Aliens landed at Roswell. Apparently. Here's the proof.
Discussion
Luke. said:
Run for the hills, you don't want to cast doubts on official theories round these parts 
Shuvi Tupya said:
Luke. said:
Run for the hills, you don't want to cast doubts on official theories round these parts jmorgan said:
I don't see it as casting doubts on the "official story", more asking people to use the grey matter between the ears. Blindly accepting the alien theory without questioning and examining it.......
So, in your opinion we should question the unnofficial story, AND the official story?I would agree with that
Shuvi Tupya said:
jmorgan said:
I don't see it as casting doubts on the "official story", more asking people to use the grey matter between the ears. Blindly accepting the alien theory without questioning and examining it.......
So, in your opinion we should question the unnofficial story, AND the official story?I would agree with that
Yes because they are really lending credibility to the story by using this pic
With this caption
"Was it true? An image allegedly showing one of the aliens that were autopsied at Roswell in 1947"
No it wasn't true you f-cking morons, that picture is taken from the proven fake alien autopsy video
With this caption
"Was it true? An image allegedly showing one of the aliens that were autopsied at Roswell in 1947"
No it wasn't true you f-cking morons, that picture is taken from the proven fake alien autopsy video
Shuvi Tupya said:
jmorgan said:
I don't see it as casting doubts on the "official story", more asking people to use the grey matter between the ears. Blindly accepting the alien theory without questioning and examining it.......
So, in your opinion we should question the unnofficial story, AND the official story?I would agree with that
jmorgan said:
Well, yes and no. The situation needs a look see as well. 1947, start of the cold war and the official story at the time might be slightly different. You are not going to tell the USSR what you can do. This goes for later years when you do not want capabilities to be given away so remain coy about things. But then the ability of certain sections of the community to automatically pin the alien tag on something unexplained does need questioning. The chances are very slim as I see it that we will make contact yet alone be visited. Any claims need cast iron proof.
On both sides?Shuvi Tupya said:
jmorgan said:
Well, yes and no. The situation needs a look see as well. 1947, start of the cold war and the official story at the time might be slightly different. You are not going to tell the USSR what you can do. This goes for later years when you do not want capabilities to be given away so remain coy about things. But then the ability of certain sections of the community to automatically pin the alien tag on something unexplained does need questioning. The chances are very slim as I see it that we will make contact yet alone be visited. Any claims need cast iron proof.
On both sides?Edit. Of course it raises the issue of "we are not in contact".
Edited by jmorgan on Sunday 10th April 10:12
jmorgan said:
Why not. The ET lovers would not believe the government any way.
Edit. Of course it raises the issue of "we are not in contact".
Also, if either side has cast iron proof of an event then there would not be any room for conspiracies in the first place Edit. Of course it raises the issue of "we are not in contact".
Edited by jmorgan on Sunday 10th April 10:12
Pretty soon, the people that are claiming to have first hand knowledge of the event will all be dead anyway, that should kill off any remnants of a challenge to the official story on Roswell.
Shuvi Tupya said:
Pretty soon, the people that are claiming to have first hand knowledge of the event will all be dead anyway, that should kill off any remnants of a challenge to the official story on Roswell.
Although one of them might have a diary which gets released upon their death which has full details........Shuvi Tupya said:
jmorgan said:
Why not. The ET lovers would not believe the government any way.
Edit. Of course it raises the issue of "we are not in contact".
Also, if either side has cast iron proof of an event then there would not be any room for conspiracies in the first place Edit. Of course it raises the issue of "we are not in contact".
Edited by jmorgan on Sunday 10th April 10:12
Pretty soon, the people that are claiming to have first hand knowledge of the event will all be dead anyway, that should kill off any remnants of a challenge to the official story on Roswell.
The only cover-up is that the US military are happy for people to fabricate nutjob theories because it detracts from anything they might be doing that they want to keep secret. Sometimes, I'm sure, they help them along a little with a 'leaked' memo or a cryptic comment by an 'insider'. And that's about the sum of it. The idea of aliens crashing in the desert is not only absurd, it's supported by no evidence.
carmonk said:
The only cover-up is that the US military are happy for people to fabricate nutjob theories because it detracts from anything they might be doing that they want to keep secret. Sometimes, I'm sure, they help them along a little with a 'leaked' memo or a cryptic comment by an 'insider'. And that's about the sum of it. The idea of aliens crashing in the desert is not only absurd, it's supported by no evidence.
I'm sure the US military is more than happy for people to continue dreaming up theories left, right and centre, and I have no doubt they add to the pot from time to time. As for Roswell, it is now so mired in conspiracy and counter-conspiracy that someone could come along with absolute proof and at least one set of conspiracists would immediately invoke the "well they would say that, wouldn't they?" defence. One of the weird things about the whole conspiracy industry is it calls for proof, then immediately discounts any proof that doesn't fit it's own version of events.As for the Roswell alien thing, not sure using a still from the Santilli film really adds anything to the subject.
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff