Open fire, chimney needs lining...
Open fire, chimney needs lining...
Author
Discussion

MajorMantra

Original Poster:

1,615 posts

131 months

Wednesday
quotequote all
Just had our chimneys swept and the one for our open fire is apparently falling apart a bit inside. (There were chunks of mortar dropping down when he swept.)

The sweep said fitting a liner as-is would necessitate ripping apart the fireplace to fit a flue gather. Does that sound right?

He suggested we get an inset log burner instead along with a liner down the chimney, which apparently would be less invasive.

I did come across a 'ceramic' slurry lining system called Eldfast, but it almost sounds too good to be true.

Thoughts? Just give in and get the log burner, or is it worth considering alternatives?

I know open fires are horribly inefficient but we do love the aesthetic.

Here's a non-recent pic of the dog enjoying it:


DKL

4,789 posts

241 months

Wednesday
quotequote all
I doubt they would fit a woodburner without a flue liner now. We have one with and one without and the one with heats up faster and burns better. Something to do with the lower volume of cold air to shift in the liner v the whole chimney.
But they'll want to do a pressure check on the chimney to make sure there aren't any cracks, apparently a camera inspection only shows big things, or so our sweep said.
Either way it isn't going to be a cheap option but a modern stove and a lined flue should give much better results.

MajorMantra

Original Poster:

1,615 posts

131 months

Wednesday
quotequote all
DKL said:
I doubt they would fit a woodburner without a flue liner now.
Oh yes, I know that, but it seems fitting a small burner would involve less surgery to the existing fireplace, even with a liner. I believe fitting the 'gather' is the issue.

alscar

7,284 posts

232 months

Wednesday
quotequote all
We had an old open fireplace ( along with 2 other existing wood burners ) but went the wood burner and liner route as just much easier.

Lotobear

8,291 posts

147 months

Wednesday
quotequote all
A woodburner and twin wall liner would certainly be the simplest and cheapest.

For an open fire you would need a grouted liner with a gather (as your sweep confirms), this often involves having to break into the flue at intervals to install spacers for the 'sausage' - generally an open fire needs a larger diameter flue too and there may be insufficient space to get the correct wall thickness of grouted liner into the existing flue whilst achieving the correct cross sectional area.

A stove is much more efficient too - you could run it with the doors open if you like the open fire effect.

LooneyTunes

8,524 posts

177 months

Wednesday
quotequote all
Is the concern carbon monoxide leakage? We have quite old chimneys and the sweep’s advice was to install monitors rather than stress too much about re-lining.

Simpo Two

90,188 posts

284 months

Wednesday
quotequote all
You say open fires are very inefficient but... I have a stove, and if I open the door a lot more heat comes out into the room...

MajorMantra

Original Poster:

1,615 posts

131 months

Wednesday
quotequote all
LooneyTunes said:
Is the concern carbon monoxide leakage? We have quite old chimneys and the sweep s advice was to install monitors rather than stress too much about re-lining.
Long-term, I guess – the concern right now is it's simply disintegrating. It's a party wall too (we're mid-terrace) so potentially could impact the neighbour as well.

The sweep told my wife something to the effect of 'if you don't sort this soon then you may need to do more comprehensive repairs, rather than just bunging a liner up there'.

Mr_J

487 posts

66 months

Wednesday
quotequote all
One of my neighbours had one of his chimneys lined with a slurry type system a few years ago.

He takes great pride in telling us about it and how fantastic it is. He's 91. I've heard the story a lot. It takes a long time for him to tell it. I've learned to tune out and can't remember any of the extensive detail he has shared.

craigthecoupe

903 posts

223 months

Thursday
quotequote all
MajorMantra said:
Long-term, I guess  the concern right now is it's simply disintegrating. It's a party wall too (we're mid-terrace) so potentially could impact the neighbour as well.

The sweep told my wife something to the effect of 'if you don't sort this soon then you may need to do more comprehensive repairs, rather than just bunging a liner up there'.
That wording sounds quite strong, sounds like the right thing to look into it sooner rather than later, especially as its a party wall. It would be a shame to lose the fireplace in that room, it looks great.
I cant help with any info on the gather, but it you go the woodburner route, I'd aim for quite a small one set back if you can, less intrusive in the room.

RustyNissanPrairie

387 posts

14 months

Thursday
quotequote all
Simpo Two said:
You say open fires are very inefficient but... I have a stove, and if I open the door a lot more heat comes out into the room...
  • a lot more radiant heat comes out into the room...
........but your fuel burns faster and the {warm} air from the room gets sucked through the stove and out of the flue. Go and stand or put a thermometer in a far corner of the room and note the difference with the stove doors open or closed. It's taken me years to get MrsRNP to accept this point!

MajorMantra

Original Poster:

1,615 posts

131 months

Thursday
quotequote all
Mr_J said:
One of my neighbours had one of his chimneys lined with a slurry type system a few years ago.

He takes great pride in telling us about it and how fantastic it is. He's 91. I've heard the story a lot. It takes a long time for him to tell it. I've learned to tune out and can't remember any of the extensive detail he has shared.
This doesn't help my decision, but it did make me laugh.