Jeremy Clarkson / Jemima Khan : Any truth in the rumours?

[cardigankid]

The rumour from the Twitter site is that Jemima Khan took out a superinjunction to prevent disclosure of an alleged 'affair' with Jeremy Clarkson. It's now on the Torygraph website. Any truth in it?

Doesn't sound pretty.

[Liquid Knight]

No comment.

[GALLARDOGUY]

I bloody hope not. She's lovely. What would she see in him?

[Oldandslow]

Sounds unlikely. Another smear attempt by members of the press not fond of Clarkson?

Aside from the damage to his family I'd say "High five Jezza" she's a fox.

[cardigankid]

I seem to have been mistaken - see similar thread in News section, it's all there! All the same, I struggle to believe this. Such a pretty little thing, such a gargantuan monster. Makes you shudder!!

[cardigankid]

Oldandslow said:

Another smear attempt by members of the press not fond of Clarkson?

Not impossible.

[Truckosaurus]

The Khan/Clarkson rumour is untrue, but that is not to suggest that there aren't other Clarkson related stories that cannot be legally printed.

[marshalla]

http://www.pistonheads.com/gassing/topic.asp?h=0&a...

[Liquid Knight]

That Clarkson/Gaga/Molem threesome story could be true?

[AlVal]

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/twitter/8502...

[soad]

Boy, she's yummy. That is all

[MacGee]

Not a chance..hes an ugly tt and she aint...

[Hugo a Gogo]

http://www.thedailymash.co.uk/news/celebrity/giggs...

[marcosgt]

If I was Clarkson, I'd probably have posted that rumour myself!

M.

[jake15919]

If there is a story in a newspaper that names someone rumoured to have taken out a super injunction then by definition the rumour must be untrue. I think.

[Big Al.]

Thread already running here.

http://www.pistonheads.com/gassing/topic.asp?h=0&a...