Another capital gain question?
Another capital gain question?
Author
Discussion

tight fart

Original Poster:

3,599 posts

303 months

Saturday 16th January 2016
quotequote all
I have elderly neighbours who have asked me for some financial advice, not in a qualified way but as a friend, I have told them they will need an accountant.
But here's there predicament. (They are 84 & 86)
The husband is now in hospital and quite poorly, his sister recently died (no dependants), he had bought a house for her to live in in 1992 and had never charged her rent. They are now selling this.
They paid £64,500 and are just about to exchange at £260,000.
They have no income apart from the state pension.
Is there any ways to reduce there capital gain (legally)
I told them that they have an allowance each of around £11,000 and will pay 18% upto the higher income bracket then 28%. This they were unaware.

As far as I'm aware he has also paid all the maintenance on the house over the last 24 years but never kept bills.


ellroy

7,846 posts

255 months

Saturday 16th January 2016
quotequote all
Maintenance cannot offset gains as far as I recall.

Improvements can do so, if reasonable.

You can defer the bill by investing in EIS, somewhat risky, but do have some IHT advantages that may be worth consideration?

Decent advice is the way forward on this.



Edited by ellroy on Saturday 16th January 22:28

Eric Mc

125,743 posts

295 months

Sunday 17th January 2016
quotequote all
Did they carry out any major enhancement work on the property over the years?

If they did, have they got any evidence for this expenditure?

Normal care, maintenance and repair work would not count as "Enhancement Expenditure".

tight fart

Original Poster:

3,599 posts

303 months

Sunday 17th January 2016
quotequote all
Thanks Eric, no not as far as I'm aware, at their age reinvesting is not something they would consider, as long as my thoughts are near enough right I'm happy telling them that along with asking an accountant.
Would I be correct in thinking their tax liability would be approx, £31,000 assuming income of around £7,500 state pension.

Eric Mc

125,743 posts

295 months

Sunday 17th January 2016
quotequote all
I'm not doing tax calculations for you. I charge for that smile

How long did they own the property for? It does seem like they must of had it for at least ten years and surely they must have done some work on the house in that time.

tight fart

Original Poster:

3,599 posts

303 months

Sunday 17th January 2016
quotequote all
They have had it 24 years, I don't believe they have done anything major, the husband is to poorly to tell and his wife doesn't know.

Eric Mc

125,743 posts

295 months

Sunday 17th January 2016
quotequote all
Can she find out?

tight fart

Original Poster:

3,599 posts

303 months

Sunday 17th January 2016
quotequote all
Only if he picks up enough to come home.

Eric Mc

125,743 posts

295 months

Sunday 17th January 2016
quotequote all
Is there anybody else who could help dig through paperwork?

MisterJD

152 posts

141 months

Sunday 17th January 2016
quotequote all
Were the husband to die would it not be revalued on death and form part of the estate for IHT purposes at its current value, then the capital gain problem is wiped out and their situation becomes an IHT problem? Is exchange necessary?

Ozzie Osmond

21,189 posts

276 months

Sunday 17th January 2016
quotequote all
Tax alert! Do these people also own their own house so potentially have a large estate?

CGT is charged on gains realised upon sales while you are alive. IHT (Inheritance Tax) is charged on the value of your estate after death.

Oldsters need to avoid CGT like the plague in order to avoid double taxation.

Very simplified and crude example for illustration only:

1. Sell house (not main residence) during lifetime with £1,000,000 capital gain = £280,000 tax. Then die, and the remaining £720,000 is subject to IHT at 40%.
Net value remaining for beneficiaries = £432,000

or

2. Keep the same house until death. Executors sell for £1,000,000. No CGT. IHT charged at 40% = £400,000 tax.
Net value remaining for beneficiaries = £600,00

As you can see, the estate/family is £168,000 better off in scenario 2!

Ozzie Osmond

21,189 posts

276 months

Sunday 17th January 2016
quotequote all
MisterJD said:
Were the husband to die would it not be revalued on death and form part of the estate for IHT purposes at its current value, then the capital gain problem is wiped out and their situation becomes an IHT problem? Is exchange necessary?
You beat me to it while I was typing! smile

Eric Mc

125,743 posts

295 months

Sunday 17th January 2016
quotequote all
Are they selling for a specific reason?

Do they need cash now?

Not everyone has the luxury of being able to hold onto non-liquid assets.

Maybe they could rent it out properly and use it to generate some income for them.

tight fart

Original Poster:

3,599 posts

303 months

Sunday 17th January 2016
quotequote all
No they really want to sell now, I know they have signed but not exchanged contacts
I am also worried that he won't come out of hospital.
I think his wife is too worried for me to mention IHT complications.

MisterJD

152 posts

141 months

Sunday 17th January 2016
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
Are they selling for a specific reason?

Do they need cash now?

Not everyone has the luxury of being able to hold onto non-liquid assets.

Maybe they could rent it out properly and use it to generate some income for them.
The OP states they had owned it for nearly 24 years and were receiving no rent from the sister, at face value it would appear there is flexibility and that it's only being sold following the death of the tenant.

Eric Mc

125,743 posts

295 months

Sunday 17th January 2016
quotequote all
That's what it APPEARS like.

I would like to know if there is an imperative reason why they feel they have to sell now. Maybe there is a reason and maybe their isn't.

hunton69

674 posts

167 months

Tuesday 19th January 2016
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
I'm not doing tax calculations for you. I charge for that smile

How long did they own the property for? It does seem like they must of had it for at least ten years and surely they must have done some work on the house in that time.
Is that a joke

They bought in 1992 and there selling in 2016.



STattam

119 posts

247 months

Wednesday 20th January 2016
quotequote all
There is a trustee beneficiary scenario here isn't there? Someone has been holding a property that was purchased for someone else's benefit. Law of Property Act 1925, s53 1b. The trust just needs to be evidenced in writing, person who has lived needs to ar least be named in the beneficial class and main residence relief will apply. Capital does not have to vest in the beneficiary and could after sale be applied for others if there is a defined beneficial class that includes them, sounds like an absolute trust arrangement I not what is required here.

tight fart

Original Poster:

3,599 posts

303 months

Friday 4th March 2016
quotequote all
As usual in these cases they ask for friendly advice then ignore it.
The husband has improved slightly and has been sent home, he needs careers 3 times a day and is unaware of the goings on.
The wife, (84 ish) has opened a new bank account and had the sale proceeds transferred there to avoid any problems!!