Son’s maths question (10yo). Am I fick?
Discussion
Is it not 5.5cm^2?
1/2 x L x H to work out the area for each of the triangles (shown in the left margin) and subtract the smaller figure from the larger figure.
Wait, no that would be the total difference in size...... Its been a long day
Hmmm, the actual answer........
1/2 x L x H to work out the area for each of the triangles (shown in the left margin) and subtract the smaller figure from the larger figure.
Wait, no that would be the total difference in size...... Its been a long day

Hmmm, the actual answer........

Edited by McVities on Thursday 29th July 19:42
It's a long time since A level further maths. And geometry was never my strong suit.
But (one way) is to consider that the shaded triangle is similar to the largest triangle, and must have sides in the ratio (7/5). Importantly, we can say the same for any triangle which shares the hypotenuse of the large triangle.
The size of the smaller triangle is immaterial, but it is important to know that the bottom right corner is exactly aligned to the grid.
So what we need to work out is the lengths of the two sides of the shaded triangle - let's call them x and y.
Consider the small triangle formed at the very top right, from the corner of the big triangle to the corner of the shaded one. We know the base of this is 1 square wide (because the smaller triangle is aligned to the grid), so therefore it must be (1 x (5/7)) high.
Now look at the triangle similarly formed at the bottom left; we know this is two squares high, so again following the logic above it must be (2 x (7/5)) squares wide.
This gives us everything we need. We know that
<width of big triangle> = <width of bottom left triangle> + x + <width of top right triangle>, and
<height of big triangle> = <height of bottom left triangle> + y + <height of top right triangle>
Rearranging and plugging in the numbers:
x = 7 - (2 x 7/5) - 1
y = 5 - 5/7 - 2
x = 16 / 5
y = 16 / 7
(sense check: this is consistent with our previous assertion that x:y must be in the ratio 7:5)
So the area = (x * y) / 2 = (256 / 35) / 2 = 3.66
I think, anyway. Like I say it's been a while.
But (one way) is to consider that the shaded triangle is similar to the largest triangle, and must have sides in the ratio (7/5). Importantly, we can say the same for any triangle which shares the hypotenuse of the large triangle.
The size of the smaller triangle is immaterial, but it is important to know that the bottom right corner is exactly aligned to the grid.
So what we need to work out is the lengths of the two sides of the shaded triangle - let's call them x and y.
Consider the small triangle formed at the very top right, from the corner of the big triangle to the corner of the shaded one. We know the base of this is 1 square wide (because the smaller triangle is aligned to the grid), so therefore it must be (1 x (5/7)) high.
Now look at the triangle similarly formed at the bottom left; we know this is two squares high, so again following the logic above it must be (2 x (7/5)) squares wide.
This gives us everything we need. We know that
<width of big triangle> = <width of bottom left triangle> + x + <width of top right triangle>, and
<height of big triangle> = <height of bottom left triangle> + y + <height of top right triangle>
Rearranging and plugging in the numbers:
x = 7 - (2 x 7/5) - 1
y = 5 - 5/7 - 2
x = 16 / 5
y = 16 / 7
(sense check: this is consistent with our previous assertion that x:y must be in the ratio 7:5)
So the area = (x * y) / 2 = (256 / 35) / 2 = 3.66
I think, anyway. Like I say it's been a while.
Great thing about maths is there's always a mark scheme
(M for method, A for accuracy, if memory serves me correct of marking kid's homework for mother)
It wouldn't be trig because I can't remember that showing up until Year 8/9 ?
(M for method, A for accuracy, if memory serves me correct of marking kid's homework for mother)
It wouldn't be trig because I can't remember that showing up until Year 8/9 ?
Gassing Station | The Lounge | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff



t the bed
