'Whites cars' or 'White's cars'
'Whites cars' or 'White's cars'
Author
Discussion

supercommuter

Original Poster:

2,169 posts

132 months

Wednesday 14th February 2018
quotequote all
Which one of these is the correct grammaticaly?! For a business name

Pericoloso

44,044 posts

193 months

Wednesday 14th February 2018
quotequote all


White's cars.

Waits to be corrected.

Strudul

1,599 posts

115 months

Wednesday 14th February 2018
quotequote all
Depends on the name.

If the name is "White", then "White's", as they belong to "White"
If the name is "Whites", then "Whites' ", as they belong to "Whites"

supercommuter

Original Poster:

2,169 posts

132 months

Wednesday 14th February 2018
quotequote all
His name is James White..

I thought it was 'Whites Cars'

Would it make a difference if it wasn't an object and was in fact services, so 'Whites Car repairs'

RichB

56,369 posts

314 months

Wednesday 14th February 2018
quotequote all
As it's a business name you can call it what you want. For example Sainsbury's is grammatically correct because the shops belonged to John Sainsbury yet by contrast Woolworths shops (no apostrophe) belonged to FW Woolworth. Perhaps that was because he was American hehe

gothatway

7,756 posts

200 months

Wednesday 14th February 2018
quotequote all
supercommuter said:
Which one of these is the correct grammaticaly?! For a business name
Not a good start .. it should read "which (one) of these is grammatically correct ?" Note spelling of grammatically.
Either could be correct, but the first would be less usual, implying a Mr Whites owned or built the cars, whereas the second would relate to a Mr White, which is a much more common name than Whites.

Strudul

1,599 posts

115 months

Wednesday 14th February 2018
quotequote all
Doesn't matter what it is, it belongs to him, so White's.

anonymous-user

84 months

Wednesday 14th February 2018
quotequote all
White's.

SCEtoAUX

4,119 posts

111 months

Wednesday 14th February 2018
quotequote all
Assuming he doesn't sell vans or motorbikes he might like to call it "Whites only cars".

Oh hang on...

SCEtoAUX

4,119 posts

111 months

Wednesday 14th February 2018
quotequote all
What about "Jimmy Whites - Cars on Cue"?

So

28,176 posts

252 months

Wednesday 14th February 2018
quotequote all
Strudul said:
Doesn't matter what it is, it belongs to him, so White's.
Ah, but if it's a garage that doesn't sell cars to blacks it would be "Whites' Cars".

anonymous-user

84 months

Wednesday 14th February 2018
quotequote all
Chalkie's Motors.

Thank me later.

davhill

5,263 posts

214 months

Thursday 15th February 2018
quotequote all
Many apostrophe glitches can be based on the broadsheet newspapers. For example, The New York Times
habitually used all capitals for headlines., as follows This caused some confusion, as follows...

CDS:THE FUTURE

Readers had to ask, "What is CDS, where can I find it?" So, the apostrophe became the mark to denote a plural, as in...

CD'S: THE FUTURE

My vey old (wartime) signwriting guide says that apostrophes aren't used with all capitals, so this is correct...

WHITES CARS

In upper and lower case, this is correct BUT WHITE'S CARS is wrong.

White's Cars

Thisis also correct. It means, ' The cars (plural) of White.'

You can have your cake and eat it, Or you could play Bremainer and call it

LES BOLIDES DE MONSIEUR BLANC

INCORPORTING Schwarzen Taxis GmbH




Riley Blue

23,205 posts

256 months

Thursday 15th February 2018
quotequote all

supercommuter

Original Poster:

2,169 posts

132 months

Thursday 15th February 2018
quotequote all
Comprehensive responses as ever..

Thank you for replying to this boring but helpful thread