Building surveyor question
Author
Discussion

Jumpy Guy

Original Poster:

449 posts

240 months

Thursday 21st August 2025
quotequote all
Hello,
I have an old house, which has a passageway y behind the house.

How would a surveyor measure and describe this?



Edited by Jumpy Guy on Monday 25th August 21:49


Edited by Jumpy Guy on Tuesday 26th August 13:35

PhilboSE

5,649 posts

247 months

Thursday 21st August 2025
quotequote all
If you really had to describe it accurately then probably as a combination of the rectangular section and the semicircular bit on top, with accurate measurements/radii.

Usually though for odd/restricted shapes they would describe the main opening; such as “4ft wide at narrrowest point to 4ft in height, with arch above”.

rdjohn

6,890 posts

216 months

Thursday 21st August 2025
quotequote all
I think that a Quadrant arch from 4ft to 8ft, would be a clearer description.

A photo would give a very clear idea of what is available.

OutInTheShed

12,704 posts

47 months

Monday 25th August 2025
quotequote all
On a typical estate agent type floor plan, the area with less than a certain amount of head room would be indicated as 'restricted head height' or summat.
I can't immediately say what that 'certain amount of headroom' is.

Jumpy Guy

Original Poster:

449 posts

240 months

Monday 25th August 2025
quotequote all
Agree, and surveyors able to share some professional thoughts?

Pit Pony

10,601 posts

142 months

Monday 25th August 2025
quotequote all
Jumpy Guy said:
Thats not dimensioned in a way that would conform to any national or international standard, but tells the story adequately.

Cow Corner

680 posts

51 months

Monday 25th August 2025
quotequote all
It would help if we understood the reason for needing to measure and describe it?


Jumpy Guy

Original Poster:

449 posts

240 months

Monday 25th August 2025
quotequote all
thanks

Edited by Jumpy Guy on Wednesday 27th August 23:44

OutInTheShed

12,704 posts

47 months

Monday 25th August 2025
quotequote all
I wouldn't assume that either the lining of the roof or the floor level were original.

Neither would I assume the old measurements were reliable!