I cannot afford my mortgage interest rate increase
I cannot afford my mortgage interest rate increase
Author
Discussion

Jon39

Original Poster:

14,555 posts

167 months

Thursday 17th November 2022
quotequote all
Listened this morning to a radio programme caller.

"Early next year, my fixed rate mortgage will increase from 1.79% to 5.3%. My savings have nearly gone , so I will not be able to pay the higher monthly payments."

Whilst feeling sorry for the person's predicament (there are probably a huge number in a similarly awful position), the older generation might be remembering their mortgage payment days.

A 1.79% mortgage could not even be dreamt of by the 'baby boomer' generation. They paid 8%, 12%, even at one point over 15% interest rates.
For the past 10 years, interest rates have been artificially low (base rates at an historic 300 year low), so unfortunately perhaps, the younger generation might have thought such low rates are perfectly normal. That presumably also encouraged greater amounts of borrowing, which in turn had an upward effect on property prices. It is all connected.

An unfortunate mess that was forseeable, but possibly only by older people who had paid far more for their mortgages, or by younger home buyers who have studied financial history.

The action for mortgage borrowers to minimise future trouble, would have been to set aside some money, during the period of the artificially low mortgage payments. That would have needed strong discipline though, when so much tempting consumers goods was being heavily marketed. A more expensive car with monthly PCP perhaps.

I have said before, the immediate future might unfortunately be grim for many. Unusual circumstances have arisen, with several different cost increases all occurring at the same time and they affect many countries, not just the UK.

1. Sudden increased demand following the pandemic = price increases.
2. Invasion of Ukraine = further increasing the already rising world energy prices and reducing the supply of certain commodities.
Restricted commodities usually then feed on to other materials and products, causing more price increases.
3. Inflation resulting from 1. & 2., causing world banks to increase interest rates, in an effort to reduce consumption and inflation.

Point 3. must be open to some debate, because 1. & 2. already have some effect on reducing consumption and local interest rate rises cannot have an immediate effect on reducing world oil and gas prices (originally caused by restricted supply).

I hope better times soon return. Much is presumably dependent on one person (not naming).


Largechris

2,019 posts

115 months

Thursday 17th November 2022
quotequote all
Clickbait thread title.

Of course it turns out not to be about OP who brought their house for buttons 40 years ago.

Tedious.

Simpo Two

91,609 posts

289 months

Thursday 17th November 2022
quotequote all
We survived the 15% days!

It's all the gubberment's fault of course...

But seriously, what with that and the energy increases, there is much domestic carnage to come.

We also seem to expect the standard of living to go up year after year, but there is no law that says it should. Ergo, the standard of living will have to go down, there is no more free money to prop it up, and people will just have to get used to it. They will hate it, and so they will vote Labour in, and Labour will do no better because they can't.

z4RRSchris

12,420 posts

203 months

Thursday 17th November 2022
quotequote all
multiples were low, and you have had the benefit of post that 15% rate a 30 year rampant bull market.

see the other thread.

Scabutz

8,721 posts

104 months

Thursday 17th November 2022
quotequote all
Yeah interest rates used to be 15% but mortgages were tiny. My parents first house cost about 50k. Their current home cost 110k for a 4 bed detached. My first 1 bed flat cost me 120k

Sarnie

8,326 posts

233 months

Thursday 17th November 2022
quotequote all
The "older" generation who talk about "when they had to pay 10% for their mortgage" forget that the value of their property and therefore their mortgage were so much lower than the property values of today. They also forget that they will have benefited massively in the property prices since the times when they had to pay 10% rates.

There seems to be a "them and us" in this debate. With the older generations looking down on the younger people who have had to pay £500k for a 2 bed mid-terrace, sold to them by someone who paid £30k for it in 1990 when they had to pay 10% on their £20k mortgage.......

It's frustrating to read......

DodgyGeezer

46,993 posts

214 months

Thursday 17th November 2022
quotequote all
in fairness while we had 15% interest rates the houses were cheaper as a salary multiple (at least in the SE, other areas may differ) and the lower interest rate off-set that difference. Now that rates are rising the higher prices combined with higher rates can really bite. That's not to say that people have not been too profligate (everything new and on drip) and now the chickens are coming home to roost...

Monkeylegend

28,548 posts

255 months

Thursday 17th November 2022
quotequote all
The big difference is the cost of property today compared to wages/salaries, versus 40 years or so ago.

Yes we had mortgage rates up at 15% for a time but on a mortgage that would not even be enough for a deposit at todays prices.

I bought my first house for £28k with a mortgage of £25k and I was earning nearly that at the time.

You can understand why so many younger buyers are now struggling.

Edited to say I don't look down on them, I have a great deal of sympathy for anyone trying to establish themselves on the housing ladder today.

My generation have had it so easy by comparison.


Edited by Monkeylegend on Thursday 17th November 10:24

BoRED S2upid

20,996 posts

264 months

Thursday 17th November 2022
quotequote all
If anyone thought interest rates starting with a 1 we’re going to stay forever they were kidding themselves.

RDMcG

20,588 posts

231 months

Thursday 17th November 2022
quotequote all
Much harder now- when I bought a house in Canada (2000 Sq ft detached bungalow) interest rates were 17% but the house was $90k. My wife and I had a joint income of $70k.

Today the concept of a house being less than 1.5 times annual income is fantasy. More like 7 times in Toronto.
Lots of sympathy for those facing this challenge.

popeyewhite

23,008 posts

144 months

Thursday 17th November 2022
quotequote all
BoRED S2upid said:
If anyone thought interest rates starting with a 1 we’re going to stay forever they were kidding themselves.
Pure naivety.

