"Flat" batteries
Author
Discussion

mr_spock

Original Poster:

3,374 posts

245 months

Friday 1st November 2019
quotequote all
OK, no idea where to turn on this one, Google has let me down. I have a 1930's Phililte bycycle lamp which runs from a dynamo or an internal battery. The battery type is a "flat" battery (try Googling "flat battery"...) and it's NOT an Ever Ready 800 type, it's shorter and flatter but the terminals are a similar config.

Here's the lamp - original ad:



So - over to PH - what flat batteries, probably 3V or 6V, were available in the 1930s to at leat the 1950s which are smaller than an 800?

Help!

CrunkleFloop

781 posts

275 months

Friday 1st November 2019
quotequote all
Anything like this?



|https://thumbsnap.com/rvGNtQTu[/url]

Can you post a picture of the battery so we know what we're looking for. Presumably there are no markings on it.[url]


Edited by CrunkleFloop on Friday 1st November 14:41

AlexB

317 posts

266 months

Friday 1st November 2019
quotequote all
How big are we talking? The PP1 looks to be 6V, but looks a bit big...



Edited by AlexB on Friday 1st November 14:51

Tyre Smoke

23,018 posts

291 months

Friday 1st November 2019
quotequote all
Never mind the battery for a moment, 43/6d in the 1930s?? yikes

Two things, that's over £130.00 today and surely it would have been written £2/3/6?


motco

17,622 posts

276 months

Friday 1st November 2019
quotequote all
It will almost certainly be the 'flat' 3 cell 4.5v torch battery shown above. These were very common indeed in the 50s and 60s and date back to the Edwardian period.

LordGrover

34,166 posts

242 months

Friday 1st November 2019
quotequote all
Amazon - helpfully gives dimensions of the packaging. irked

mr_spock

Original Poster:

3,374 posts

245 months

Friday 1st November 2019
quotequote all
I think the issue is the terminal config. It looks like there needs to be top and bottom or top and side. Will try for a pic of the innards. I don’t have a battery at all. The top terminal is offset. Maybe it’s the one you suggested but with the terminal bent to the side?

shtu

4,522 posts

176 months

Friday 1st November 2019
quotequote all
motco said:
It will almost certainly be the 'flat' 3 cell 4.5v torch battery shown above. These were very common indeed in the 50s and 60s and date back to the Edwardian period.
Used to be very common, thanks to Petzl Zoom head torches.

try,

e13,
mn1203,
3lr12, 3lr6

There also used to be adapters to convert from the "flat" battery to 3x AAs, Petzl themselves did one.

motco

17,622 posts

276 months

Friday 1st November 2019
quotequote all
mr_spock said:
I think the issue is the terminal config. It looks like there needs to be top and bottom or top and side. Will try for a pic of the innards. I don’t have a battery at all. The top terminal is offset. Maybe it’s the one you suggested but with the terminal bent to the side?
It was common practice in some applications to bend one tag over and down the side.

Dogwatch

6,381 posts

252 months

Friday 1st November 2019
quotequote all
Wasn't unknown for some applications to require one or both terminals to be bent over backwards. I can't help wondering about battery life connected to a dynamo though, as they're not rechargeable batteries!

By the Fifties I think the penny had dropped and the battery dispensed with. Vehicle and street lighting though still poor, hence the introduction of reflective plates, was much better than pre-war.

mr_spock

Original Poster:

3,374 posts

245 months

Friday 1st November 2019
quotequote all
Thanks, bending the terminals was the missing info! I’ve ordered one from Amazon as a cheap add on item to see. The lamp has two bulbs, one on battery and one for the battery. I put a 6v one in each but can easily swap one for a 4.5v

littleredrooster

6,380 posts

226 months

Friday 1st November 2019
quotequote all
I had a very similar dynamo set on my bike in the 50s - may have been branded 'Miller' - which had a battery standby.

