Mother in Law Moving in, whats the options.
Mother in Law Moving in, whats the options.
Author
Discussion

markys

Original Poster:

620 posts

287 months

Wednesday 15th July 2015
quotequote all
We have recently moved to a larger house, bigger mortgage etc with a view to the mother in law moving in which now looks to be happening soon.

She currently has her own house with no mortgage, recently done up but needs a little tidying. What are our options, she is happy to sell the house give us the cash to make improvements for her and pay off some of the outstanding mortgage. The other thing we ware thinking about is to rent it out and use the cash to pay the monthly payments and over pay where possible to reduce the term and still have a valuable asset. Obviously we want to protect our self's and her for any future costs like care home costs ect, the house value is currently below the IHT limit.

GT03ROB

14,030 posts

251 months

Wednesday 15th July 2015
quotequote all
This post is no help, but think you may get a lot of suggestions that don't relate to finance!

Good luck....seriously..biggrin

p1doc

3,822 posts

214 months

Wednesday 15th July 2015
quotequote all
brave man is all i am going to say lol
seriously worth getting proper financial advice to cover yourself and mother in law in case fall out or needs care soon as council could expect you to pay costs for care from money you have got
martin

markys

Original Poster:

620 posts

287 months

Wednesday 15th July 2015
quotequote all
p1doc said:
brave man is all i am going to say lol
seriously worth getting proper financial advice to cover yourself and mother in law in case fall out or needs care soon as council could expect you to pay costs for care from money you have got
martin
We are getting financial and legal advise to try and cover all eventualities (or as many as possible)

Just thinking lots of people must have been in this very situation before.

Eric Mc

125,759 posts

295 months

Wednesday 15th July 2015
quotequote all
If she rents out her old home, she will pay tax on the annual rental income.

If she sells her former home within 18 months of moving out, she will have no Capital Gains Tax liability on the sale so the entire sales proceeds will be hers to invest as she sees fit. In fact, because she can make use of her Annual Capital Gains Tax limit of (currently) £11,000, she could sell it a bit after the 18 month (free" period and still make a gain but offset her £11,000 allowance against the gain.

When she moves in, are you expecting her to "pay" anything towards her living costs in the house i.e. any sort of rent or lodgings?

I presume she is has no husband or partner?

ATG

23,816 posts

302 months

Wednesday 15th July 2015
quotequote all
Eric, if she keeps her house, would the potential CGT liability be based on the value of the house 18 months after she moved out? I.e. the taxable gain would be any increase in value beyond whatever level it is at in 18 months?

Vocal Minority

8,582 posts

182 months

Wednesday 15th July 2015
quotequote all
It would be based on the amount the property sold for, as that would be the time the Capital Gain materialised.

markys

Original Poster:

620 posts

287 months

Wednesday 15th July 2015
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
If she rents out her old home, she will pay tax on the annual rental income.

If she sells her former home within 18 months of moving out, she will have no Capital Gains Tax liability on the sale so the entire sales proceeds will be hers to invest as she sees fit. In fact, because she can make use of her Annual Capital Gains Tax limit of (currently) £11,000, she could sell it a bit after the 18 month (free" period and still make a gain but offset her £11,000 allowance against the gain.

When she moves in, are you expecting her to "pay" anything towards her living costs in the house i.e. any sort of rent or lodgings?

I presume she is has no husband or partner?
Yes we would be expecting her to pay her way towards our out going bills I suppose in a kind of informal rent. Her husband died a few years back and my partner is her only surviving child.

ATG

23,816 posts

302 months

Wednesday 15th July 2015
quotequote all
Vocal Minority said:
It would be based on the amount the property sold for, as that would be the time the Capital Gain materialised.
Yes, but you need to calculate by how much the value has changed. I'm asking how the start value is determined, not the end value.

was8v

2,013 posts

225 months

Wednesday 15th July 2015
quotequote all
You can rent her a room in your house tax free:

https://www.gov.uk/rent-room-in-your-home/the-rent...

markys

Original Poster:

620 posts

287 months

Wednesday 15th July 2015
quotequote all
was8v said:
You can rent her a room in your house tax free:

https://www.gov.uk/rent-room-in-your-home/the-rent...
That has been mentioned by some accounting family members, also my partner could 'buy' her house from her using a 'loan' from her mother which would be paid back by her house being rented which she would then use to pay us for rent a room, thus giving us rental income and securing the property for my partner.

Vocal Minority

8,582 posts

182 months

Wednesday 15th July 2015
quotequote all
ATG said:
Vocal Minority said:
It would be based on the amount the property sold for, as that would be the time the Capital Gain materialised.
Yes, but you need to calculate by how much the value has changed. I'm asking how the start value is determined, not the end value.
Oh I see, sorry.

Start value will either be what the property was purchased for (if it ever becomes subject to CGT) or what ever the value was on 31 March 1982 - which was when CGT was 'rebased'. Whichever has occurred later.

Eric Mc

125,759 posts

295 months

Wednesday 15th July 2015
quotequote all
markys said:
also my partner could 'buy' her house from her using a 'loan' from her mother which would be paid back by her house being rented which she would then use to pay us for rent a room, thus giving us rental income and securing the property for my partner.
I'm pretty sure that won't achieve anything.

Sales "with reservation to title" holds no water with HMRC.

You do need to realise that this lady is not legally your "mother in law" in that she is the mother of your "partner" and not the mother of your wife. She technically has no familial or legal relationship with you personally at all.

DMN

3,059 posts

169 months

Wednesday 15th July 2015
quotequote all
Option number 1: Move out.

Option number 2: See 1.

oldaudi

1,636 posts

188 months

Wednesday 15th July 2015
quotequote all
Just move into her old house when she moves into yours.

Eric Mc

125,759 posts

295 months

Wednesday 15th July 2015
quotequote all
Somebody mentioned "Rent-A-Room".

Just be aware that the annual amount that can be received under this scheme is leaping dramatically to £7,500 from 6 April 2016.

Sir Bagalot

7,106 posts

211 months

Wednesday 15th July 2015
quotequote all
You could get her to sign her house over to your Wife, and your Wife rent it out.

Have you thought that there is no more noisy sex?

Oh, and in answer to your original question..... You have two options

1. DO NOT LET HER MOVE IN. DON'T DO IT.

2. See Point 1.

ATG

23,816 posts

302 months

Thursday 16th July 2015
quotequote all
Vocal Minority said:
Oh I see, sorry.

Start value will either be what the property was purchased for (if it ever becomes subject to CGT) or what ever the value was on 31 March 1982 - which was when CGT was 'rebased'. Whichever has occurred later.
Blimey. So if you fail to sell the house within the 18 month window, you don't just cease to gain protection from any further increase in value, you retrospectively lose the protection back to date of purchase/ 31 March 82?? Wow. That seems pretty unreasonable. Good info. Thanks!

Eric Mc

125,759 posts

295 months

Thursday 16th July 2015
quotequote all
Valuations are used for specific purposes in CGT. Valuations can sometimes be used to establish the "cost" of the asset or sometimes the "sale value" of the asset.

In a simple world, CGT is based on the ACTUAL sale proceeds minus the ACTUAL cost. The difference is the gain and tax will be charged on that gain.

Of course, life or tax is never as simple as that.

If the asset was bought many years ago (which effectively means before 31 March 1982), then the market value of the asset as it was at 31 March 1982 is used instead of the original cost. This usually works in favour of the taxpayer because most houses were worth more on 31 March 1982 than they would have cost the buyer originally - so using the 31 March 1982 valuation gives you a higher "cost" value and therefore less of a gain.

Sometimes a house is transferred between two parties and no actual sale for actual "cash" takes place. If that is so, it is not obvious what the sale proceeds on disposal really were. If this type of situation occurs, then the sale value will be worked out with reference to the market value of the property on the date of disposal.

This can have a detrimental impact on the person disposing of the property because they might end up with a Capital Gains Tax bill, but, because no cash changed hands, they may find it difficult to pay this tax bill.

Also, when market value is used to establish the "sale" price, there is no guarantee that HMRC will. agree with the value used. If they think the value should be higher, they will appoint the District Valuer to carry out a valuation on their behalf to see if the Market Value should be higher than the amount declared by the seller.