Tooting common anti aircraft guns
Tooting common anti aircraft guns
Author
Discussion

PositronicRay

Original Poster:

28,980 posts

212 months

Friday 14th August 2020
quotequote all
Talking to an elderly relative, he was recalling WW2 anti aircraft guns on tooting common.

What's the point of that? Isn't shooting down aircraft over London a bit anti productive?

anonymous-user

83 months

Friday 14th August 2020
quotequote all
Dunno about that but I spent a large part of my childhood playing in the the anti aircraft bunkers in and around Beckton and the old gasworks.

eta "It has been claimed that on some occasions the barrage above London was so intense that as many civilians were killed and injured by shrapnel and unexploded shells as by enemy action. A survey was carried out after one raid and it was discovered that six people were killed by shell splinters; four wounded by a shell in Enfield; a sailor severely injured by a shell splinter in Gipsy Hill; two civilians killed by another shell elsewhere; one man killed and two injured by a shell which hit a wall in Battersea; and two more killed in Tooting."

James Hayward, Myths & Legends of the Second World War (2003) page 99

Edited by anonymous-user on Friday 14th August 20:25

steviegunn

1,424 posts

213 months

Friday 14th August 2020
quotequote all
PositronicRay said:
Talking to an elderly relative, he was recalling WW2 anti aircraft guns on tooting common.

What's the point of that? Isn't shooting down aircraft over London a bit anti productive?
At least it won't come back and bomb you again tomorrow.

Spare tyre

12,558 posts

159 months

Friday 14th August 2020
quotequote all
I guess if you can shoot down a plane full of bombs, it might cause a lot of damage once, but then no more next week

Mr Dendrite

2,384 posts

239 months

Friday 14th August 2020
quotequote all
The purpose of high concentrations of anti aircraft fire was to drive the Bombers off course to prevent them having a level approach to their targets maximum disruption and lastly if they were lucky hit them and bring them down. Hence perceived high value targets had massive amounts of Ack ack around them. Otherwise you’d have stuck all the guns along the coast, but that was the role of interception fighters.

PositronicRay

Original Poster:

28,980 posts

212 months

Friday 14th August 2020
quotequote all
Mr Dendrite said:
The purpose of high concentrations of anti aircraft fire was to drive the Bombers off course to prevent them having a level approach to their targets maximum disruption and lastly if they were lucky hit them and bring them down. Hence perceived high value targets had massive amounts of Ack ack around them. Otherwise you’d have stuck all the guns along the coast, but that was the role of interception fighters.
Thx, makes sense, elderly relative was talking about rocket launchers too.

ApOrbital

10,587 posts

147 months

Friday 14th August 2020
quotequote all
Chocks away smile

Dogwatch

6,381 posts

251 months

Friday 14th August 2020
quotequote all
Mr Dendrite said:
Otherwise you’d have stuck all the guns along the coast, but that was the role of interception fighters.
Off topic for this thread but I believe they did move AA guns to the coast when the V1s started coming over.

Slightly more relevantly the Austin commercials used as ARP vans/auxiliary fire engines had reinforced roofs to protect the crews from shrapnel and some vital signal boxes did too. Clapham Junction 'A' was on a gantry that spanned all the tracks and was fine until they stuck an armoured roof over the top of it without any extra support for the additional weight. One busy day in the '60s the gantry decided it had had enough (the armour was still there).
Nothing moved between Clapham and Waterloo for several days IIRC while they propped it up.
The armour went soonish and the signalbox followed some years later.

anonymous-user

83 months

Friday 14th August 2020
quotequote all
My grandad was serving in the Kent Coastal battery when my nan, my mum and aunts were bombed out in the Eastend... nan wasn't please apparently.

bigandclever

14,359 posts

267 months

Friday 14th August 2020
quotequote all
PositronicRay said:
Mr Dendrite said:
The purpose of high concentrations of anti aircraft fire was to drive the Bombers off course to prevent them having a level approach to their targets maximum disruption and lastly if they were lucky hit them and bring them down. Hence perceived high value targets had massive amounts of Ack ack around them. Otherwise you’d have stuck all the guns along the coast, but that was the role of interception fighters.
Thx, makes sense, elderly relative was talking about rocket launchers too.
Tooting Bec common apparently had Z batteries.

Bit of blurb what they are ... http://www.hjbrownhistorian.co.uk/The%20Anti%20Air...

And from somewhere else “[Tooting Common] also had an important role during the Second World War when anti-aircraft guns were sited there along with barrage balloons, bomb shelters and 75 prefabricated houses to rehouse Blitz victims. It was also the site of a prisoner of war camp.“

FredericRobinson

5,037 posts

261 months

Saturday 15th August 2020
quotequote all
Anti aircraft guns also served a propaganda and morale purpose in showing the population that we were fighting back, so having them where they could be seen and heard was no bad thing

PositronicRay

Original Poster:

28,980 posts

212 months

Saturday 15th August 2020
quotequote all
bigandclever said:
PositronicRay said:
Mr Dendrite said:
The purpose of high concentrations of anti aircraft fire was to drive the Bombers off course to prevent them having a level approach to their targets maximum disruption and lastly if they were lucky hit them and bring them down. Hence perceived high value targets had massive amounts of Ack ack around them. Otherwise you’d have stuck all the guns along the coast, but that was the role of interception fighters.
Thx, makes sense, elderly relative was talking about rocket launchers too.
Tooting Bec common apparently had Z batteries.

Bit of blurb what they are ... http://www.hjbrownhistorian.co.uk/The%20Anti%20Air...

And from somewhere else “[Tooting Common] also had an important role during the Second World War when anti-aircraft guns were sited there along with barrage balloons, bomb shelters and 75 prefabricated houses to rehouse Blitz victims. It was also the site of a prisoner of war camp.“
Thanks for posting, sounds like what they were describing.

The Bethnal Green incident sounds horrific.

vixen1700

29,020 posts

299 months

Saturday 15th August 2020
quotequote all
We had anti-aircraft guns on the top of two tower blocks here in Leytonstone during the 2012 Olympics.

Apparently the residents weren't too happy about it. hehe

Eyersey1234

3,084 posts

108 months

Saturday 15th August 2020
quotequote all
I remember seeing a TV programme a while ago where someone that had been on an AA gun was interviewed and he said they were told (I'm paraphrasing this) it doesn't matter if you don't hit the planes just so long as the public can hear us shooting

bristolracer

5,949 posts

178 months

Saturday 15th August 2020
quotequote all
Even if they didn't directly hit the enemy aircraft they were very disruptive.
Shrapnel would penetrate the thin skins of the aircraft often killing and wounding crew members, and doing all sorts of other damage to the aircraft engines, airframe and systems.
The aircraft may get home but in a somewhat beat up state, with dead or seriously injured crew and a bomber that could be grounded for some time for repairs.
Many raids on Britain were night time so it was harder for the gunners to acquire targets, but as the Americans discovered to their huge cost over Europe, daylight raids made them fish in a barrel and easy pickings for axis gunners.

Painter38

122 posts

126 months

Monday 24th August 2020
quotequote all
As you cross Clapham Common on the South Circ you can see the bases for the gun emplacements on Westside.
Probably the same at Tooting.

Condi

20,348 posts

200 months

Tuesday 25th August 2020
quotequote all
Painter38 said:
As you cross Clapham Common on the South Circ you can see the bases for the gun emplacements on Westside.
Probably the same at Tooting.
Near both Clapham Common and Clapham South tube stations you can see big, circular structures, which were built to protect the stairwell shafts to the underground stations.

GliderRider

2,924 posts

110 months

Tuesday 25th August 2020
quotequote all
Anti Aircraft guns don't just shoot straight up. The ones on Hayling Island were for shooting at aircraft attacking Portsmouth.

DanielSan

20,008 posts

196 months

Tuesday 25th August 2020
quotequote all
bristolracer said:
Even if they didn't directly hit the enemy aircraft they were very disruptive.
Shrapnel would penetrate the thin skins of the aircraft often killing and wounding crew members, and doing all sorts of other damage to the aircraft engines, airframe and systems.
The aircraft may get home but in a somewhat beat up state, with dead or seriously injured crew and a bomber that could be grounded for some time for repairs.
Many raids on Britain were night time so it was harder for the gunners to acquire targets, but as the Americans discovered to their huge cost over Europe, daylight raids made them fish in a barrel and easy pickings for axis gunners.
And as a positive having them in easy view of the population was a big morale booster. Likewise having them firing even if there weren't aircraft within any sort of realistic range, a whole load of them going off made people think there were more than there actually were.

Ayahuasca

27,581 posts

308 months

Tuesday 25th August 2020
quotequote all
They were more useful sited near to the target for at least two reasons - firstly, that was where the enemy bombers would converge, secondly, you could disrupt their bomb aiming.

Sited along their coast they were easily avoided.