Are Some Graves Eternal?
Are Some Graves Eternal?
Author
Discussion

Glassman

Original Poster:

24,948 posts

244 months

Monday 20th September 2021
quotequote all
Recently I took my kids to Marcham, near Abingdon to visit my grand, and great grandparents' graves. All Saints Church has a quite a few very old graves around the building, some of which are so old you can't read the inscriptions on the headstones.

There is also no room for any more burials, so there is a separate burial 'garden' to the church which is also full. My grandparents are buried in for what is basically the overflow.

My kids asked how come the world isn't full of graves if everyone gets buried etc. We had a nice chat about it as we walked back from the church, but it got me thinking. Graves and the recycling of graves/tombs etc. Some religions bury their dead. At what point does each grave become a forgotten burial? When the lease runs out? When, after several generations, they simply no longer carry any more sentiment than family history? For example, my great aunts and uncles are also buried there but I never met them. I also never met my great grandparents. When the generation before me passes on, there's nobody in my generation who is interested in those all but forgotten generations.

If they are forgotten, when do their graves become 'available' as it were?

Looking on the flip-side, what about those 18th century tombs and graves immediately outside the church? Many of them are hardly visible; not exactly visited for any reason whatsoever, so why not recycle those?

Edited by Glassman on Monday 20th September 16:18

P-Jay

11,403 posts

220 months

Monday 20th September 2021
quotequote all
I'm by no means an expert, but In central Cardiff there's a Church called St John's (or St. John the Baptist), there's been a church on that site since 1180, although it was rebuilt in the 15th Century.

The in the late 1800s a In-door market was built next to it (it's also still there), they built a walkway right through the grave yard called "Dead Man's Alley" over the decades they graves have been marked by brass numbers mounted to the pavement, or now with numbers engraved into the paving, still showing where the remains of people buried over 800 years ago lay.

In the village my Parents live outside of Cardiff one of their neighbours has a garden full of headstones, surrounded by plants, someone renovated a small Chapel into a house about 50 years ago, but the headstones (some of which are well over 100 years old) still remain.

Apparently with the new larger burial sites you usual see in Cities when you buy a plot, you're really buying the rights for exclusive use of it for a set period of time, 25-100 years, if you don't renew it, then they take away the headstone and plonk someone else in.

Edited by P-Jay on Monday 20th September 14:18

anonymous-user

83 months

Monday 20th September 2021
quotequote all
In Paris they moved the bones of between 6 and 7 million people to the catacombs beneath Paris in 1786.

In London, graves can be reused after 75 years

https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2016/may/0...

Plus not everyone is buried as it is crazy expensive these days and 77% of people were cremated in 2017

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by...

Edited by anonymous-user on Monday 20th September 14:42

mikey_b

2,684 posts

74 months

Monday 20th September 2021
quotequote all
The graveyards of many very old churches appear somewhat higher than the pathways and floor level of the church. This is because they keep digging holes in the ground and putting in a coffin, they backfill of course but over very long periods of time, old graves get reused multiple times and the ground level slowly rises.

There's a passage in Bill Bryson's book 'At Home: A Short History of Private Life' where he describes moving into an old rectory in Norfolk, overlooking the churchyard. He did some sums based on the known size of the village over the centuries, and calculated roughly how people would have died every year and been buried in the church. He worked out that a few feet from his new house were the remains of about 20,000 people, layered into the ground such that the church itself seemed to be sinking into the rising level of the surrounding graves.

buggalugs

9,282 posts

266 months

Monday 20th September 2021
quotequote all
I walked around the Jewish cemetary at Lodz and there are sections that are now no longer being maintained, trees are being allowed to grow, topping headstones and disturbing the graves and everything is re-wilding. I seem to recall there's a certain time cut off there. The place had a very sombre beauty about it.

choc0late cupcock

732 posts

62 months

Monday 20th September 2021
quotequote all
buggalugs said:
I walked around the Jewish cemetary at Lodz and there are sections that are now no longer being maintained, trees are being allowed to grow, topping headstones and disturbing the graves and everything is re-wilding. I seem to recall there's a certain time cut off there. The place had a very sombre beauty about it.
i oft wondered if the bit in schindler's list where roads in the camps were paved with headstones was an artistic invention or factual

voram

9,655 posts

63 months

Monday 20th September 2021
quotequote all
One oddity among such matters is King Richard III who was dug up from under a car park in Leicester,
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exhumation_and_rebur...

They did at least have the decency to rebury his remains at the cathedral.

Another is construction of the Crossrail project in London where many victims of the 1665 Great Plague had to be moved,
https://www.crossrail.co.uk/news/articles/suspecte...

Krupp88

609 posts

156 months

Monday 20th September 2021
quotequote all
mikey_b said:
The graveyards of many very old churches appear somewhat higher than the pathways and floor level of the church. This is because they keep digging holes in the ground and putting in a coffin, they backfill of course but over very long periods of time, old graves get reused multiple times and the ground level slowly rises.

