House Architecture?
Author
Discussion

Fittster

Original Poster:

20,120 posts

236 months

Friday 16th July 2010
quotequote all
Why is the architecture of British housing so dull? If I go and look at a new build estate I pretty much know what I'm going to see before I turn up and it's not very inspiring.

I've come up with 3 possible causes.

A) The buying public have very conservative taste, deviate from the norm and the property is going to be very difficult to sell.

I posted this 1960s house (Citroen SM in one of the pics) and the views posted were pretty negative.
The 1960s house as an alternative to a 1930s semi or a new 'executive' property I didn't think it was that bad!

B Planning permission is very difficult on anything outside the norm so it's not worth the trouble unless you are both determined and rich enough to fight the battle. Rowan Atkinson is struggling to get permission for a house he wants to build.
http://swns.com/rowan-atkinson-riles-neighbours-ov...

C It's much more expensive to build something unusual so they aren't popular on a value front to most buyers when compared to more typical properties.


Any house builders/architects want to give me the inside view?

Edited by Fittster on Friday 16th July 12:56

Red&WhiteMonkey

8,603 posts

205 months

Friday 16th July 2010
quotequote all
The simple answer is that the market has conversative (not in the political sense) views and developers will normally not risk building something they don't think there is a market for.

rsv gone!

11,288 posts

264 months

Friday 16th July 2010
quotequote all
Fittster said:
I posted this 1960s house (Citroen SM in one of the pics) and the views posted were pretty negative.
The 1960s house as an alternative to a 1930s semi or a new 'executive' property I didn't think it was that bad!
That looks like council accommodation. OK, it was 'architect designed' but the design looks old.

People (and planners) want pitched roofs and brick construction as that is what they're used to. Depart much from this and the build cost goes up, so developers won't be interested.

shirt

25,033 posts

224 months

Friday 16th July 2010
quotequote all
in short, planning. It's far and away the biggest bugbear of any architect I know.

on a larger scale, the likes of wimpey etc. stick to traditional styles as its what they know, what their builders know, and what they can cost accurately.

herbialfa

1,489 posts

225 months

Friday 16th July 2010
quotequote all
The big house builders have various types of houses/ bungalows on their Pcs.

Its a simple drop & drag when it come to site layouts.

Every house type will be costed right down to the last light bulb!

Thats why all these new estates are the same.

Going outside conventional planning like RW is against policy! Simples.

Was it Jamie Redknapp that has just been kicked into touch recently for his Teletubbies ECO home?

Just because you have money doesn't give you the right to build what you want where you want!

I'm sure TESCOS have more money than them 2 put together and they struggle for years!

However, yes I agree, there is a lack of design on most new build projects that Wimpey/ Permissons etc propose!

Fittster

Original Poster:

20,120 posts

236 months

Friday 16th July 2010
quotequote all
rsv gone! said:
Fittster said:
I posted this 1960s house (Citroen SM in one of the pics) and the views posted were pretty negative.
The 1960s house as an alternative to a 1930s semi or a new 'executive' property I didn't think it was that bad!
That looks like council accommodation. OK, it was 'architect designed' but the design looks old.
I know that property won't appeal to most people (I think it's been on the market a while, I'm just having a retro fetish day) but the point is for most people, say with between 600K-200K to spend on a property there isn't a great range of styles available in most towns/cities.

I can buy lots of different styles of cars, clothes, gadgets but when it comes to the biggest purchase most of us will ever make there isn't a huge range of designs available.

herbialfa

1,489 posts

225 months

Friday 16th July 2010
quotequote all
Agreed! Purely because nowadays on big developments its all copy & paste!

I have 9 plots on the go at the moment with 4 different plot types. Not my choice but the developers choice purely down to costings!

Smiler.

11,752 posts

253 months

Friday 16th July 2010
quotequote all
Is it much better in the denser parts of Europe though?

I also think parts of the house-building industry over here are still in the '30, only sans-flair (think art deco).

Also, the quality of the builds in the UK is, imo, shocking.

Then there's Building Regs.

I think Mr Bean's proposal doesn't look too bad, but I wonder how it will wear, 20yrs down the road. I've seen some buildings which look great when new, but dreadful years on.

herbialfa

1,489 posts

225 months

Friday 16th July 2010
quotequote all
Holland take the lead in new developments by a long mile!

Dupont666

22,513 posts

215 months

Friday 16th July 2010
quotequote all
yet no mention of these:





Both of which can be bought in the right location for up to £600k

Smiler.

11,752 posts

253 months

Friday 16th July 2010
quotequote all
herbialfa said:
Holland take the lead in new developments by a long mile!
In Europe, the average sparks will design & install automated controls systems (well according to some manufacturers).

Over here, its all sockets & twin & earth.

arfur sleep

1,166 posts

242 months

Friday 16th July 2010
quotequote all
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/property/propertynews/7...

Even when you try and do something inspirational and exciting the NIMBYs get all arsey

Tuna

19,930 posts

307 months

Friday 16th July 2010
quotequote all
The planning system is abysmal, the government aren't interested in promoting good architecture, the large part of the population think that good design is what they do on Changing Rooms and think that real architects cost too much. On top of that, we have a NIMBY culture (coddled by the planning system) and big developers know that you don't loose orders by playing safe.

Fittster

Original Poster:

20,120 posts

236 months

Friday 16th July 2010
quotequote all
Just found an ace website for modern properties for sale in the UK.

http://www.themodernhouse.net/tmh/

Sam_68

9,939 posts

268 months

Sunday 18th July 2010
quotequote all
You've pretty much got it with your original list.
a) For the same reason that you see several hundred Eurobox repmobiles for every really interesting car on the roads. People (and housebuilders) like to play it safe, particularly with something that reprsents such a massive investment for most people.
b) Planners often aren't brave enough to support more adventurous design, and Planning committees are usually populated by the lowest form of lowest common denominator, in the form of interfering busy-bodies with little or no architectural training.
c) When it comes to large-scale housebuilding, in particular, design is very cost-sensitive and there is a huge difference between the cost of standard components and solutions, and bespoke ones.