Petra Ecclestone - Sunday Times
Petra Ecclestone - Sunday Times
Author
Discussion

dr_gn

Original Poster:

16,924 posts

213 months

Sunday 29th April 2012
quotequote all
Probably the wrong forum, but what the hell...

Anyone bring themselves to read all the way through Petra (ETA, or was it the other one? whatever) Ecclestone's "A life in the day" in todays Sunday Times Magazine?

Oh dear, oh dear, oh dear.

Edited by dr_gn on Sunday 29th April 21:05

Boarder1

196 posts

276 months

Sunday 29th April 2012
quotequote all
I read the article, all i could think "is she for real?".

AAGR

918 posts

190 months

Sunday 29th April 2012
quotequote all
The word 'spoilt brat' comes to mind. At least I don't work for Bernie, so I don't have to be nice about her ....


anonymous-user

83 months

Sunday 29th April 2012
quotequote all
used to read the times, but now can't Rupert Murdoch slimey face out my mind so luckily don't have to put myself through some of the drivel they have in the paper.

Shaw Tarse

31,886 posts

232 months

Sunday 29th April 2012
quotequote all
I didn't see the article, but one of Bernies daughters had a tv show a while ago, totally not reality TV!

AAGR

918 posts

190 months

Sunday 29th April 2012
quotequote all
Consider her running a check-out station at Tescos .... there, does that make you feel better ?

GTIR

24,741 posts

295 months

Sunday 29th April 2012
quotequote all
Was it Petra?

Anyhoo, I read it.
I didn't think she was any different to any other daughter or son of a very wealthy mogul.

She's only guilty of being naive to the "real" world but why would she know about normal working class folk?

CoolHands

23,358 posts

224 months

Sunday 29th April 2012
quotequote all
I couldn't read anything about that spoilt bh. What gets me is why the hell do the papers give her any publicity? I mean she doesn't even do anything interesting. At all.

DukeDickson

4,968 posts

242 months

Sunday 29th April 2012
quotequote all
GTIR said:
Was it Petra?

Anyhoo, I read it.
I didn't think she was any different to any other daughter or son of a very wealthy mogul.

She's only guilty of being naive to the "real" world but why would she know about normal working class folk?
Bingo - She really has nil experience of much else & doesn't exactly have the greatest role models for parents. The odds of her being much different are a touch on the slim side.

Digger

16,800 posts

220 months

Monday 30th April 2012
quotequote all
I did cringe at the last but one paragaph, or maybe she meant it.

Du1point8

22,852 posts

221 months

Monday 30th April 2012
quotequote all
anyone going to give an overview of what she said?

caraddict

1,092 posts

173 months

Monday 30th April 2012
quotequote all
I think it's a real challenge for those wealthy parents to teach their children healthy ethics.

Usually, it goes something like this:
- First generation works hard and builds something significant.
- Second generation is a little bit spoiled (well, not in the case above, massively spoiled), but has seen their parents struggle to build the empire and therefore they're still a little protective of and careful for their wealth.
- Third generation has not seen what the first and second generation have, and from now on the generations start losing control...

Man, the upper class sounds fun and boring at the same time.

dr_gn

Original Poster:

16,924 posts

213 months

Monday 30th April 2012
quotequote all
Du1point8 said:
anyone going to give an overview of what she said?
Sorry, I can't read it again.

rhinochopig

17,932 posts

227 months

Monday 30th April 2012
quotequote all
caraddict said:
I think it's a real challenge for those wealthy parents to teach their children healthy ethics.

Usually, it goes something like this:
- First generation works hard and builds something significant.
- Second generation is a little bit spoiled (well, not in the case above, massively spoiled), but has seen their parents struggle to build the empire and therefore they're still a little protective of and careful for their wealth.
- Third generation has not seen what the first and second generation have, and from now on the generations start losing control...

Man, the upper class sounds fun and boring at the same time.
There is one very wealthy individual - who I can't remember for the life of me - who has said that his kids won't get any of his wealth and that if they do a job that is poorly paid but something they want to do he will match their salary several times over. I quite liked that approach. They'll never be poor but they'll also understand the value - as best you can in that environ - of money.

Pork

9,455 posts

263 months

Monday 30th April 2012
quotequote all
rhinochopig said:
There is one very wealthy individual - who I can't remember for the life of me - who has said that his kids won't get any of his wealth and that if they do a job that is poorly paid but something they want to do he will match their salary several times over. I quite liked that approach. They'll never be poor but they'll also understand the value - as best you can in that environ - of money.
Wasn't that Bill Gates?

Grey Ghost

4,610 posts

249 months

Monday 30th April 2012
quotequote all
rhinochopig said:
There is one very wealthy individual - who I can't remember for the life of me - who has said that his kids won't get any of his wealth and that if they do a job that is poorly paid but something they want to do he will match their salary several times over. I quite liked that approach. They'll never be poor but they'll also understand the value - as best you can in that environ - of money.
I think that is Peter Jones from Dragon's Den. I believe he has set up a series of trust funds for his children that match their actual earnings from their jobs and then offer extra incentives if they achieve a professional qualification (lawyer, accountant etc) or enter medical arena.

Podie

46,649 posts

304 months

Monday 30th April 2012
quotequote all
It was the fact "she had to work hard" and "got up at 7:30am"... oooh...a lie in!

dr_gn

Original Poster:

16,924 posts

213 months

Monday 30th April 2012
quotequote all
rhinochopig said:
caraddict said:
I think it's a real challenge for those wealthy parents to teach their children healthy ethics.

Usually, it goes something like this:
- First generation works hard and builds something significant.
- Second generation is a little bit spoiled (well, not in the case above, massively spoiled), but has seen their parents struggle to build the empire and therefore they're still a little protective of and careful for their wealth.
- Third generation has not seen what the first and second generation have, and from now on the generations start losing control...

Man, the upper class sounds fun and boring at the same time.
There is one very wealthy individual - who I can't remember for the life of me - who has said that his kids won't get any of his wealth and that if they do a job that is poorly paid but something they want to do he will match their salary several times over. I quite liked that approach. They'll never be poor but they'll also understand the value - as best you can in that environ - of money.
I thought that it was an interesting insight into how her parents brought her up, as much as her resultant rather obnoxious character.

She seems to like having servants...

Podie

46,649 posts

304 months

Monday 30th April 2012
quotequote all
Hasn't Bill Gates said all his money is goin to charity?

retrobob

3,191 posts

218 months

Monday 30th April 2012
quotequote all
Do those Ecclestone girls eventually 'inherit' F1?