Why? Sponsor more important than facts?

[craig1912]

Mods.. Simple question, why was the IM thread deleted when there was a lot of useful information.

I understand it wasn’t that palatable to a forum sponsor but there was nothing but actual facts and nothing defamatory. Does money talk louder?

Going down a rabbit hole with actions like that.

[Ken_Code]

They claim it breached rules for naming and shaming among other things.

It didn’t, it was a discussion of a company found to be in breach of their responsibilities by their regulator and which was then put into administration by their management.

[MaxFromage]

FAO the moderators.

If you are going to remove my right to reply on a topic (IM), then you must remove any reference to myself. I did not disrupt but will do so if not taken seriously. This post and any referencing to it need to go:


'Hi,

It is no surprise that the thread you mention, Mr Pointy, has been moderated. A clear breach of PH/Car Guru's rules. At the end of the day, those posters were not clients, never would be and only wanted to disrupt. We don't make the rules.

This thread is about the investment pools and related. Anything else is OT.

Regards

Adam'

[Ben Lowden]

Please see here https://www.pistonheads.com/gassing/topic.asp?h=0&...