Neighbour Adopted Our Cat - Now It's Ill...
Neighbour Adopted Our Cat - Now It's Ill...
Author
Discussion

V8RX7

Original Poster:

28,982 posts

294 months

Thursday 10th September 2015
quotequote all
We bought a house after the owner died and there were two cats.

We said we'd carry on feeding them rather than them going to the cats home as they were already 9 and they were used to being in the countryside.

We moved them outside as we have a dog who, it turns out, hates cats.

One cat soon got tired of being chased all the time and relocated to a neighbour's farm.

They called us to collect him, which we did a few times but they have food out and no dog so it was obvious he'd end up there.

So they've had him on and off for a year and we haven't even seen him for two months - tonight they called to say he's ill would we pick him up and take him to the vet.

I said I would but I'd only be putting him down as he's not really my cat. The neighbour took exception to this and took the cat herself then called us to say it's been put down.

So my question is:

Should I offer to pay ?

Before anyone asks there are no pictures of the neighbour, nor the now deceased cat.

LordJammy

3,114 posts

220 months

Thursday 10th September 2015
quotequote all
No

davhill

5,263 posts

215 months

Thursday 10th September 2015
quotequote all
I reckon this. You agreed to keep feeding said mog so in essence you adopted it. The cat then went freelancing to accommodate your dog and the neighbour did it a kindness my taking it in. However as it essentially remained 'yours' and was obviously poorly enough for euthanasia, your neighbour was kind to it again. Moreover, he/she saved you a trip to the vet. It'd be gentlemanly to respond by picking up the tab.

Leptons

5,493 posts

207 months

Thursday 10th September 2015
quotequote all
Pic of the now deceased cat?

soad

34,751 posts

207 months

Thursday 10th September 2015
quotequote all
Vet's fees are nornally quite high, yes?

Offer to pay (a decent thing to do imho)...as not exactly neighbour's cat.

bearman68

4,942 posts

163 months

Thursday 10th September 2015
quotequote all
V8RX7 said:
W

I said I would but I'd only be putting him down as he's not really my cat. The neighbour took exception to this and took the cat herself then called us to say it's been put down.
Mmmm I'm thinking something went wrong here.... That's probably the thing to think about.
As others have said, it's the relationship thing.

Best of luck

V8RX7

Original Poster:

28,982 posts

294 months

Thursday 10th September 2015
quotequote all
My thoughts are that I took over ownership by feeding it.

She then took over ownership by feeding it.

Had it been healthy I have no doubt she'd have fed it for the next 5+ yrs and we'd never have seen it again.

However I do agree that I'd rather not fall out with a neighbour - although they are 300+m away.

I suspect we have fallen out already as she was shocked that "you won't take responsibility for your cat" after I said I'd only pay to put it down - which IMO, is taking responsibility.

Sorry but I'm not emotionally attached to an inherited old cat that I've rarely seen.

How much is it to put down a cat ?

Minemapper

933 posts

187 months

Thursday 10th September 2015
quotequote all
We had a similar situation where one of our neighbours 5 cats decided he preferred our house to theirs. After about 2 years, he needed to go to the vet after a nocturnal altercation. We paid. Came time to move, and the neighbours came over and said we could take him if we wanted to. We still have him and he's well and truly decided that we are worthy of continuing to feed him.

Vaud

59,981 posts

186 months

Thursday 10th September 2015
quotequote all
£38 for my cat last year (euthanised and cremated, no return of ashes)

haggishunter

1,315 posts

274 months

Thursday 10th September 2015
quotequote all
V8RX7 said:
We bought a house after the owner died and there were two cats.

We said we'd carry on feeding them rather than them going to the cats home as they were already 9 and they were used to being in the countryside.

We moved them outside as we have a dog who, it turns out, hates cats.

One cat soon got tired of being chased all the time and relocated to a neighbour's farm.

They called us to collect him, which we did a few times but they have food out and no dog so it was obvious he'd end up there.

So they've had him on and off for a year and we haven't even seen him for two months - tonight they called to say he's ill would we pick him up and take him to the vet.

I said I would but I'd only be putting him down as he's not really my cat. The neighbour took exception to this and took the cat herself then called us to say it's been put down.

So my question is:

Should I offer to pay ?

Before anyone asks there are no pictures of the neighbour, nor the now deceased cat.
You've asked which means that you think you should but want an excuse not to, if you can afford it then pay it and if you can't then discuss it with the neighbour and I'm sure they will help you out.

williamp

20,464 posts

304 months

Thursday 10th September 2015
quotequote all
davhill said:
I reckon this. You agreed to keep feeding said mog so in essence you adopted it. The cat then went freelancing to accommodate your dog and the neighbour did it a kindness my taking it in. However as it essentially remained 'yours' and was obviously poorly enough for euthanasia, your neighbour was kind to it again. Moreover, he/she saved you a trip to the vet. It'd be gentlemanly to respond by picking up the tab.
Sorry op but I agree with thids. And having a neighbour whom you get on with is worth more then a vet bill.

Baryonyx

18,294 posts

190 months

Friday 11th September 2015
quotequote all
Tell her to fk off.

Itsallicanafford

2,963 posts

190 months

Friday 11th September 2015
quotequote all
Next time you see your neighbour wear a very large bandage around your head, explain you have 'had a fall', make sure to look abit vacant. When challenged about said cat, deny all knowledge of ever owning a cat....


zarjaz1991

6,918 posts

154 months

Friday 11th September 2015
quotequote all
Unless you're completely skint, simply pay it. It's the decent thing to do.

dave_s13

14,031 posts

300 months

Friday 11th September 2015
quotequote all
Baryonyx said:
Tell her to fk off.
This. You said you were going to pick it up and take it to the vet to be put down. She got the hump and did the same thing anyway!

zarjaz1991

6,918 posts

154 months

Friday 11th September 2015
quotequote all
Yes, because telling your neighbours to fk off will ensure a stress free, harmonious existence.

Itsallicanafford

2,963 posts

190 months

Friday 11th September 2015
quotequote all
zarjaz1991 said:
Yes, because telling your neighbours to fk off will ensure a stress free, harmonious existence.
Unless she has Tourette's, she might just think you are saying hello?

mikeveal

5,140 posts

281 months

Friday 11th September 2015
quotequote all
Since the cat is not dead until you have observed it to be dead (until then it is simultaneously dead and alive) I would go with simultaneously paying and not paying.

Maybe you could resolve this on the macroscopic level by going halvsies?


LordGrover

34,189 posts

243 months

Friday 11th September 2015
quotequote all
Baryonyx said:
Tell her to fk off.
Charming. I expect you're a lovely neighbour.

soad

34,751 posts

207 months

Friday 11th September 2015
quotequote all
Itsallicanafford said:
Next time you see your neighbour wear a very large bandage around your head, explain you have 'had a fall', make sure to look abit vacant. When challenged about said cat, deny all knowledge of ever owning a cat....
hehe

zarjaz1991 said:
Unless you're completely skint, simply pay it. It's the decent thing to do.
yes