Stamp Duty LTD Company Purchase
Stamp Duty LTD Company Purchase
Author
Discussion

AnimalMother

Original Poster:

1,548 posts

256 months

Monday 7th March 2016
quotequote all

Sorry if this has already been covered.


I'm getting conflicting advise from an accountant and a solicitor with regard to this additional 3% stamp duty. I have a LTD company currently purchasing a student HMO. Ive been trying to get it completed before the 1st of April before this additional 3% stamp duty comes in.

My solicitor is advising me that it doesn't effect a LTD company purchase. But my accountant says he think it does unless the LTD company has 15 or more properties.


I think my accountant is correct and unless the purchase is completed before the 1st of April the company will have to pay an additional 3%?

DonkeyApple

70,298 posts

199 months

Monday 7th March 2016
quotequote all
Ask your solicitor to underwrite the cost of any error on his behalf? wink

Eric Mc

125,743 posts

295 months

Monday 7th March 2016
quotequote all
From a Q and A website on the new 3% surcharge -

Q. Can I avoid the surcharge by setting up a limited company?

A. The government has a keen eye on preventing tax avoidance with this new levy, so you won't be able to escape the surcharge by setting up a limited company for the purpose of buying an additional home or homes. However, at the same time the government wants to protect those deemed as 'contributing towards new housing supply' and is therefore considering exempting individuals (or companies) buying 15 or more properties at one time.


964Cup

1,628 posts

267 months

Monday 7th March 2016
quotequote all
Your solicitor is wrong. Your accountant is right.

Your solicitor is probably confusing the changes to SDLT, which apply to all (with the exception of bulk purchases as noted by another poster) with the changes to tax deductibility of mortgage interest, which apply only to individuals.

Rangeroverover

1,523 posts

141 months

Friday 11th March 2016
quotequote all
I manage many student HMo's and own a couple myself, alas Ltd Co makes no difference...the slight problem is the legislation comes out on 16th march and the law society training courses for conveyancing lawyers start on the 20something of March.

Despite that absolutely Ltd Co will pay the extra 3%, if you have 15 or more rental properties in a single holding Co then you will be exempt.

If you need a suggestion for a conveyancing lawyer who is quick, non pompous, answers the phone and gets the job done let me know

Out of interest where is the HMO

AnimalMother

Original Poster:

1,548 posts

256 months

Friday 11th March 2016
quotequote all

Thanks for replies.


AnimalMother

Original Poster:

1,548 posts

256 months

Friday 11th March 2016
quotequote all
Rangeroverover said:
I manage many student HMo's and own a couple myself, alas Ltd Co makes no difference...the slight problem is the legislation comes out on 16th march and the law society training courses for conveyancing lawyers start on the 20something of March.

Despite that absolutely Ltd Co will pay the extra 3%, if you have 15 or more rental properties in a single holding Co then you will be exempt.

If you need a suggestion for a conveyancing lawyer who is quick, non pompous, answers the phone and gets the job done let me know

Out of interest where is the HMO
That goes someway to explain why the solicitor is incorrect. I probably should find another firm in future, my dad and grandad used this one and they work on credit for me, so its always tempting to stick with them.

Its in Bangor North Wales.

Rangeroverover

1,523 posts

141 months

Saturday 12th March 2016
quotequote all
We encourage all our HMO clients to use Alistair Dunnett at Veitch Penney in Exeter, this holds for properties all over the country not just in the South West......for the avoidance of doubt we get no commision from them; it just makes my life easier if a lawyer doesn't do the pompous "where is my quill pen" routine

DonkeyApple

70,298 posts

199 months

Saturday 12th March 2016
quotequote all
Rangeroverover said:
I manage many student HMo's and own a couple myself, alas Ltd Co makes no difference...the slight problem is the legislation comes out on 16th march and the law society training courses for conveyancing lawyers start on the 20something of March.

Despite that absolutely Ltd Co will pay the extra 3%, if you have 15 or more rental properties in a single holding Co then you will be exempt.

If you need a suggestion for a conveyancing lawyer who is quick, non pompous, answers the phone and gets the job done let me know

Out of interest where is the HMO
How do they treat single/protected cell Ltds?

Surely it becomes quite easy for the SC Ltd type company to run 15 cells for 15 different beneficial owners?

I assume that's been headed off as it seems so obvious a workaround.

ninja-lewis

5,451 posts

220 months

Saturday 12th March 2016
quotequote all
DonkeyApple said:
Rangeroverover said:
I manage many student HMo's and own a couple myself, alas Ltd Co makes no difference...the slight problem is the legislation comes out on 16th march and the law society training courses for conveyancing lawyers start on the 20something of March.

Despite that absolutely Ltd Co will pay the extra 3%, if you have 15 or more rental properties in a single holding Co then you will be exempt.

If you need a suggestion for a conveyancing lawyer who is quick, non pompous, answers the phone and gets the job done let me know

Out of interest where is the HMO
How do they treat single/protected cell Ltds?

Surely it becomes quite easy for the SC Ltd type company to run 15 cells for 15 different beneficial owners?

I assume that's been headed off as it seems so obvious a workaround.
The holding 15+ properties exemption mentioned in the Autumn Statement is not yet confirmed and I think some people may be in for a shock. Question 14 in the consultation was:

"Do you think that either the bulk purchase of at least 15 residential properties or a portfolio test where a purchaser must own at least 15 residential properties are appropriate criteria for the exemption? Which would be better targeted?"

The former seems the more likely approach for supporting investment in increasing the housing supply rather than landlords.

kev1974

4,030 posts

159 months

Saturday 12th March 2016
quotequote all
Not to mention the difficulties getting the money back out of the Ltd Company in the future.

If you sell the property that was in the Ltd Company, the proceeds will all stay in the Ltd Company.
You cannot just transfer that cash to yourself, without massive personal tax considerations.
You might be able to drip feed it out to yourself if your circumstances allow, but what matters is, anyone going the Ltd Company route has to be in it for the long game, to make it worthwhile.
And then the problem is who knows what George might do to property-owning Ltd Companies in the next few years.
He could quite easily come up with special high tax rules that only apply to property profits from Ltd Companies with fewer than say five employees, and instantly screw everyone that's sailed on that ship.


DonkeyApple

70,298 posts

199 months

Sunday 13th March 2016
quotequote all
Not so sure I concur. You'll be paying CGT on any gains made with non primary homes held in your own name. I actually see an advantage in holding the same gains in an Ltd as you can control better how the tax owed is paid to be as efficient to you as possible. And you get limited liability on your debt if it all goes wrong.

Alpinestars

13,954 posts

274 months

Sunday 13th March 2016
quotequote all
DonkeyApple said:
Not so sure I concur. You'll be paying CGT on any gains made with non primary homes held in your own name. I actually see an advantage in holding the same gains in an Ltd as you can control better how the tax owed is paid to be as efficient to you as possible. And you get limited liability on your debt if it all goes wrong.
Depends on if you want to extract the money from the company, how much, and how quickly.

You're likely to pay more tax via the company route if you do extract cash. Which eventually is inevitable.

DonkeyApple

70,298 posts

199 months

Sunday 13th March 2016
quotequote all
Alpinestars said:
DonkeyApple said:
Not so sure I concur. You'll be paying CGT on any gains made with non primary homes held in your own name. I actually see an advantage in holding the same gains in an Ltd as you can control better how the tax owed is paid to be as efficient to you as possible. And you get limited liability on your debt if it all goes wrong.
Depends on if you want to extract the money from the company, how much, and how quickly.

You're likely to pay more tax via the company route if you do extract cash. Which eventually is inevitable.
Very possibly correct but personally I'm not quite seeing it. The Ltd option opens up so many more ways to pay less tax ultimately just because the amount of tax liable at the moment of sale is likely to be much lower and you have quite a few option open in when and how you end up paying the different. Especially as we are more than likely looking at sums that take an individual into the highest rate income tax bracket.

Rangeroverover

1,523 posts

141 months

Tuesday 15th March 2016
quotequote all
The ltd Co route will also make debt more difficult as not all lenders are keen

DonkeyApple

70,298 posts

199 months

Tuesday 15th March 2016
quotequote all
Rangeroverover said:
The ltd Co route will also make debt more difficult as not all lenders are keen
You'd expect a lower LTV as its a limited liability wrapper so a lender would need more margin. But I wonder if the impending tax changes will somewhat level that as its unlikely for highly leveraged models to work in individual's names?

joscal

2,615 posts

230 months

Tuesday 15th March 2016
quotequote all
DonkeyApple said:
You'd expect a lower LTV as its a limited liability wrapper so a lender would need more margin. But I wonder if the impending tax changes will somewhat level that as its unlikely for highly leveraged models to work in individual's names?
Was wondering this too.

AnimalMother

Original Poster:

1,548 posts

256 months

Wednesday 16th March 2016
quotequote all
DonkeyApple said:
Rangeroverover said:
The ltd Co route will also make debt more difficult as not all lenders are keen
You'd expect a lower LTV as its a limited liability wrapper so a lender would need more margin. But I wonder if the impending tax changes will somewhat level that as its unlikely for highly leveraged models to work in individual's names?
I think we will see an increase in the availability of buy to let mortgages for LTD companies. Some have already started to relax their criteria for LTD companies in this first quarter.


I think most if not all mortgages available for LTD company buy to lets involve the director acting as guarantor.

Alpinestars

13,954 posts

274 months

Wednesday 16th March 2016
quotequote all
No exemption from the additional SDLT for significant investors.

DonkeyApple

70,298 posts

199 months

Wednesday 16th March 2016
quotequote all
Alpinestars said:
No exemption from the additional SDLT for significant investors.
I was surprised as I did think that there would be favour shown towards funds etc. They've upped stamp on corporate property also from what I heard?