My first wage? !n 1980 £380 pw working as an electrical engineer. God only knows what that would pay now.

nunpuncher

3,735 posts

149 months

Thursday 17th November 2022
quotequote all
What's your point caller? Just seems to be a statement of smugness with no real point or question.

I don't buy the "interest rates were artificially low and the norm will resume". High child mortality used to be "the norm", life expectancy roughly 10 years lower than what it is today was "the norm' in 1980. The world changes, society changes and the economic make up of the world also changes. More people now have debt and credit and I think the norm will be interest rates lower than the doom mongers would wish. Interest rates are only there for lenders to make money on money, it's not like the weather, unpredictable and beyond all control. There are contributing factors (inflation caused partly by the free jets tokens the government handed out for example) but it's a figure that is set by mere mortals and has to be balanced at the tipping point of affordability as the last thing lenders want is borrowers to default.

Edited by nunpuncher on Thursday 17th November 10:44

s1962a

7,449 posts

186 months

Thursday 17th November 2022
quotequote all
popeyewhite said:
BoRED S2upid said:
If anyone thought interest rates starting with a 1 we’re going to stay forever they were kidding themselves.
Pure naivety.

My first wage? !n 1980 £380 pw working as an electrical engineer. God only knows what that would pay now.
£380 per week? That seems like a pretty decent wage for 1980. Your spending power must have been pretty substantial?

BOR

5,097 posts

279 months

Thursday 17th November 2022
quotequote all
popeyewhite said:
BoRED S2upid said:
If anyone thought interest rates starting with a 1 we’re going to stay forever they were kidding themselves.
Pure naivety.
Plenty of younger people won't have experience of anything other than 1% to base their judgement on.

I'm big on personal responsibility, but I resent how slack banks have been in dishing out mortgages.
30 years ago, we had to beg for 3x salary, now, I hear of 5x or 8x or x both salaries or made up self certification numbers.

The banks should be the gatekeepers for loans.

I would come up with some sort of legislation to only allow 3x salary to be secured against the house, and anything over that cannot be reclaimed by the bank in case-of-default.

Edited by BOR on Thursday 17th November 10:49

popeyewhite

23,008 posts

144 months

Thursday 17th November 2022
quotequote all
nunpuncher said:
Interest rates are only there for lenders to make money on money,
Rising interest rates are an attempt to control inflation by curbing spending and rewarding those who save. Good times for cheap mortgages can't go on forever.

Largechris

2,019 posts

115 months

Thursday 17th November 2022
quotequote all
BOR said:
popeyewhite said:
BoRED S2upid said:
If anyone thought interest rates starting with a 1 we’re going to stay forever they were kidding themselves.
Pure naivety.
Plenty of younger people won't have experience of anything other than 1% to base their judgement on.

I'm big on personal responsibility, but I resent how slack banks have been in dishing out mortgages.
30 years ago, we had to beg for 3x salary, now, I hear of 5x or 8x or x both salaries or made up self certification numbers.

The banks should be the gatekeepers for loans.

I would come up with some sort of legislation to only allow 3x salary to be secured against the house, and anything over that cannot be reclaimed in case-of-default.
Liz Truss would approve of that sort of economics.

nunpuncher

3,735 posts

149 months

Thursday 17th November 2022
quotequote all
s1962a said:
popeyewhite said:
BoRED S2upid said:
If anyone thought interest rates starting with a 1 we’re going to stay forever they were kidding themselves.
Pure naivety.

My first wage? !n 1980 £380 pw working as an electrical engineer. God only knows what that would pay now.
£380 per week? That seems like a pretty decent wage for 1980. Your spending power must have been pretty substantial?
My dad bought a Rolex submariner back in the early 80s for £400.

What's that got to do with anything? Well, I doubt very much that someone just starting out as an electrical engineer today could buy a sub on their gross monthly wage let alone on their net weekly wage. And this is part of the problem, wages have not risen at the same rate as many other things, especially houses.

ChevronB19

8,527 posts

187 months

Thursday 17th November 2022
quotequote all
popeyewhite said:
BoRED S2upid said:
If anyone thought interest rates starting with a 1 we’re going to stay forever they were kidding themselves.
Pure naivety.

My first wage? !n 1980 £380 pw working as an electrical engineer. God only knows what that would pay now.
That’s nearly 6k a month (gross) in todays figures? As a first job? Are you sure?

popeyewhite

23,008 posts

144 months

Thursday 17th November 2022
quotequote all
s1962a said:
£380 per week? That seems like a pretty decent wage for 1980. Your spending power must have been pretty substantial?
I worked my socks off doing split shifts, only having Sunday off for 4 years. Still think £380 is that good? smile

Sheepshanks

39,483 posts

143 months

Thursday 17th November 2022
quotequote all
BOR said:
now, I hear of 5x or 8x or x both salaries or made up self certification numbers.
Who's getting loans like that? I don't think your average person in the street is.

Both my daughters struggled to get their very sensible mortgages and both they and their husbands are in decent public sector jobs at a middling level - not massively paid, but not bad either.


I'm surprised no-one has blamed youngsters having iPhones and leased white Audis yet.


Some of the salaries from the 80's mentioned earlier seem very high - I was on £8K when we got our first house and £12.5K (although had a company car|) in 1986 when we got our second. Wife was at home looking after the kids.

Edited by Sheepshanks on Thursday 17th November 11:02