'Normal' names are dying out.
'Normal' names are dying out.
Author
Discussion

hornetrider

Original Poster:

63,161 posts

236 months

Wednesday 21st October 2015
quotequote all
Found this article really interesting. There's some rather common mainstream names which are basically totally dying out for this generation.

Numbers in brackets are the total number of babies with those names in 2014.

Gary (33), Colin (48), Ian (80), Lee (97), Craig (50), Stewart (6!), Nigel (10).

The current Top 10 is:

1. Oliver
2. Jack
3. Harry
4. Jacob
5. Charlie
6. Thomas
7. George
8. Oscar
9. James
10. William

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/men/the-filter/11942315...

rpguk

4,520 posts

315 months

Wednesday 21st October 2015
quotequote all
Ebbs and flows really. There are no names in that top 10 which are new or revolutionary. They are all pretty normal.

And if those names like Gary and Lee do die out they'll stop being normal and will become like Cedric or Engelbert

Some Gump

13,018 posts

217 months

Wednesday 21st October 2015
quotequote all
Names come and go in fashion shocker.

wiggy001

7,404 posts

302 months

Wednesday 21st October 2015
quotequote all
hornetrider said:
The current Top 10 is:

1. Oliver
2. Jack
3. Harry
4. Jacob
5. Charlie
6. Thomas
7. George
8. Oscar
9. James
10. William
Only if you split out the 3 different spellings of Mohammed... lights touchpaper...

hornetrider

Original Poster:

63,161 posts

236 months

Wednesday 21st October 2015
quotequote all
wiggy001 said:
Only if you split out the 3 different spellings of Mohammed... lights touchpaper...
Funny you should mention that. In finding the Top 10 I looked at 3 websites, two (Independent, BBC) had the list above and one (babycentre.co.uk) had Mo as #1. I went with the Beeb to avoid the controversy wink

whatleytom

1,536 posts

214 months

Wednesday 21st October 2015
quotequote all
Thing is, the list of popular names, besides a couple of them are hardly out there are they!?


PH5121

2,007 posts

244 months

Wednesday 21st October 2015
quotequote all
Both of my sons names are on that list and they are 6 and 8, so it is hardly a passing phase.

Who knows, when they grow up they may be calling their kids Kevin and Gary in a hark back to old fashioned names.

C0ffin D0dger

3,440 posts

176 months

Wednesday 21st October 2015
quotequote all
LordGrover said:
Heh. We have six Garys (including two Gareths) in our sales office of 33. It was fairly popular 20-30 years ago.
Gary Glitter didn't exactly do much for the popularity of the name did he furious

Gretchen

19,809 posts

247 months

Wednesday 21st October 2015
quotequote all
What you're classing as 'normal' appear to be named without historical value. The names on the list above all are. My eldest is almost 22 and he's a Jack Oliver Ernest - younger two have biblical names, albeit not 'normal' or common.

My name is probably classed as 'normal' yet there's no history to it and has only been used since the '60s/'70s really.



ManFromDelmonte

2,744 posts

211 months

Wednesday 21st October 2015
quotequote all
Not many Adolfs that I can find, the way some of PH reads these days I'd have thought it would be making a comeback.

SilverSixer

8,202 posts

182 months

Wednesday 21st October 2015
quotequote all
PH5121 said:
Both of my sons names are on that list and they are 6 and 8, so it is hardly a passing phase.

Who knows, when they grow up they may be calling their kids Kevin and Gary in a hark back to old fashioned names.
This is exactly it. Most of that top ten (and the girls' ones) are names I associate with my grandparents' generation.

There will be a second coming of Steves in 50 years time, as children are again named after their grandparents' generation. My son is named after one of my Grandads.

TEKNOPUG

20,499 posts

236 months

Wednesday 21st October 2015
quotequote all
3 on the list are diminutives of proper names and 7 have been King/Protector of this country - how more normal do you want? I'd suggest that the Gary/Ian/Nigel were the Baby Boomer reaction to their parents and the names have just gone full circle.

Edited by TEKNOPUG on Wednesday 21st October 10:51

Jimmy Recard

17,551 posts

210 months

Wednesday 21st October 2015
quotequote all
There's not much wrong with those names. I don't like the name Oscar but that's not so bad.

My name looks rare now, but it hasn't really been popular since the 1960s. If I have kids they'll be Wayne or Brian to get ahead of the trend before those names become popular again

mr_spock

3,376 posts

246 months

Wednesday 21st October 2015
quotequote all
[quote=TEKNOPUG]3 on the list are diminutives of proper names and 7 have been King/Protector of this country - how more normal do you want? I'd suggest that the Gary/Ian/Nigel were the Baby Boomer reaction to their parents and the names have just gone full circle.

I'm an Ian - there were 3 of us in my class at primary school, all with the same spelling (no Iain). My parents chose it because my Grandfather's Hebrew name was Isaac, and Ian is a sort of Anglicised version. Gareth is an old name, first written in that form in 1485 as a character (Sir Gareth) in the legend of King Arthur, and it's apparently of Welsh origin (Geraint). I'm not sure it's that modern! Nigel also has ancient Latin and Norse origins. I never knew until I looked it up just now! Fascinating, love this stuff.

I'm not sure anyone will be looking for the origins of Chardonnay and La-tish-oo or whatever.

rohrl

8,984 posts

176 months

Wednesday 21st October 2015
quotequote all
Names like Gary, Lee and Darren are all a bit "council" aren't they?

The names listed as the top ten are all pretty timeless British names as far as I can see.

chonok

1,183 posts

266 months

Wednesday 21st October 2015
quotequote all
We found this when choosing names for our little ones.

Names seem to skip a generation, then come back into fashion. Nothing revolutionary really.

SilverSixer

8,202 posts

182 months

Wednesday 21st October 2015
quotequote all
mr_spock]EKNOPUG said:
3 on the list are diminutives of proper names and 7 have been King/Protector of this country - how more normal do you want? I'd suggest that the Gary/Ian/Nigel were the Baby Boomer reaction to their parents and the names have just gone full circle.

I'm an Ian - there were 3 of us in my class at primary school, all with the same spelling (no Iain). My parents chose it because my Grandfather's Hebrew name was Isaac, and Ian is a sort of Anglicised version.
Eh? Ian is the Anglicisation of the Jockification of John (which is what Iain is) - see other Celtic variants of John, e.g. Sean, Euan, Ieuan, Ifan etc. Originally Yohanan in Hebrew. Nothing to do with Isaac. I think your parents slipped up there.

GreatGranny

9,519 posts

257 months

Wednesday 21st October 2015
quotequote all
I read that Wayne has died out altogether.

My 9 year old is called Charlie (Charles on his BC), middle name Arthur after my F in L.

I wanted Wilf (Wilfred) after my Grandad but that was rejected at Board level (wife).

Not surprisingly none of my dads names were on the short list (Brian Vincent).

Galsia

2,266 posts

221 months

Wednesday 21st October 2015
quotequote all
In 20 years time every adult male will either be called Jack or Alfie.

Golaboots

369 posts

179 months

Wednesday 21st October 2015
quotequote all
This site does a pretty good job at explaining what is going on:
http://waitbutwhy.com/2013/12/how-to-name-baby.htm...