Discussion
From BBC website
Actors complaining of funding cuts
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-13010...
Samuel West said the arts industry was the "second most profitable sector in Britain" and it was important funding continued to keep the sector going.
If the industry is that successful it needs a £450 million prop to keep going then there is no hope for the less profitable industries.
Actors complaining of funding cuts
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-13010...
Samuel West said the arts industry was the "second most profitable sector in Britain" and it was important funding continued to keep the sector going.
If the industry is that successful it needs a £450 million prop to keep going then there is no hope for the less profitable industries.
singlecoil said:
Digga said:
Art never was a guaranteed earner; Van Gough being a prime example.
Van Gogh was another one.I have some difficulty in justifying government money going to art.
However i have way way way more difficulty with my money going towards chavs and non-jobs.
So if the government is intent of wasting my money then do please waste it on something that will be enjoyable to those that work. I don't see good art ever being enjoyed by the chav scum.
So while i can't justify it in any logical way i do support the spending on art.
However i have way way way more difficulty with my money going towards chavs and non-jobs.
So if the government is intent of wasting my money then do please waste it on something that will be enjoyable to those that work. I don't see good art ever being enjoyed by the chav scum.
So while i can't justify it in any logical way i do support the spending on art.
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff


