Discussion
http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-bristol-3570021...
Interesting but, isn't this sexual discrimination? Surely they would be better off just allowing everybody the same level of flexibility?
Interesting but, isn't this sexual discrimination? Surely they would be better off just allowing everybody the same level of flexibility?
I dont see discrimination either way to be honest, if you're too ill to be working and you can make the time up at a later date, that's just a good sickness policy to me regardless of whether you're having period pains. Good PR for the company's recruitment plans and might take a good aim at those companies who dont even provide sick pay, those people I have a real problem with
GroundEffect said:
I knew PH would be touting discrimination.
They have to pull up bleeding for a week every month with pretty mad cramps. I'll happily swap that for more consistent work hours.
Their point was that the time 'would be made up elsewhere'...so in effect, it might make their lives harder!
So IF (and it's not entirely clear from the article) their policy is to allow women to take time off as they wish and then work that back at their convenience but not men who suffer from some recurring health condition, you wouldn't consider that discrimination?They have to pull up bleeding for a week every month with pretty mad cramps. I'll happily swap that for more consistent work hours.
Their point was that the time 'would be made up elsewhere'...so in effect, it might make their lives harder!
The reasoning behind it is totally irrelevant, if they want to be flexible why not be flexible with any member of staff who takes time off 'sick' (one might argue that women on their period are not sick but, their alternative without this policy is to take sick leave).
I'm pro equality, that mean's equality for everyone, not just those considered to have been marginalised or wronged in the past based on their gender, sexuality, race, nationality or anything else.
skahigh said:
So IF (and it's not entirely clear from the article) their policy is to allow women to take time off as they wish and then work that back at their convenience but not men who suffer from some recurring health condition, you wouldn't consider that discrimination?.
How do you know they dont allow men to have the same entitlement but under a different policy name? andy-xr said:
skahigh said:
So IF (and it's not entirely clear from the article) their policy is to allow women to take time off as they wish and then work that back at their convenience but not men who suffer from some recurring health condition, you wouldn't consider that discrimination?.
How do you know they dont allow men to have the same entitlement but under a different policy name? 
skahigh said:
andy-xr said:
skahigh said:
So IF (and it's not entirely clear from the article) their policy is to allow women to take time off as they wish and then work that back at their convenience but not men who suffer from some recurring health condition, you wouldn't consider that discrimination?.
How do you know they dont allow men to have the same entitlement but under a different policy name? 
And in any event, neither of us work for this company
Gassing Station | The Lounge | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff






