'Surplus' giraffe put down at Copenhagen Zoo
Discussion
Story in mail today that Longleat put to sleep a young lioness ans some cubs, due to aggression! (and overbreeding apparently)
Difficult to get the full story but sounds pretty atrocious either way. I read about the giraffe earlier. Zoo's are a law unto themselves. Not sure how the inbreeding was allowed to happen in the first place and why did they wait til he was 18 months old to destroy him?
Difficult to get the full story but sounds pretty atrocious either way. I read about the giraffe earlier. Zoo's are a law unto themselves. Not sure how the inbreeding was allowed to happen in the first place and why did they wait til he was 18 months old to destroy him?
It's not tragic or disgraceful the lioness was genetically flawed due to massive inbreeding. Herself and her cubs had big quality of life issues and so had to be put down on grounds of welfare. And I believe there was a similar reason for not keeping the giraffe as it was too closely related to breed from. To be fair it was fed to the lions and did provide good education to the kids watching the dissection. It's a shame it had to be euthanised but it probably raised a lot of attention about the zoo and the animals it keeps which may hopefully help in the long run. Whether you believe in zoos or not is another debate.
Edited by GokTweed on Tuesday 11th February 21:24
So 20-30 animals at that zoo being destroyed every year!!!!!!!! They clearly do not have a very good breeding programme in place, or are they allowing this over / in-breeding purely to feed the lions?
If they didn't want him, then re-home to the many centres that were offering to take him, or at least castrate him. To allow him to get to 18 months and then just destroy him is barbaric just to keep their breeding gene strong. There was nothing preventing him going to a new home and breeding or living out his life happy and alive.
They should be ashamed of themselves.
If they didn't want him, then re-home to the many centres that were offering to take him, or at least castrate him. To allow him to get to 18 months and then just destroy him is barbaric just to keep their breeding gene strong. There was nothing preventing him going to a new home and breeding or living out his life happy and alive.
They should be ashamed of themselves.
Turbodiesel1976 said:
This story has pissed me off alot - he looked like a lovely giraffe,
Have you ever seen a giraffe and thought "he looks like a wrong 'un?"They all look lovely. Regardless of the rights and wrongs of the situation, I don't think cuteness should be a deciding factor. If they'd destroyed a nest of rare parasitic wasps, no one would give two hoots. That's what's wrong!
Gassing Station | All Creatures Great & Small | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff



king a