I think there may be a terminal missing (or obscured?) in the picture. I can see one attached to the switch, there should be another just along from it. The battery is definitely the 4.5v flat type, and goes in with the terminals pointing to the left in your picture. The spring clamp and base hold it in place.

Don't be misled by the big terminals in the foreground - they're the connections for the bulb/reflector, the battery connectors are across to the left of the picture.

The battery is never in circuit with the dynamo, the switch on the top selects between battery power or dynamo power, never the two together.

All of this is to the best of my (fragile) memory... :/

Gary C

15,257 posts

209 months

Friday 1st November 2019
quotequote all
mr_spock said:
OK, no idea where to turn on this one, Google has let me down. I have a 1930's Phililte bycycle lamp which runs from a dynamo or an internal battery. The battery type is a "flat" battery (try Googling "flat battery"...) and it's NOT an Ever Ready 800 type, it's shorter and flatter but the terminals are a similar config.

Here's the lamp - original ad:



So - over to PH - what flat batteries, probably 3V or 6V, were available in the 1930s to at leat the 1950s which are smaller than an 800?

Help!
Christ, I had one of those !

Jonny TVR

4,551 posts

311 months

Friday 1st November 2019
quotequote all
Tyre Smoke said:
Never mind the battery for a moment, 43/6d in the 1930s?? yikes

Two things, that's over £130.00 today and surely it would have been written £2/3/6?
It was probably still made in the UK instead of China. I remember having a Pifco one identical to that in the Seventies and I bet that didn't cost my parents £130.

john2443

6,541 posts

241 months

Friday 1st November 2019
quotequote all
Tyre Smoke said:
surely it would have been written £2/3/6?
Not necessarily, I can remember things that were over a quid being written like that, I wonder if it was because it sounds cheaper in shillings than in pounds.

Johnspex

5,253 posts

214 months

Friday 1st November 2019
quotequote all
john2443 said:
Tyre Smoke said:
surely it would have been written £2/3/6?
Not necessarily, I can remember things that were over a quid being written like that, I wonder if it was because it sounds cheaper in shillings than in pounds.
Absolutely. Much the same as £99 and not £100 and the way TV adverts say one nine nine and not one hundred and ninety nine pounds.

gazza285

11,167 posts

238 months

Friday 1st November 2019
quotequote all
Tyre Smoke said:
That's over £130.00 today...
That is less than a good dynamo set would cost today.

Tyre Smoke

23,018 posts

291 months

Friday 1st November 2019
quotequote all
gazza285 said:
Tyre Smoke said:
That's over £130.00 today...
That is less than a good dynamo set would cost today.
Really? Bloody hell!

Shall we get a new cooker Flo? Or shall I save up for a new set of lights for the bike now the dark evenings are here?

mr_spock

Original Poster:

3,374 posts

245 months

Friday 1st November 2019
quotequote all
littleredrooster said:
I had a very similar dynamo set on my bike in the 50s - may have been branded 'Miller' - which had a battery standby.

I think there may be a terminal missing (or obscured?) in the picture. I can see one attached to the switch, there should be another just along from it. The battery is definitely the 4.5v flat type, and goes in with the terminals pointing to the left in your picture. The spring clamp and base hold it in place.

Don't be misled by the big terminals in the foreground - they're the connections for the bulb/reflector, the battery connectors are across to the left of the picture.

The battery is never in circuit with the dynamo, the switch on the top selects between battery power or dynamo power, never the two together.

All of this is to the best of my (fragile) memory... :/
Sounds spot on! There is no second terminal and I can’t see there ever was. The bottom copper connector pushes against the back of the reflector and that’s the negative connection to the bulb holder thread. It’s also electrically connected to the battery holder so I’m assuming that I bend the terminal to the side to trap it in the holder?

mr_spock

Original Poster:

3,374 posts

245 months

Tuesday 5th November 2019
quotequote all
For anyone finding this through an internet search, it was indeed the 4.5V battery suggested above. I folded the -ve terminal to the side, and it works beautifully! Pics when I have a mo.