Henry hoover: cordless v corded
Henry hoover: cordless v corded
Author
Discussion

Jukebag

Original Poster:

1,463 posts

168 months

Friday 18th October 2019
quotequote all
I'm tempted to buy an Henry hoover (just the basic model not a compact etc) and I've considered getting a cordless. Anyone recommend one?. I have a G-Tech and a G-tech Airram and they are pretty terrible hoovers; the upright one isn't too bad at picking up hairs, but the handheld Airram is pathetic. There is barely any suction power, and when it picks up any crumbs etc they often fall straight out, and that's with the crevice attachment. I've looked up videos of the Henry cordless and they seem to be quite powerful, certainly more powerful than a G-Tech, in one video test the suction seemed more powerful than the standard corded version.

The only downside is the battery life, and although they come with two batteries, they only give a full running time of about 40 mins. I haven't yet seen any for sale at the local Tesco or Asda, only Argos and online sell them.

TwistingMyMelon

6,507 posts

234 months

Friday 18th October 2019
quotequote all
Ive always found henrys no nonsense and well thought out, if ugly and bulky (but very robust)

If you are worried about battery life buy another battery


Mr Pointy

13,343 posts

188 months

Friday 18th October 2019
quotequote all
When this has come up previously a few poster rate the Shark as pretty good.

oblio

5,602 posts

256 months

Friday 18th October 2019
quotequote all
I have a basic Henry corded model and its bullet proof. It's kept in the garage now for use in the car and motorhome when they get cleaned...and for general tidying up of the garage (not very often!).

My Mrs doesn't like it at all (hence the relegation to the garage) but I think they are great for the money...

smile

hotchy

4,828 posts

155 months

Friday 18th October 2019
quotequote all
I use our old henry for hoovering up the ash left in the bbq. Not broke yet haha.

devnull

3,862 posts

186 months

Friday 18th October 2019
quotequote all
I have no idea why brits cling onto the idea that henry hoovers are any good. I wouldn't say so much if they had a rotating brush attachment, but they are ancient tech, and back breaking smelly tech at that. They are only good as garage / dust vacuums.


TheInternet

5,230 posts

192 months

Friday 18th October 2019
quotequote all
devnull said:
I have no idea why brits cling onto the idea that henry hoovers are any good. I wouldn't say so much if they had a rotating brush attachment, but they are ancient tech, and back breaking smelly tech at that. They are only good as garage / dust vacuums.
This. They're utterly dreadful. Cheap rubbish.

Jukebag

Original Poster:

1,463 posts

168 months

Friday 18th October 2019
quotequote all
I do have to agree that Henry's are brilliant hoovers.

Dogwatch

6,381 posts

251 months

Friday 18th October 2019
quotequote all
I have a corded Henry cloud9 and was in a leisure centre cafe when one of the assistants appeared to do the floor with the cordless version which I was unaware existed.

Intrigued I asked her about its performance and while it is most effective on high power this runs the battery down pretty quickly so to cover the cafe floor they have to use the lower power setting, which obviously doesn't clean as well. I think they would have preferred a corded but with children running in and out of the soft play area it was a no-no.

Buzz84

1,699 posts

178 months

Friday 18th October 2019
quotequote all
Mrs Buzz works air side at Gatwick, the cleaners on the planes there have had cordless Henry's for years, she said they weren't very good.

That is untill she noticed that they were actually the corded ones and the cleaners were too lazy to plug them in and keep moving them to other sockets to reach all the various parts of the plane within the limited time they had for a turnaround. so they just made the motions while humming like a hoover...


monty999

1,236 posts

134 months

Friday 18th October 2019
quotequote all
Henry's are found in most tradesman vans and are used a lot in commercial cleaning, I have one in my van and it's brilliant. At home, at the beginning of the year we bought a cordless Dyson (£450 !), it cleans half the house (on full power) then dies. Can't understand why you would want to use on anything other than full power as then it sucks hardly anything up. Corded every time if you want a decent vacuum, Henry or corded Dyson.

I-A

428 posts

186 months

Monday 21st October 2019
quotequote all
devnull said:
I have no idea why brits cling onto the idea that henry hoovers are any good. I wouldn't say so much if they had a rotating brush attachment, but they are ancient tech, and back breaking smelly tech at that. They are only good as garage / dust vacuums.
We use it with this attachment:

https://www.amazon.co.uk/Universal-Numatic-George-...

Watchman

6,391 posts

274 months

Monday 21st October 2019
quotequote all
TheInternet said:
devnull said:
I have no idea why brits cling onto the idea that henry hoovers are any good. I wouldn't say so much if they had a rotating brush attachment, but they are ancient tech, and back breaking smelly tech at that. They are only good as garage / dust vacuums.
This. They're utterly dreadful. Cheap rubbish.
Agreed. In fact I was going to post in the First World Problems thread how irritated I get when my cleaner insists on using her Henry instead of our Dyson (with rotating brush).

Henry is perfect for a sawdust collector in the garage but it just doesn't lift much dirt out of carpets.

TwistingMyMelon

6,507 posts

234 months

Monday 21st October 2019
quotequote all
Henrys are cheap simple and un breakable

My misses smashed a £300 miele to bits in 2 years , our 4 year old Henry wont die

Same with the cleaners at work, they have smashed everything to bits, bar the Henry

Dysons are nice but twice the price and I want somthing to clean my floor not look good

My toddler son is obsessed with them, so if it keeps him happy , im happy, a dyson doesnt cut it with him

They are bulky and smell, but I dont mind. Many a time ive used them as a step as well


Glasgowrob

3,345 posts

150 months

Monday 21st October 2019
quotequote all
Henry for the cars

shark for the house, both work fantastically well

biggiles

2,159 posts

254 months

Monday 21st October 2019
quotequote all
TwistingMyMelon said:
Henrys are cheap simple and un breakable
[..]
They are bulky and smell, but I don't mind.
Henry fan here as well. Ours was smelly a few years ago- someone hoovered up something unpleasant which stuck to the inside "rifling" of the hose and was impossible to dislodge. Easy/cheap to replace the hose with a new clean hose.

48k

17,378 posts

177 months

Monday 21st October 2019
quotequote all
I was considering a cordless Henry to replace my corded one but the reviews online don't seem very positive - people who have had the corded one say the cordless one doesn't have the suction.

bogie

17,068 posts

301 months

Monday 21st October 2019
quotequote all
New vacuums have been crippled by the EU power laws. So an older Henry/George etc will be 1200w whereas a new one will be 600w. You are not allowed to own a powerful vacuum these days...bad for the environment apparently ....


rallye101

2,517 posts

226 months

Monday 21st October 2019
quotequote all
G tech things with the collie dogs in their Ads....run!!! Absolute crap...i have both hand held and floor for my office...s@#$e! Dont get me started on my waste of money...

Escort3500

13,468 posts

174 months

Monday 21st October 2019
quotequote all
Of all the vacuum cleaners we’ve had over the years the Dyson has been the worst (overpriced, pretty ineffective and short-lived) and a Shark and Miele the best. Henry comes somewhere between the two ends of the scale.