House purchase- clawback agreement query
House purchase- clawback agreement query
Author
Discussion

Patrick Bateman

Original Poster:

12,975 posts

195 months

Tuesday 15th July 2025
quotequote all
We're buying a new house which comes with a field and as part of the deal the seller has put a clawback agreement on the field should we ever sell the land with an uplift in value etc.

My query is relating to our solicitor (same company the seller is using) adding on fees for additional conveyancing relating to this. Given this is all to benefit the seller, is this something he should cover or is this typical? Totally naïve on this so may be way off the mark!

We're in Scotland, in case that makes a difference.


AW10

4,612 posts

270 months

Tuesday 15th July 2025
quotequote all
Can't answer the question you've asked but using the same firm of solicitors as the seller seems an unnecssary risk to me.

Patrick Bateman

Original Poster:

12,975 posts

195 months

Tuesday 15th July 2025
quotequote all
Immaterial now, missives are concluded.

AyBee

11,123 posts

223 months

Wednesday 16th July 2025
quotequote all
No idea what's normal, but if you're unhappy with it (as I would be), then raise it and see what happens...

Jobbo

13,566 posts

285 months

Wednesday 16th July 2025
quotequote all
I’m not able to speak for Scotland because property law differs from England & Wales. But I specialise in overage and this sort of work is either involved and expensive (done properly) or absolute rubbish (tacked onto a conveyancing job). I’d always expect to pay more in legal fees but you really do get what you pay for.

AW10

4,612 posts

270 months

Wednesday 16th July 2025
quotequote all
When you say new do you mean new build?

If your conveyancing costs are included to sweeten the deal then it depends on the fine print. Have they agreed to simply pay your costs or have they set a maximum?

If you’re just coincidentally using the same conveyancer then it doesn’t seem unreasonable to be charged more for more work.

More context is needed me thinks.

Acuity30

835 posts

39 months

Wednesday 16th July 2025
quotequote all
Your first mistake was using the solicitors the seller is using. Conflict of interest. This is house buying 101 stuff

Patrick Bateman

Original Poster:

12,975 posts

195 months

Thursday 17th July 2025
quotequote all
Solicitor had come back with 'The general position with Clawbacks is that each party covers their own fees, The thinking being without it the seller would have been looking for a higher price for the land so it benefits both parties'.

Regarding my choice of solicitor, thanks for the patronising tone on house buying 101 but it is possible for us to use the same company with different solicitors. It's not like I went out looking to match him, we already had our solicitors in place since last October when we went on the market and we only saw this house back in May, low and behold, he was using the same company.

scotlandtim

418 posts

149 months

Thursday 17th July 2025
quotequote all
HI

I had similar situation a couple of years ago - bought a house with extending 4 acres.

Prev owner tried for clawback, I contested it in the end and it was removed as I wasn't willing to pay conveyancing for it - was willing to allow it to be in place, but wouldn't pay for it.

All done on the advice of my excellent solicitor who is an expert in rural land management in Scotland.

https://www.leyshonws.co.uk/davidsoeder.asp

Give this chap a call and discuss your options - can't praise him enough


Patrick Bateman

Original Poster:

12,975 posts

195 months

Thursday 17th July 2025
quotequote all
Thanks for that but the deal is done. It was just a query off the back of my final bill.