Thoughts ... having first child at 40
Thoughts ... having first child at 40
Author
Discussion

BigJonMcQuimm

Original Poster:

975 posts

243 months

Sunday 17th January 2016
quotequote all
Hi

Happily married for 10 years, together 18.

We both work in finance, so long hours, tube commute - usual sort of stuff.

I will be 40 this year, the wife 39.

We feel now is the last moment we could have kids. However, we are now concerned we may have left it too late.

Any experience of having kids later? Ideally we would have more than one if we can.

Thanks for your thoughts.

grumbledoak

32,571 posts

264 months

Sunday 17th January 2016
quotequote all
It's too late to do it in your twenties, that's for sure!

Go for it. Youth is no help for the baby years anyway - no sleep is no sleep. And if you have to get a bit fitter later to keep up with them as kids it will be an added bonus.

I am older than you and having more kids is the only reason I would bother with another marriage/relationship.

oddball1973

1,528 posts

154 months

Sunday 17th January 2016
quotequote all
Had two, first when i was 39 and second at 41 (i'm a couple of weeks off 43 & my wife is a year older than me). I see not issues, we are both healthy, finances are far better than when we were in our 20's so less of a strain in that area (they do cost a bit needing new clothes what seems like every other week etc.) but absolutely no regrets - my advice is give it a go which is also quite good fun, i guarantee fatherhood is brilliant

DocJock

8,722 posts

271 months

Sunday 17th January 2016
quotequote all
OP you will get slaughtered in the Dad's Race at school sports day... wink

Amused2death

2,526 posts

227 months

Sunday 17th January 2016
quotequote all
I didn't become a dad until I was 41. I don't think I'd have been such a caring dad if this had happened when I was 21 or even 31. You've had plenty of life experience to bring into the equation and can draw on that to raise your child(ren) to be responsible adults.

Only "negative" if it can be considered as such is your own ages once they become adults. You'll be in your 60's.

Abbott

2,864 posts

234 months

Sunday 17th January 2016
quotequote all
My best mate was a late starter on the children front. You need to be prepared to be in your mid 50s when the children are going through their awkward and sometimes difficult teenage years. My mate really struggles with that.
They have never had much money so it has been a bit of a struggle as the kids get more expensive at a time when ours are now all out of Uni and off the payroll.
Having said all that, you can never rationalise all aspects of having children and I would say go for it. The pleasure they give, by far, out weighs the tough times.

ClaphamGT3

12,249 posts

274 months

Sunday 17th January 2016
quotequote all
My wife and I had our 1st at 37 and second at 39. Best thing we've ever done. Go for it.

jimbobs

434 posts

287 months

Sunday 17th January 2016
quotequote all
I was 45, wife 39 when first (& only!) child was born. He's now 2.

There have been many times over the last couple of years when I've said 'I'm too old for this!'. The lack of sleep in the first year was really, really hard.

Plus it's really odd having friends of the same age discussing their kids' university choices and what they'll do when the kids move out when ours isn't even at school yet.

But it's great, really it is. The expression on his face this morning when we opened the curtains and he saw snow for the first time was priceless!

The first 6 months are basically st. Then it gets a bit better every day. When they start to talk, that's when it really gets fun.

Quhet

2,955 posts

177 months

Sunday 17th January 2016
quotequote all
My dad was 43 when I was born. It used to bother me slightly when I was younger but it hasn't really affected anything and it's not stopped him from being a great dad. He's going to be 70 this year and is still fit and healthy.

I sometimes worry about what he'll be like in 10 years or so and I'm in my 30s but there is a lot of life to be had between then and now!

Huntsman

9,448 posts

281 months

Sunday 17th January 2016
quotequote all
I'm 44. Mrs Huntsman is 38. Just had our first.

Get on with it man!

CC07 PEU

2,519 posts

235 months

Sunday 17th January 2016
quotequote all
I'm surprised that so many people think having children in their late thirties/early forties is "too late" expecially when people are living longer these days. If you keep particularly fit and healthy then I don't imagine it'd be that much more difficult than someone in their early thirties for example. I'm not a dad though so I'm not speaking from experience.

m3jappa

6,950 posts

249 months

Sunday 17th January 2016
quotequote all
Quhet said:
My dad was 43 when I was born. It used to bother me slightly when I was younger but it hasn't really affected anything and it's not stopped him from being a great dad. He's going to be 70 this year and is still fit and healthy.

I sometimes worry about what he'll be like in 10 years or so and I'm in my 30s but there is a lot of life to be had between then and now!
My dad was 40 and is now 76! And doing extremely well, significantly fitter and healthier than many younger people, I can only hope I am the same at his age. It does worry me how long he's got left but tbh he's in such a good way I just can not see that day coming for quite some time!

I've just had my first at 35. Right now while the mrs is off work and does the night stuff it's pretty easy, I imagine that might get harder when the wife goes back to work.
But either way we are both extremely happy smile

In a way I regret not having children sooner, but then I wasn't as financially stable and to me that's very important.

Jasandjules

72,680 posts

260 months

Sunday 17th January 2016
quotequote all
It's not too late.

Good luck.

crofty1984

17,064 posts

235 months

Sunday 17th January 2016
quotequote all
Can't you adopt a 14 year old. By the time you're 45 they'll be at uni and relatively out of your hair.

Morningside

24,147 posts

260 months

Sunday 17th January 2016
quotequote all
My dad was 52 when he had me.

Chrisgr31

14,294 posts

286 months

Sunday 17th January 2016
quotequote all
Another old dad, we were both 39 when we had our first and only. Plenty of older parents around. Get on with it.

CoolHands

23,672 posts

226 months

Sunday 17th January 2016
quotequote all
Go for it. But the chances of actually managing to are low at that age.

Luke.

12,044 posts

281 months

Sunday 17th January 2016
quotequote all
CoolHands said:
Go for it. But the chances of actually managing to are low at that age.
No they're not.

DrDeAtH

3,704 posts

263 months

Sunday 17th January 2016
quotequote all
First child here at 38. Crack on with it. Friend of mine had his last one when he was 50

Quhet

2,955 posts

177 months

Sunday 17th January 2016
quotequote all
CoolHands said:
Go for it. But the chances of actually managing to are low at that age.
Tell that to Des O'Connor et al.