Change to Financial Year End
Discussion
I'm not an accountant or anything like that but I've done this before, I can't think of a reason why a company in distress would do this. It's usually a convenience based on syncing up with other systems. If a company was in distress, changing the date would be the last thing on their mind.
lizardbrain said:
I'm not an accountant or anything like that but I've done this before, I can't think of a reason why a company in distress would do this. It's usually a convenience based on syncing up with other systems. If a company was in distress, changing the date would be the last thing on their mind.
I suspect you’re right.The US company I worked for did that many years back. Didn’t make a blip on the trajectory.
Maybe ask the company on a public forum

Could be to help get accounts done early to help with refinancing i.e have audited accs for a bank or external finance or something trivial like reducing auditor fees. There is a very disproportionate no. Of companies with a Dec y/e so auditors are flat out to get accounts done within the 9 mths of y/e
Meandraft said:
I've recently learnt via a Companies House notification that the company I work for has just changed their year end from 31st December to 30th June. Any ideas or experience on why a company would do this?
Is it delaying the next set of accounts or bringing them forward? i.e. if it's making the next accounting period 18 months rather than 12 it MIGHT be trying to buy time.is it part of a Group of companies and trying to align reporting periods?
lizardbrain said:
I'm not an accountant or anything like that but I've done this before, I can't think of a reason why a company in distress would do this. It's usually a convenience based on syncing up with other systems. If a company was in distress, changing the date would be the last thing on their mind.
Distress can be a reason to change and can actually be one of the first things on their minds- fights with auditors around going concern, potential year end covenant breach that they want to avoid, trying to sort a refinance etc etcCan also be less concerning reasons as others have said
The company i worked for changed its year end because it got a new (American) CEO, who couldn't get his head round the concept of a September year-end, and that Oct-Dec was therefore Q1, Jan-Mar was Q2 and so on. Seriously, we had to change the year end for about 15 companies in the group and pay twice as expensive audit fees, cock up all historic reporting (Q1 of an old financial year not equivalent to Q1 this year etc) purely because the new CEO couldnt get his head round it. Biggest waste of time. I lost a lot of respect for the CFO for not standing up to him on that one.
It really can be for no good reason at all.
It really can be for no good reason at all.
Gassing Station | Finance | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff



