what if benefits worked like student loans
what if benefits worked like student loans
Author
Discussion

SplatSpeed

Original Poster:

7,491 posts

281 months

Thursday 18th November 2010
quotequote all
what if the benefits received were to be paid back in later life, say after someone started earning over 21k or won the lottery.

we use this model for students why not all claiments on job seakers allowance??

hyperblue

2,913 posts

210 months

Thursday 18th November 2010
quotequote all
It might put people off going back to work?

Toyo Jim

1,158 posts

237 months

Thursday 18th November 2010
quotequote all
How much does a years worth of benefits add up to?

SplatSpeed

Original Poster:

7,491 posts

281 months

Thursday 18th November 2010
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
no interest in earning over 21K

SplatSpeed

Original Poster:

7,491 posts

281 months

Thursday 18th November 2010
quotequote all
Toyo Jim said:
How much does a years worth of benefits add up to?
up to 150K if you know what you are doing!

Jasandjules

72,622 posts

259 months

Thursday 18th November 2010
quotequote all
SplatSpeed said:
up to 150K if you know what you are doing!
eek

Chris_w666

22,655 posts

229 months

Thursday 18th November 2010
quotequote all
It wouldn't work for those that the country really needs to get off benefits.

Plotloss

67,280 posts

300 months

Thursday 18th November 2010
quotequote all
So when I paid more in tax every month for 10+ years than I took out in 6 months following redundancy I'd have to pay that back again?

On your bike.

Tumbler

1,432 posts

196 months

Thursday 18th November 2010
quotequote all
The better model, is for benefits to be based on what you have paid in.

SplatSpeed

Original Poster:

7,491 posts

281 months

Thursday 18th November 2010
quotequote all
Plotloss said:
So when I paid more in tax every month for 10+ years than I took out in 6 months following redundancy I'd have to pay that back again?

On your bike.
i expect as much from such a lefty wink

you would pay less tax as a result!

BrassMan

1,501 posts

219 months

Thursday 18th November 2010
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
^That.

The benefits trap got bad enough thanks. We want to undo Brown's legacy.

jeff m

4,066 posts

288 months

Friday 19th November 2010
quotequote all
Tumbler said:
The better model, is for benefits to be based on what you have paid in.
yesyes
But would require common sense and logic, most of which appears to have been diluted.

jeff m

4,066 posts

288 months

Friday 19th November 2010
quotequote all
How is the current unemployment benefit calculated now?
Eons ago I claimed unemployment while I was playing squash, it was based on what I had previously earnt as it had an earnings related component.

(I know claiming is now considered to be.....well...not good, but at that time there was very little unemployment and I did supplement my existance with my own money)
Ex pat US based.

PintOfKittens

1,336 posts

220 months

Friday 19th November 2010
quotequote all
How benefits should work is:

  • You get given a flat by the govt. None of this "I want to live in knightsbrige 5 bedroom house" bks
  • You get given food stamps, or food delivered to your door. Tesco value loafs of bread, tesco value cheese, a bit of greens and a lump of what is claimed to be meat.
  • Food, housing, heating provided for you, but you get no cash at all
  • Metered electricity so that if you try to plug in a tv, it will use up all your credit, and your stuck without electricity for the rest of the week/month
  • You work 10 hours a day, 5 days a week like everyone else - clearing the streets of rubbish, cleaning up graffiti, work in hospitals cleaning floors etc - for the UK Department of Manual Labour
  • If you dont work, you dont get food that week, after a month, you get evicted.
  • You can earn some money and time off if you work longer hours, do night shifts, do more risky jobs, be a servant in an army camp (cleaning peoples kit, weapons etc).
  • Criminal conviction = you loose all benefits for a year, thrown out onto the street, your stuff forcefully taken back and sold/given to someone else
  • If your unemployed, get pregnant and then try to live on the dole - your kid gets taken away from you, given to a foster family, and you get sterilised - or you provide for it yourself (ie. booted out, live on the street)
  • Drug addict = two options - go on a drug rehab (which consists of cold turkey, strapped to a bed for a week/month/however long it takes), or fk off. Repeated drug offenders will be donated to medical schools to practice procedures on live patients.
  • Bearded git waving a hook demanding everyones death - be used as live target practice for the army.

snotrag

15,696 posts

241 months

Friday 19th November 2010
quotequote all
So your pretty relaxed about it then POK?

I jest - your right and I agree.

PintOfKittens

1,336 posts

220 months

Friday 19th November 2010
quotequote all
snotrag said:
So your pretty relaxed about it then POK?

I jest - your right and I agree.
Really tired of me working 6 days a week, having 40% of my salary taken off me to fund a bunch of chav scum criminal fkers.

Willie Dee

1,559 posts

238 months

Friday 19th November 2010
quotequote all
SplatSpeed said:
Toyo Jim said:
How much does a years worth of benefits add up to?
up to 150K if you know what you are doing!
Lol source?

GestapoWatch

1,393 posts

220 months

Friday 19th November 2010
quotequote all
PintOfKittens said:
How benefits should work is:

  • You get given a flat by the govt. None of this "I want to live in knightsbrige 5 bedroom house" bks
  • You get given food stamps, or food delivered to your door. Tesco value loafs of bread, tesco value cheese, a bit of greens and a lump of what is claimed to be meat.
  • Food, housing, heating provided for you, but you get no cash at all
  • Metered electricity so that if you try to plug in a tv, it will use up all your credit, and your stuck without electricity for the rest of the week/month
  • You work 10 hours a day, 5 days a week like everyone else - clearing the streets of rubbish, cleaning up graffiti, work in hospitals cleaning floors etc - for the UK Department of Manual Labour
  • If you dont work, you dont get food that week, after a month, you get evicted.
  • You can earn some money and time off if you work longer hours, do night shifts, do more risky jobs, be a servant in an army camp (cleaning peoples kit, weapons etc).
  • Criminal conviction = you loose all benefits for a year, thrown out onto the street, your stuff forcefully taken back and sold/given to someone else
  • If your unemployed, get pregnant and then try to live on the dole - your kid gets taken away from you, given to a foster family, and you get sterilised - or you provide for it yourself (ie. booted out, live on the street)
  • Drug addict = two options - go on a drug rehab (which consists of cold turkey, strapped to a bed for a week/month/however long it takes), or fk off. Repeated drug offenders will be donated to medical schools to practice procedures on live patients.
  • Bearded git waving a hook demanding everyones death - be used as live target practice for the army.
Looks great when laid out like that and I would love to see it implemented.

So why can't it? Also why can't we round up and banish to a remote island those who say they have no interest in behaving like the rest of us? Why do we keep them and pay for them? I've never understood it frown

Chris_w666

22,655 posts

229 months

Friday 19th November 2010
quotequote all
Willie Dee said:
SplatSpeed said:
Toyo Jim said:
How much does a years worth of benefits add up to?
up to 150K if you know what you are doing!
Lol source?
Either the Daily Mail, or by totalling up what a large family could get benefits to the equivalent of per year if they live in an expensive area, have health issues (free prescriptions), and one or two disabled people in the household.

To get to £150k you would need the rent and council tax rates to be very high but it is probably doable in one or two extreme cases.

PintOfKittens

1,336 posts

220 months

Friday 19th November 2010
quotequote all
GestapoWatch said:
So why can't it? Also why can't we round up and banish to a remote island those who say they have no interest in behaving like the rest of us? Why do we keep them and pay for them? I've never understood it frown
Yoomin rights innit blud