Expensive crowded trains
Expensive crowded trains

Poll: Expensive crowded trains

Total Members Polled: 83

Expensive despite being overcrowded.: 41%
Overcrowded despite being expensive.: 46%
Expensive because overcrowded.: 13%
Author
Discussion

Dr Jekyll

Original Poster:

23,820 posts

290 months

Friday 2nd April 2021
quotequote all
Our offices are opening up next month and there is much discussion about having to pay hundreds of pounds a month to be crammed into overcrowded trains and tubes. But is the view of 'it's outrageous to have to pay so much when it's so uncomfortable' the most realistic analysis?

Spare tyre

12,557 posts

159 months

Friday 2nd April 2021
quotequote all
I was really unwell on a train from Waterloo a few years ago

Had some bug, was far too hot, crammed in the standing doorway area


It was brandford and bingley
Ant and dec
Alliance and Leicester
Etc

Suddenly everyone else found space elsewhere

2/10, don’t recommend

Ice_blue_tvr

3,498 posts

193 months

Friday 2nd April 2021
quotequote all
I've always used the overground into Liverpool St.. I now have to travel via Central line.. What a shambles.. And the hoards of people haven't even returned to work yet..

The scam that is crossrail should eventually come in and alleviate some of the crowding.. But I have the feeling it'll be more like bringing a service from 120% capacity back down to 100% capacity.. As the years or operating under capacity have already been surpassed by delays in opening the line and numbers have already gone up..

Hopefully more people stagger travel and wfh.. But again, there are already times the tube is overcrowded when people are supposed to be at home/social distancing..

So to answer the question.. The poll needs an option for both Expensive AND overcrowded..

Spare tyre

12,557 posts

159 months

Friday 2nd April 2021
quotequote all
I think we need a monorail

anonymous-user

83 months

Friday 2nd April 2021
quotequote all
Spare tyre said:
I think we need a monorail
That’s more of a Shelbyville idea...

grumbledoak

32,571 posts

262 months

Friday 2nd April 2021
quotequote all
They charge what the market can bear. Plus subsidies.

Dr Jekyll

Original Poster:

23,820 posts

290 months

Friday 2nd April 2021
quotequote all
Ice_blue_tvr said:
I've always used the overground into Liverpool St.. I now have to travel via Central line.. What a shambles.. And the hoards of people haven't even returned to work yet..

The scam that is crossrail should eventually come in and alleviate some of the crowding.. But I have the feeling it'll be more like bringing a service from 120% capacity back down to 100% capacity.. As the years or operating under capacity have already been surpassed by delays in opening the line and numbers have already gone up..

Hopefully more people stagger travel and wfh.. But again, there are already times the tube is overcrowded when people are supposed to be at home/social distancing..

So to answer the question.. The poll needs an option for both Expensive AND overcrowded..
All three options are both expensive and overcrowded, the question is about the relationship between the two.

Ice_blue_tvr

3,498 posts

193 months

Friday 2nd April 2021
quotequote all
Dr Jekyll said:
Ice_blue_tvr said:
I've always used the overground into Liverpool St.. I now have to travel via Central line.. What a shambles.. And the hoards of people haven't even returned to work yet..

The scam that is crossrail should eventually come in and alleviate some of the crowding.. But I have the feeling it'll be more like bringing a service from 120% capacity back down to 100% capacity.. As the years or operating under capacity have already been surpassed by delays in opening the line and numbers have already gone up..

Hopefully more people stagger travel and wfh.. But again, there are already times the tube is overcrowded when people are supposed to be at home/social distancing..

So to answer the question.. The poll needs an option for both Expensive AND overcrowded..
All three options are both expensive and overcrowded, the question is about the relationship between the two.
But you could remove the cost and make it free.. It would still be overcrowded... And on the flip side have enough space for everyone to be seated and it'd still feel expensive for what it is.

Fwiw, I voted overcrowded despite being expensive.. But that makes it sound like one part of the equation would be bearable in isolation. I'd argue that's not the case.

bristolbaron

5,375 posts

241 months

Friday 2nd April 2021
quotequote all
LyleLangley said:
Spare tyre said:
I think we need a monorail
That’s more of a Shelbyville idea...
Monorail? Monorail. Monorail!!!

Jasandjules

72,588 posts

258 months

Friday 2nd April 2021
quotequote all
Where is the "Not worth the Costs" options.

Spare tyre

12,557 posts

159 months

Friday 2nd April 2021
quotequote all
I’ve never understood why the Swindon monorail isn’t repeated in every town
Clean, cheap, efficient- up its superb

Monkeylegend

29,213 posts

260 months

Friday 2nd April 2021
quotequote all
Have they not been like that for many years now though so nothing new really.

We went on a train journey through Germany to Austria a few years ago, it was 110 miles each way, the trains ran to the second, were clean, we all had comfortable seats, and all this for 12 euros return each.

spikeyhead

20,397 posts

226 months

Friday 2nd April 2021
quotequote all
What we need is a network of trebuchets and trampolines so we can fly free through the air to wherever we want to be.

Monkeylegend said:
Have they not been like that for many years now though so nothing new really.

We went on a train journey through Germany to Austria a few years ago, it was 110 miles each way, the trains ran to the second, were clean, we all had comfortable seats, and all this for 12 euros return each.
...is it that cheap because of some marvellous German efficiency, or is it heavily subsidised by taxpayers.

red_slr

20,698 posts

218 months

Friday 2nd April 2021
quotequote all
Given the railway industry has some of the top paid jobs in the UK it does baffle me why people are shocked the cost for a ticket is so high.

When the person driving the train is on £90k a year, the conductor £50k a year and the signal operator £40k a year suddenly getting that train from A to B costs a lot more than you might think.



Gecko1978

12,302 posts

186 months

Friday 2nd April 2021
quotequote all
red_slr said:
Given the railway industry has some of the top paid jobs in the UK it does baffle me why people are shocked the cost for a ticket is so high.

When the person driving the train is on £90k a year, the conductor £50k a year and the signal operator £40k a year suddenly getting that train from A to B costs a lot more than you might think.
well lets hope WFH and flexible working are here to stay then as say 2 days WFH a week is 40% reduction in train journeys and then its a lot harder to justify those salaries, say WFH becomes 3 days then 60% fall in travel how long before normal makes public transport prices pointless.

We will always need public transport but the rail firms and TFL take the pee as does mayor of london so WFH is a way for commuters to push back and say enough, either better, cheaper system or we won't use it. Think of all the times they go on strike well we the public can do the same now see how they like it

Monkeylegend

29,213 posts

260 months

Friday 2nd April 2021
quotequote all
spikeyhead said:
What we need is a network of trebuchets and trampolines so we can fly free through the air to wherever we want to be.

Monkeylegend said:
Have they not been like that for many years now though so nothing new really.

We went on a train journey through Germany to Austria a few years ago, it was 110 miles each way, the trains ran to the second, were clean, we all had comfortable seats, and all this for 12 euros return each.
...is it that cheap because of some marvellous German efficiency, or is it heavily subsidised by taxpayers.
I have no iodea and didn't bother to ask, just mightily impressed.

QuickQuack

2,810 posts

130 months

Friday 2nd April 2021
quotequote all
Utterly NSFW and equally applicable to all rail transport...

https://youtu.be/6ElmE-cCtXs

Rostfritt

3,098 posts

180 months

Friday 2nd April 2021
quotequote all
They're going to have to do something about season tickets. Who is going to be happy to pay for a ticket for travel every day when they are going to be working from home a lot of the time? There should be some option of maybe a number of journeys each year or week that is cheaper than just buying a return each time you go into the office. Otherwise people are going to either drive in or just go in nearly every day because they have already paid for their season ticket.

vaud

59,403 posts

184 months

Friday 2nd April 2021
quotequote all
Monkeylegend said:
Have they not been like that for many years now though so nothing new really.

We went on a train journey through Germany to Austria a few years ago, it was 110 miles each way, the trains ran to the second, were clean, we all had comfortable seats, and all this for 12 euros return each.
It isn't what it once was:

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/dec/20/trai...

Monkeylegend

29,213 posts

260 months

Friday 2nd April 2021
quotequote all
vaud said:
Monkeylegend said:
Have they not been like that for many years now though so nothing new really.

We went on a train journey through Germany to Austria a few years ago, it was 110 miles each way, the trains ran to the second, were clean, we all had comfortable seats, and all this for 12 euros return each.
It isn't what it once was:

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/dec/20/trai...
Heads need to roll, that is disgraceful.