters during the first Gulf war and stopped watching it ever since!

colonel c

8,054 posts

269 months

Sunday 18th July 2010
quotequote all
allnighter said:
colonel c said:
CNN.
Always reminds me of the "Holy cow!" comments made by sensationalist reporters during the first Gulf war and stopped watching it ever since!
That was along time ago. I belive Fox News do all the yee har stuff. (comming to a SKY News near you real soon)

Mojooo

13,291 posts

210 months

Sunday 18th July 2010
quotequote all
SKY news is awful and the presenters are uppity

Cannot believe people would think it is less biased than the BBC.

Jimbeaux

33,791 posts

261 months

Sunday 18th July 2010
quotequote all
Sheets Tabuer said:
Fox news, no idea what they say as I have the sound down but the presenters are dreamy biggrin
I saw a Public Broadcasting show today that pointed out the fact that while Toyota was catching hell recently, all media outlets were on the bandwagon, all but the Fox News business team (Neil cavuto, Ben Stein, etc.). They were offering caution about blaming it all on Toyota and not laying some blame on the drivers. As it turned out, Toyota made many mistakes (a new Lexus recall is reportedly upcoming), however, drivers were found to be at fault in various cases. Fox was the balanced network. I am not sure if the U.K. gets all aspects of Fox or just the editorial/opinionated segments.

Sheets Tabuer

21,470 posts

245 months

Sunday 18th July 2010
quotequote all
It is a 24 hour a day channel here so I suppose it is live, is it not owned by Murdoch/sky?

One thing that strikes me is the lack of international news on it, international to them is the Mexican border.

GavinPearson

5,715 posts

281 months

Sunday 18th July 2010
quotequote all
Fox News is owned by Murdoch, personally I think it is a great deal fairer than the other major US news channels such as CNN and MSNBC.

Regarding the comment about it being primarily US based, yes that is true, however, they cater to an audience who wants to know about things that interest them, not things that don't. They do a pretty good job all things considered.

thinfourth2

32,414 posts

234 months

Sunday 18th July 2010
quotequote all
Follow the genral rule

If its on the telly it's aimed at morons

Jasandjules

72,620 posts

259 months

Sunday 18th July 2010
quotequote all
As above, I don't bother with the BBC bias s***e.

I just hope that someone soon fixes that.

JMGS4

8,932 posts

300 months

Sunday 18th July 2010
quotequote all
Anybody noticed how much airtime is being given to the losers of the election by the Beeb? Fatty 2 Jags, Gaylord Mandelscum, noBalls and all those other very shady characters, whereas the ruling coalition get nothing but cheap snide comments and unconfirmed rubbish reports from obviously very far left leaning PC reporters....

chris watton

22,547 posts

290 months

Sunday 18th July 2010
quotequote all
Andrew Marr - true to form, just had a leftie 'comedian' on, and the news he ranted on about was the fact that the (Evil) coalition have decided not to invest in something called 'The Green investment Bank' - stating very smarmily "...of course, the planet and environment isn't really important to these people..." (or something like that.

Hateful, hateful programme