Am I racist?
TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED
Author
Discussion

AClownsPocket

Original Poster:

899 posts

189 months

Monday 23rd December 2013
quotequote all
I was talking to work colleagues the other day about the little fella on the marmalade jars. I remembered as kids we referred to him as a gollywog. In my mind, that described the character, rather than being derogatory towards colour. I've never really thought about it that way.

Anyhoo, a colleague takes offence and accuses me of being racist and I get hauled into the managers office where I am asked to explain my comments.

I pointed out the context of the discussion and how what I believed he was called. I was let off with an informal warning to be more careful around more 'senstivie' souls.

Now, my question is as I still don't understand. Does Gollywog refer to that particular character on the jar, or is it a general derogatory term. I admit to being naive here as I've never ever been called a racist before and was pretty staggered that someone that barely knows me would make that judgement.

Tried reading about it on the web, but as per usual on all things web, there is conflicting information.

Z4monster

1,442 posts

290 months

Monday 23rd December 2013
quotequote all
They are called Gollys nowadays.

The offensive bit was removed when PC arrived.

Personally they will always be Gollywogs and to me have nothing whatsoever to do with a persons skin colour but that is probably what they are supposed to represent.

I had one as a kid which had big pearl coloured buttons for eyes. It used to scare the ste out of me and I never liked it really.

AndyBrew

2,774 posts

249 months

Monday 23rd December 2013
quotequote all
3, 2, 1....

iva cosworth

44,044 posts

193 months

Monday 23rd December 2013
quotequote all
Wog was always a derogatory term for coloured people which i also believe is also

now unacceptable in these PC times.....confused

Not sure how the jam people got away with it even back then.

anonymous-user

84 months

Monday 23rd December 2013
quotequote all
It's not really appropriate and there's a reason it was removed from the jars a long time ago. There was also a furniture polish called " Brown" but it no longer exists for the same reason. Doesn't make you racist, just naive.



Edited by anonymous-user on Monday 23 December 20:05

Janesy B

2,625 posts

216 months

Monday 23rd December 2013
quotequote all
Given the context of the conversation, being pulled up on something like that is pretty pathetic.

steveT350C

6,728 posts

191 months

Monday 23rd December 2013
quotequote all
Westernised Oriental Gentleman

anonymous-user

84 months

Monday 23rd December 2013
quotequote all
iva cosworth said:
Wog was always a derogatory term for coloured people
There are so many things wrong with this sentence!

GALLARDOGUY

8,160 posts

249 months

Monday 23rd December 2013
quotequote all
Your colleague is a fking tt.

That's all I have to say on the matter.

Piersman2

6,676 posts

229 months

Monday 23rd December 2013
quotequote all
I'm with you on this one. When I was a kid you could get little gollywog badges and other bits and pieces if you collected enough Robinsons jam tokens. It never crossed my mind at the time that there was any derogatory racial associations to the character.

But... time's moved on and for whatever reason that character has become unacceptable and one has to be cautious about even mentioning the word 'gollywog' for fear of upsetting someone regardless of the context of it's use.

No doubt we'll be accused of being racist just for this thread! laugh

jimbop1

2,441 posts

234 months

Monday 23rd December 2013
quotequote all
wormus said:
It's not really appropriate and there's a reason it was removed from the jars a long time ago. There was also a furniture polish called " Brown" but it no longer exists for the same reason. Doesn't make you racist, just naive.



Edited by wormus on Monday 23 December 20:05
It's not racist one bit nor does it make you naive!

It's just a sign how bad this country is becoming. It's pathetic and quite sad really!

selym

9,581 posts

201 months

Monday 23rd December 2013
quotequote all
jimbop1 said:
wormus said:
It's not really appropriate and there's a reason it was removed from the jars a long time ago. There was also a furniture polish called " Brown" but it no longer exists for the same reason. Doesn't make you racist, just naive.



Edited by wormus on Monday 23 December 20:05
It's not racist one bit nor does it make you naive!

It's just a sign how bad this country is becoming. It's pathetic and quite sad really!
The 'naive' comment was just a standard PH addendum.

Six Fiend

6,067 posts

245 months

Monday 23rd December 2013
quotequote all
My Golly was one of my very favourite cuddly toys. He was just a toy, not a person.

He's rather worn now and lives in a box at my mother's house.

OP your colleague as a twit for not understanding context - but these days many many people are equally bereft of such ability!

lincsls2

4,084 posts

170 months

Monday 23rd December 2013
quotequote all
No you are not being racist. Just an over sensitive soul you've upset.
The little fella on the marmalade jars was always referred to as a Gollywog. When I was growing up, my Nana knitted me what she called Gollywog and I treasure it.
It was never meant has offensive or racist however you need to tread very carefully in todays PC gone mad world.
Fact is Gollywogs are part of human history, nothing will change that.

Butter Face

34,948 posts

190 months

Monday 23rd December 2013
quotequote all
They were always called Gollywogs when I was young too.


Caddyshack

14,991 posts

236 months

Monday 23rd December 2013
quotequote all
To call the poster naive is just as offensive when they openly and honestly asked for opinion. I don't believe they are racist or naive, I too had a gollywog doll and did not correlate anything to do with race, in fact I cared for it so isn't that the opposite?

calibrax

4,788 posts

241 months

Monday 23rd December 2013
quotequote all
These people who take offence need to look up the word "pejorative" in the dictionary and understand it.

Simply saying a word does not make it racist AT ALL. What DOES makes it racist is the INTENT of the person using the word. If it's used to deliberately insult someone or to refer to someone in a negative way, then yes, that is racism.

chilistrucker

4,543 posts

181 months

Monday 23rd December 2013
quotequote all
As a kid, I just thought it was a character name, I certainly didn't pick up on the colour of said character snd the reference to "wog"
And you got a warning, I'd have refused to accept the warning.

I can't stand the "N" word, find it a very derogatory term, and always find it odd that so many rappers use it so freely or am I missing something?

rehab71

3,362 posts

220 months

Monday 23rd December 2013
quotequote all
Coloured? FFS it's 'Black people'

RobM77

35,349 posts

264 months

Monday 23rd December 2013
quotequote all
You are absolutely not being racist in any way, that's ridiculous. Anyone pulling the racist card on you is not 'sensitive' at all, they're just looking for an excuse to make you look bad and make them feel oppressed - and that's very poor form in a social situation in an office if you ask me. If you call someone a GW or a W, then of course, that's racist, but the little guy on the jam jars was called a GW - that's the name of the toy! Now it's a racist toy from a bygone era, for sure, but it's not racist to identify it - racism is a form of hatred and so therefore requires a person to be a victim. To be honest you weren't even calling the toy a GW, you were identifying it as 'GW', the fictional jam jar character.

Edited by RobM77 on Monday 23 December 20:23

TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED