Splitting the house in a divorce
Discussion
Standard is 50/50 unless you had the paperwork drawn up when buying to say otherwise - doesn’t sound like you did.
You’re in the right path with the rest.
In my own experience it’s usually easier to call it half’s and get it done quick, otherwise you’re going to be looking at bigger solicitor fees than the value you may have gained.
You’re in the right path with the rest.
In my own experience it’s usually easier to call it half’s and get it done quick, otherwise you’re going to be looking at bigger solicitor fees than the value you may have gained.
I'm going through it. Forget any concept of 'fair'.
The starting point is the ability of each party to pay a mortgage. So if one earns more than the other, they can have a larger mortgage, so may get a smaller slice of the equity. The starting point may be 50/50, but if that doesn't give the one who earns less the ability to afford a reasonable home, it won't end up 50/50.
Unless you manage to agree 50/50 of course, but I would still suggest that you get an agreement written up by a mediator to show that it was agreed by both parties. Financial mediation is very cheap or even free depending on income levels.
The starting point is the ability of each party to pay a mortgage. So if one earns more than the other, they can have a larger mortgage, so may get a smaller slice of the equity. The starting point may be 50/50, but if that doesn't give the one who earns less the ability to afford a reasonable home, it won't end up 50/50.
Unless you manage to agree 50/50 of course, but I would still suggest that you get an agreement written up by a mediator to show that it was agreed by both parties. Financial mediation is very cheap or even free depending on income levels.
Gassing Station | Finance | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff



