Speeding up your reading
Speeding up your reading
Author
Discussion

bigandclever

Original Poster:

14,359 posts

267 months

Friday 7th March 2014
quotequote all
A clever way of speeding up reading for the masses?

blurb nicked from a webpage said:
what Spritz does differently (and brilliantly) is manipulate the format of the words to more appropriately line them up with the eye’s natural motion of reading. The “Optimal Recognition Point” (ORP) is slightly left of the center of each word, and is the precise point at which our brain deciphers each jumble of letters. The unique aspect of Spritz is that it identifies the ORP of each word, makes that letter red and presents all of the ORPs at the same space on the screen. In this way, our eyes don’t move at all as we see the words, and we can therefore process information instantaneously rather than spend time decoding each word.
For example ...

250 words per minute



500 words per minute



I'm definitely missing some of the words at 500 per minute, my brain can't cope laugh But, ignoring the pleasure of reading for reading's sake, this seems a clever way of getting through more information, more quickly and (supposedly) without affecting comprehension.

http://www.spritzinc.com/the-science/


RizzoTheRat

28,901 posts

221 months

Friday 7th March 2014
quotequote all
I saw this last night, and struggled at 500 wpm. Then I reread the slower ones and went back to the 500 wpm and found it a bit easier. Reading it now it seem easier still so I guess you could get used to it.

I'm not 100% sure of the use though, I tend read either novels for enjoyment, or technical stuff for work. I can't see the point of reading a novel any faster as I'll just need to find a new one when I finish, and for technical stuff I often need to think about it rather than just absorb the words.

talksthetorque

10,821 posts

164 months

Friday 7th March 2014
quotequote all
Down to 125wpm as I had to read it four times to identify that a few words are given in the wrong order near the end and the word 'time' seems to be missing.

singlecoil

35,831 posts

275 months

Friday 7th March 2014
quotequote all
RizzoTheRat said:
I saw this last night, and struggled at 500 wpm. Then I reread the slower ones and went back to the 500 wpm and found it a bit easier. Reading it now it seem easier still so I guess you could get used to it.

I'm not 100% sure of the use though, I tend read either novels for enjoyment, or technical stuff for work. I can't see the point of reading a novel any faster as I'll just need to find a new one when I finish, and for technical stuff I often need to think about it rather than just absorb the words.
This is very true. I find when reading technical stuff that I can very easily tune out, and read the words without comprehending them. I need to use tricks to make sure the meaning of the words goes in, such as carrying out the task being described (when using software, for instance) or making notes or, if it's my own book, highlighting key words and phrases.

bigandclever

Original Poster:

14,359 posts

267 months

Friday 7th March 2014
quotequote all
talksthetorque said:
Down to 125wpm as I had to read it four times to identify that a few words are given in the wrong order near the end and the word 'time' seems to be missing.
I've been sad enough to use an app to check that there were words missed out and it wasn't just me missing them. There were a few omissions ... my suggested missing words in []

with only [a] small [amount] of spritzing
the [time] to [give] it [a] try
and [telling] everyone that

That'd speed things up, can't imagine it helps comprehension though.

Impasse

15,099 posts

270 months

Friday 7th March 2014
quotequote all
It's no good for me. I can't run my finger along the bottom of the words as I sound them out.

Hoofy

80,056 posts

311 months

Friday 7th March 2014
quotequote all
Have I understood this right? It's of no use to me if I pick up a real book?

And to read something, if I'm short on time, I'd have to pass it through some kind of software?

If I'm short on time, I'll just get my computer to read to me whilst I'm doing something else, then!

blindswelledrat

25,257 posts

261 months

Friday 7th March 2014
quotequote all
Hoofy said:
Have I understood this right? It's of no use to me if I pick up a real book?

And to read something, if I'm short on time, I'd have to pass it through some kind of software?

If I'm short on time, I'll just get my computer to read to me whilst I'm doing something else, then!
Does seem to be the case. At first I thought it taught you to read quicker but instead it doesn't. Just means you don't have to move your eyes so you can process it quicker. What a completely pointless load of bks.

talksthetorque

10,821 posts

164 months

Friday 7th March 2014
quotequote all
If you use it for erotic novels will it give you premature ejaculation?

Hoofy

80,056 posts

311 months

Friday 7th March 2014
quotequote all
blindswelledrat said:
What a completely pointless load of bks.
hehe I was attempting to remain polite.

Hoofy

80,056 posts

311 months

Friday 7th March 2014
quotequote all
Impasse said:
It's no good for me. I can't run my finger along the bottom of the words as I sound them out.
Just hold your finger under the word. It runs the words along the top of your finger. Magic!

Cotty

42,226 posts

313 months

Friday 7th March 2014
quotequote all
How do you scroll back if you want to re-read the previous line.

Art0ir

9,423 posts

199 months

Friday 7th March 2014
quotequote all
Idea needs some work, the concept is awesome though.

GetCarter

31,246 posts

308 months

Friday 7th March 2014
quotequote all
500 seems piss easy here. Got it first time. Maybe it's my internet connection wink

ETA... two others here just got it straight up... what's the problem folks?

Maybe being old sts, we've just read so much more than you young people, so word shapes just hit the spot. I don't think I'd have a problem at 750+ ... 500 is easy peezy

Edited by GetCarter on Friday 7th March 14:17

RobbieKB

7,715 posts

212 months

Friday 7th March 2014
quotequote all
I'm not sure when I'd use this. When I read fiction I do it to relax, not sit there concentrating, eyes fixed and irises juddering like a sniper on cocaine. When I read academic texts, it's not something you can breeze over to get the gist of; it usually takes a few reads to grasp the argument. Perhaps this might be useful for news articles I guess.

Very interesting concept nonetheless.

Bullett

11,180 posts

213 months

Friday 7th March 2014
quotequote all
Interesting.

I have the opposite view. I have to read lots of technical documents searching for specific solutions and problems for projects I am on. Searching for key words often works but is not always possible. And skimming mean I miss stuff.
I would use this to read documents more fully in less time as context is often key. It would also stop me getting distracted if I'm not finding what I want.




GTIR

24,741 posts

295 months

Friday 7th March 2014
quotequote all
I thought this thread was about improving traffic flow in Reading town centre.

Am disappoint.

Bullett

11,180 posts

213 months

Friday 7th March 2014
quotequote all
GTIR said:
I thought this thread was about improving traffic flow in Reading town centre.

Am disappoint.
That is a problem beyond the ability of current knowledge.

GetCarter

31,246 posts

308 months

Friday 7th March 2014
quotequote all
Having lived in Reading, the only way of speeding any improvement is to get out. wink

LordGrover

34,164 posts

241 months

Friday 7th March 2014
quotequote all
Like it. After just a few minutes 'speeding up', 600 wpm is easy.
However, I found that after just a minutes my (tired) eyes were strained. I feel unable to even blink so ended up staring which isn't very nice.