Lintel or not?
Author
Discussion

JohnnyUK

Original Poster:

1,095 posts

106 months

Wednesday 4th March
quotequote all
Hi All

We want to remove the arch in the photos below and widen the gap as much as possible.

What no one at all (including a structural surveyor!) can tell us is whether there is a lintel above the arch and if there is, where does it start and finish?

A bit like buying a dog and barking yerself, I've started to lose my patience with the so-called experts.

So....not being a builder, I've started drilling holes! eek

What I've found - the arch is made up of a shaped wooden box structure, but of course I cannot see what's above it.

So, I thought I'd drill a couple of other inspection holes and the truth is Idk what I'm looking for....

My cheap flexible camera is now stuck in the wall and I'm very cross!

How do I find someone who knows what they're doing and any clues to the lintel from my photos?






smokey mow

1,385 posts

228 months

Wednesday 4th March
quotequote all
If there’s a lintel there (and chances are that there is), the first and second holes that you drilled are too low and the third one is too far away.

A lintel will be above the highest point of the opening ( not below it) and the ends will typically extend 150mm past the edges.

OutInTheShed

14,139 posts

54 months

Wednesday 4th March
quotequote all
What's above it?
If it's supporting a brick wall, there will be a lintel or steel beam of some sort.

If it's just stud walls or floor, nothing may be needed.
I had a vacation job in a DIY store, we sold 'arch kits' made of expanded metal to plaster over.

If the house is one of a row, what have the neighbours got?
Might have been double doors when built?

You could take away plaster and plaster board etc until you find what's there, you can't guess what some loon has done in the past.
Of course if there is no lintel there, that's not the same as saying one isn't 'needed' but clearly it's stood up for a while.

Imasurv

538 posts

112 months

Wednesday 4th March
quotequote all
My starting point is to assume there will be a lintel over there of some form, likely a steel beam. The only way to be certain is to open up more of the wall. How old is the house? Older the more likely it’s loadbearing.

Below that sounds like possibly a timber arch former.

Is the wall loadbearing - are the joists above sitting on it (check the floor boards run parallel to the wall - joists sit on wall)? Is there a masonry wall above it at first floor?

Its possible, but not certain, that the floor joists run parallel to the wall but that there is a wall above (usually between front and back bedrooms, which supports ceiling joists and / or roof members).

The above is based on massive assumptions, we need more info really.

Edited by Imasurv on Wednesday 4th March 20:31

JohnnyUK

Original Poster:

1,095 posts

106 months

Wednesday 4th March
quotequote all
Thanks all

We've lived in the house since it was built in 2003 and the arch is original.

I guess it is "structural" as there is a bedroom above.

Assuming there's a lentil, I guess it would be the minimum length required for the original archway?

So, if we wanted to remove the arch and widen the gap, we'd need a longer lentil, presumably the famous RSJ (for Gavin & Stacey fans)?

LennyM1984

1,110 posts

96 months

Wednesday 4th March
quotequote all
I have recently removed an arch between our bedroom and the "dressing room" bit between our bedroom and the bog. The arch bits were just plaster over a timber former. The lintel was about 4" (ie. a 2 x 4 piece of wood) above the top of the arch. As others have said, I think you've been drilling holes in slightly the wrong places.

Mad Maximus

988 posts

31 months

Thursday 5th March
quotequote all
JohnnyUK said:
Thanks all

We've lived in the house since it was built in 2003 and the arch is original.

I guess it is "structural" as there is a bedroom above.

Assuming there's a lentil, I guess it would be the minimum length required for the original archway?

So, if we wanted to remove the arch and widen the gap, we'd need a longer lentil, presumably the famous RSJ (for Gavin & Stacey fans)?
What is directly above the arch upstairs? Floor? A wall? If so what type of wall?



If it turns out it looks to be supporting a wall upstairs you will never know for certain where whatever begins and ends without taking off some plaster properly. Drilling holes might give you an idea but that’s it.

Magooagain

13,173 posts

198 months

Thursday 5th March
quotequote all
The arch is obviously not load bearing so take it out. Whatever is above that is original so will be fine.

Simpo Two

92,433 posts

293 months

Thursday 5th March
quotequote all
JohnnyUK said:
Assuming there's a lentil, I guess it would be the minimum length required for the original archway?

So, if we wanted to remove the arch and widen the gap, we'd need a longer lentil, presumably the famous RSJ (for Gavin & Stacey fans)?
'Predictive text causes house collapse...'

I converted a doorway to an arch by getting the lentil, sorry lintel, raised and fixing a wooden box underneath. Try drilling a small hole above the middle of the arch between the top of the arch and the ceiling and see what you hit.

I suspect there was a double door there originally and he's done what I did.

I prefer arches to rectangles but the corbels are a bit ugly; you could just remove those and fair the curve in.

RotorRambler

1,271 posts

18 months

Thursday 5th March
quotequote all
The only way to be sure is to remove the boards and have a look from above.
A pain, but shouldn’t be too hard.

Anything else is guesswork. Drilling random holes, you’ll be lifting the boards anyway for the plumber!

dxg

10,562 posts

288 months

Thursday 5th March
quotequote all
Have you checked to see which way the floorboards (and therefore the joists, but at right angles) run upstairs?

Given that the walls either side are blockwork, I'm going to say there's a fair chance the wall is loadbearing, with the joists running through the arch (from foreground of image to background) rather than across it (left to right in the image). So, there will be a lintel of some kind. However, I would be beyond amazed if the arch itself is loadbearing - it looks entirely decorative to me. I'm guessing the house is from the 70s or 80s?

Plus4Four#

240 posts

9 months

Thursday 5th March
quotequote all
We removed a dividing wall to create a larger room instead of two rooms. A builder did the work as part of a bigger one. He checked the area above, looked at joist direction, what was above, by cutting away the ceiling as a repair would have been needed anyway. Result was a non-supporting timber framed wall so no lintel needed. If one was needed then it would have been put in. Wall was removed, ceiling repaired and the whole ceiling re-skimmed. A small crack appeared at ajoing in the repair after several months but that was cured. No other issues after 9 years.
The arch in question.....do a proper job cutting access to check if load bearing. You will be finding out the scope of the job and even if you don't proceed a repair will be needed anyway. Don't trust to luck! Don't guess! Don't assume!

LooneyTunes

9,287 posts

186 months

Thursday 5th March
quotequote all
There are already three holes in the wall now. Why not make another above the arch, where any lintel would actually be?

Landlubber

993 posts

77 months

Thursday 5th March
quotequote all
LooneyTunes said:
There are already three holes in the wall now. Why not make another above the arch, where any lintel would actually be?
It's where mine is.

andy43

13,027 posts

282 months

Thursday 5th March
quotequote all
If there's no solid wall above it taking the floor up directly above the arch is the only way to check which way the joists run.
A suitably specced 150 UB for floor joists (I'm guessing at that) will be a lot less expensive than a bigger steel for joists and a brick wall.

Swervin_Mervin

4,956 posts

266 months

Thursday 5th March
quotequote all
andy43 said:
If there's no solid wall above it taking the floor up directly above the arch is the only way to check which way the joists run.
A suitably specced 150 UB for floor joists (I'm guessing at that) will be a lot less expensive than a bigger steel for joists and a brick wall.
This.

Take upstairs carpet up and observe where the boarding is nailed down. That should tell you the direction of the joists. My guess is that for a new build the opening won't be structural - the joists will likely run across and that arch will just be boarding.

Alternatively, cut another inspection hole further along the arch and further up.

Simpo Two

92,433 posts

293 months

Thursday 5th March
quotequote all
Swervin_Mervin said:
Alternatively, cut another inspection hole further along the arch and further up.
It doesn't need an inspection hole; a simple masonry drill will tell you if you've hit a lintel because lintels are 1,000x harder than plaster.

andy43

13,027 posts

282 months

Thursday 5th March
quotequote all
Simpo Two said:
Swervin_Mervin said:
Alternatively, cut another inspection hole further along the arch and further up.
It doesn't need an inspection hole; a simple masonry drill will tell you if you've hit a lintel because lintels are 1,000x harder than plaster.
I think some step ladders or a dining chair should be mentioned here too, so the next half a dozen holes are a bit higher up.
Always best to use a 75mm holesaw too, so you can fill the holes with downlighters if the arch has to stay.

JohnnyUK

Original Poster:

1,095 posts

106 months

Thursday 5th March
quotequote all
Thanks all - and yes, lintel, not lentil! beer

Will have another go at the weekend and let you know.

If you read about me being crushed, I blame you! wink

Simpo Two

92,433 posts

293 months

Thursday 5th March
quotequote all
andy43 said:
Always best to use a 75mm holesaw too, so you can fill the holes with downlighters if the arch has to stay.
Or set up an owl sanctuary nuts