There's a passage in Bill Bryson's book 'At Home: A Short History of Private Life' where he describes moving into an old rectory in Norfolk, overlooking the churchyard. He did some sums based on the known size of the village over the centuries, and calculated roughly how people would have died every year and been buried in the church. He worked out that a few feet from his new house were the remains of about 20,000 people, layered into the ground such that the church itself seemed to be sinking into the rising level of the surrounding graves.
The burials wont just be neatly laid out, there will be everywhere in your typical village churchyard. Which causes problems when the church wants to do some building work (such as a toilet block) and human remains turn up under paths ect.

StevieBee

15,310 posts

284 months

Monday 20th September 2021
quotequote all
Krupp88 said:
mikey_b said:
The graveyards of many very old churches appear somewhat higher than the pathways and floor level of the church. This is because they keep digging holes in the ground and putting in a coffin, they backfill of course but over very long periods of time, old graves get reused multiple times and the ground level slowly rises.

There's a passage in Bill Bryson's book 'At Home: A Short History of Private Life' where he describes moving into an old rectory in Norfolk, overlooking the churchyard. He did some sums based on the known size of the village over the centuries, and calculated roughly how people would have died every year and been buried in the church. He worked out that a few feet from his new house were the remains of about 20,000 people, layered into the ground such that the church itself seemed to be sinking into the rising level of the surrounding graves.
The burials wont just be neatly laid out, there will be everywhere in your typical village churchyard. Which causes problems when the church wants to do some building work (such as a toilet block) and human remains turn up under paths ect.
Burial plots are very well documented in terms of who's buried and where. I believe they are the oldest form of municipal record keeping in the UK pre-dating the Domseday Book. A lot of these records have long been lost but the issue you refer to is mainly caused by the land shifting over time. So Frank Smith may be resting several meters away from where he was buried in 1456.

Cremation was introduced as a way to limit the need for graveyards. Bryson's book that Mikey mentions includes the difficulty the authorities had in introducing this.



wobblyweb

141 posts

258 months

Monday 20th September 2021
quotequote all
Cemetery rather than a graveyard but an interesting one in Newcastle used as a park
Ballast Hills Burial Ground
The burial ground, known locally as Plaguey Fields or Grannies Park, was the most important con-conformist graveyard in Newcastle in the early and mid-seventeenth century, when many Protestant, Quaker, Baptist and Methodist immigrants buried their dead here.
Use of the ground was heavy throughout the plague years and only fell out of use when the 1853-54 cholera epidemic closed all graveyards.
In 1930 the ground was laid out as a play area and the remaining tombstones, around 200, laid down as flagging for paths, with the exception of those former non-conformist ministers, which can be found upright in one corner of the site.



PAUL500

3,241 posts

275 months

Monday 20th September 2021
quotequote all
Took my daughter to the village church close to my grandparents farm recently.

My grandad is in the overflow part, but we started looking around the church grounds, and found his fathers grave, then we found the grave of that one's father, and then that ones father as well, I was amazed how far back we could link them all, not fallen far from the tree it seems my ancestors.

Got me thinking if anyone 4 generations after us would be doing the same and wondering what we were like.

bobtail4x4

4,406 posts

138 months

Monday 20th September 2021
quotequote all
StevieBee said:
Krupp88 said:
mikey_b said:
The graveyards of many very old churches appear somewhat higher than the pathways and floor level of the church. This is because they keep digging holes in the ground and putting in a coffin, they backfill of course but over very long periods of time, old graves get reused multiple times and the ground level slowly rises.

There's a passage in Bill Bryson's book 'At Home: A Short History of Private Life' where he describes moving into an old rectory in Norfolk, overlooking the churchyard. He did some sums based on the known size of the village over the centuries, and calculated roughly how people would have died every year and been buried in the church. He worked out that a few feet from his new house were the remains of about 20,000 people, layered into the ground such that the church itself seemed to be sinking into the rising level of the surrounding graves.
The burials wont just be neatly laid out, there will be everywhere in your typical village churchyard. Which causes problems when the church wants to do some building work (such as a toilet block) and human remains turn up under paths ect.
Burial plots are very well documented in terms of who's buried and where. I believe they are the oldest form of municipal record keeping in the UK pre-dating the Domseday Book. A lot of these records have long been lost but the issue you refer to is mainly caused by the land shifting over time. So Frank Smith may be resting several meters away from where he was buried in 1456.

Cremation was introduced as a way to limit the need for graveyards. Bryson's book that Mikey mentions includes the difficulty the authorities had in introducing this.
a few years back most churches locally needed a WC for the old dears, and often a kitchen of sorts,
I have lost count of the number of remains found, one that sticks in the memory was the pink feet of a 3 weeks old burial being disturbed, they dug the trench further over to avoid a large tree.

anonymous-user

83 months

Monday 20th September 2021
quotequote all
I’ve dug up literally hundreds of people in my career. Some have been in the ground thousands of years some probably less than a hundred.

Burial is simply a process whereby decomposition can take place cleanly and out of sight. By and large this is all done quite quickly even the bones start to dissolve quite quickly in acid soils, especially soft and thinner bones in child burials.

I’ve seen lots of intercutting burials with up to four or five inhumations basically cut through each other often with the earlier remains neatly cut through.

vikingaero

13,248 posts

198 months

Monday 20th September 2021
quotequote all
As an illustration of costs for a burial plot: My Nan died in 1996 and my Dad paid £84 for the plot. