When is it acceptable to grass?
When is it acceptable to grass?
Author
Discussion

Pints

Original Poster:

18,451 posts

225 months

Wednesday 16th December 2015
quotequote all
These comments from another dash cam thread started me thinking. (Posts edited for relevance.)

Zombie said:
sealtt said:
I just hate the idea of people collecting evidence against other people. It's just not a nice way for society to be in my opinion.
+1...

But if you behave where's the problem?
When the law is broken and we've been in a position to gather evidence against the perpetrator, when is it acceptable to dob them in?
Evidence of a murder; evasion of taxes; burglary; benefit cheats; jumping a red light; 45 in a 40 zone; littering?

What law would need to be broken for you to turn the evidence over to the police?


Mods: This is more pub banter than what the law says, so not really SP&TL.

Yes, I'm told late summer to mid-autumn is the best time to plant grass seeds.

rufusgti

2,573 posts

223 months

Wednesday 16th December 2015
quotequote all
Littering.

Littering disgusts me. Speeding isn't much of a concern unless it's past my house. Obviously any morally alighned human would grass up a murderer.

davek_964

11,350 posts

206 months

Wednesday 16th December 2015
quotequote all
I discovered last week that the weirdo at the end of my road (next door neighbour but one) is actually a Class A drug dealer. If it wasn't for the fact that it's likely to have a negative effect on my cars / property (or I guess me!) - I'd be sitting outside his house taking polaroid snaps of anybody visiting him.

As it is, it has made me realise I really do need to get around to installing CCTV which is something I've been meaning to do for ages - and I fully intend to have one HD camera pointing at the entrance to his house, and if he is continuing to receive short visits from many people at irregular intervals I will be handing over copies of the video to the police as much as possible.

grumbledoak

32,571 posts

264 months

Wednesday 16th December 2015
quotequote all
Around the point where you would consider beating them to death for the crime.

Type R Tom

4,338 posts

180 months

Wednesday 16th December 2015
quotequote all
I tend to find (particularly on this site) that any highway laws seem to go out the window. I find it strange that bad/dangerous driving picked up on a dash cam shouldn't be handed to the police but a mugging caught on CCTV should be.

Some people say if the dangerous driving didn't result in an accident why bother to report but I'd use the mugging analogy again that someone might not get any money but you'd still want the little st caught so they arrogantly don't try it again.

Rawwr

22,722 posts

265 months

Wednesday 16th December 2015
quotequote all
grumbledoak said:
Around the point where you would consider beating them to death for the crime.
So, littering?

bobbo89

6,028 posts

176 months

Wednesday 16th December 2015
quotequote all
Type R Tom said:
I tend to find (particularly on this site) that any highway laws seem to go out the window. I find it strange that bad/dangerous driving picked up on a dash cam shouldn't be handed to the police but a mugging caught on CCTV should be.

Some people say if the dangerous driving didn't result in an accident why bother to report but I'd use the mugging analogy again that someone might not get any money but you'd still want the little st caught so they arrogantly don't try it again.
The problem is that you get the anal adenoidal tossers who upon recording someone break highway law in the very slightest of ways, will be merrily trotting off to the local police station to hand in their evidence demanding that the person be prosecuted!

RacingPete

9,208 posts

235 months

Wednesday 16th December 2015
quotequote all
It really depends where someone's moral compass is at.

Motoring offences can be down to someone making a one off mistake or mis judgement, or just being an impatient tt (using hard shoulder, going through Red Cross on motorway, just jumping a red light as it turns), to full on consistent dangerous driving. Unless it is consistent I'm not sure it is worth it.

I suppose for me it is down to the potential seriousness of the crime. For example, yesterday, one of the mum's walking back from school was asked as she passed a public toilet to go in and check there were no ladies in the toilet as a guy wanted to fill his water bottle - with a men's toilet next door, and shops a further 5 mins away it all seemed dodgy. She reported it to the police, and rightfully so.

Type R Tom

4,338 posts

180 months

Wednesday 16th December 2015
quotequote all
RacingPete said:
It really depends where someone's moral compass is at.

Motoring offences can be down to someone making a one off mistake or mis judgement, or just being an impatient tt (using hard shoulder, going through Red Cross on motorway, just jumping a red light as it turns), to full on consistent dangerous driving. Unless it is consistent I'm not sure it is worth it.
For me some of those things are the epitome of the "me me me" culture we now live in and deserve to be punished. Everyone makes mistakes and I'm not saying every little mistake should be punished but odds on someone who undertakes traffic on the hard shoulder, as an example, has probably done it before and will probably keep doing it until they are caught.

Also I believe red cross will become endorsable soon, it's linked to the managed motorways/hard shoulder running stuff that to work will require drivers to abide by the signs.

Moominho

902 posts

171 months

Wednesday 16th December 2015
quotequote all
I'm pretty sure one of my neighbours is a drug dealer. His clients seem nice enough, he's a very good neighbour and gets on with my family well. I would feel very uncomfortable telling the police about him...

Pints

Original Poster:

18,451 posts

225 months

Wednesday 16th December 2015
quotequote all
I'm spotting NIMBY and (perhaps oddly) reverse-NIMBY attitudes. Hardly surprising.
(I don't use the term negatively. It's just an observation.)

2 sMoKiN bArReLs

32,039 posts

266 months

Wednesday 16th December 2015
quotequote all
rufusgti said:
Littering.

Littering disgusts me. Speeding isn't much of a concern unless it's past my house. Obviously any morally alighned human would grass up a murderer.
This! ....and the feckwits who disgustingly don't consider discarded cigarette ends as litter.

davek_964

11,350 posts

206 months

Wednesday 16th December 2015
quotequote all
Pints said:
I'm spotting NIMBY and (perhaps oddly) reverse-NIMBY attitudes. Hardly surprising.
(I don't use the term negatively. It's just an observation.)
If I saw strong evidence of drug dealing somewhere else, then I'd happily inform the police. However, there is definitely an essence of NIMBY for me - I do not want the kind of people who are buying class A drugs regularly visiting close to my house. I have noticeable cars parked on my driveway, and I do not want them to attract attention to my property from those kind of people. Not to mention the fact that it's unlikely to help property prices!

Type R Tom

4,338 posts

180 months

Wednesday 16th December 2015
quotequote all
Pints said:
I'm spotting NIMBY and (perhaps oddly) reverse-NIMBY attitudes. Hardly surprising.
(I don't use the term negatively. It's just an observation.)
NIMBYS are the reason so many people are affected and hate many highway schemes. From speed cameras to traffic calming, they will generally start with someone somewhere complaining about traffic outside their house and will demand “something is done about it”!

zarjaz1991

6,912 posts

154 months

Wednesday 16th December 2015
quotequote all
"Telling tales" is what it is, and it's unacceptable, and promoted by people who are utter nobodies, they have nothing in their lives and are envious of people who do so they want to do whatever they can to take it away from them.

Unfortunately the line between telling tales and reporting something worthwhile is difficult to draw.

Myself....I don't trust the police or the local authorities so I would never pass on any information about anyone. The last time I reported something to police (a vandal smashed my rear light), the police prosecuted me (for having a defective rear light). So they can go to Merry Hell.

ikarl

4,071 posts

230 months

Wednesday 16th December 2015
quotequote all
davek_964 said:
I discovered last week that the weirdo at the end of my road (next door neighbour but one) is actually a Class A drug dealer. If it wasn't for the fact that it's likely to have a negative effect on my cars / property (or I guess me!) - I'd be sitting outside his house taking polaroid snaps of anybody visiting him.

As it is, it has made me realise I really do need to get around to installing CCTV which is something I've been meaning to do for ages - and I fully intend to have one HD camera pointing at the entrance to his house, and if he is continuing to receive short visits from many people at irregular intervals I will be handing over copies of the video to the police as much as possible.
I used to live in reasonably close proximity to a drug dealer. Strangely we never had any bother around our 'area' but the area we lived in wasn't exactly known as the nicest part of town.

We always put it down to the drug dealer making sure that his clients knew not to cause trouble around his house as it would cause trouble for him.

227bhp

10,203 posts

159 months

Wednesday 16th December 2015
quotequote all
I generally make the rule that if it affects me or the World I live in in a bad way then yes act to stop it, if it doesn't then live n let live.

andy-xr

13,204 posts

235 months

Wednesday 16th December 2015
quotequote all
I have a dash cam. It's only purpose is to protect me from what would otherwise be a 50/50 claim if someone drove in to me.

I wouldn't bother looking at or uploading the footage of what other people are up to if it doesn't affect me. I'm half interested in the dash cam videos of people doing daft stuff, more to watch people doing daft stuff than anything.

The guy who deliberately drove into his own accident on the dash cam thread is a good example of someone taking it too far. Dash cams are responsible for unleashing a 'it's my right of way' style of driving because people think they have 'the evidence' to back up their assertions. They're usually wrong, and half the stuff they upload is them drama hunting for something. Like accelerating towards someone on a roundabout, it's kind of like they want to get close to or actually crash.

Anyway - I probably wouldn't grass up anyone from dash cam footage, but I would use it to witness and help explain a situation to insurers if one unfolded infront of me

Vaud

59,922 posts

186 months

Wednesday 16th December 2015
quotequote all
All very subjective, personal moral compass.

Someone flies by me doing 100 on the motorway? Nope
Someone flies my me doing 90 outside a school and weaving, drunk, etc? Yup.

etc

Hackney

7,440 posts

239 months

Wednesday 16th December 2015
quotequote all
andy-xr said:
I have a dash cam. It's only purpose is to protect me from what would otherwise be a 50/50 claim if someone drove in to me.

I wouldn't bother looking at or uploading the footage of what other people are up to if it doesn't affect me. I'm half interested in the dash cam videos of people doing daft stuff, more to watch people doing daft stuff than anything.
This. Irritates me that some people think all dashcam owners are busybody, adenoidal, pricks who want to "grass" others up for nothing.
I've had a dashcam for a year and haven't taken the memory cards out or uploaded any footage to my computer never mind Youtube. It's there for if the worst happens and nothing else.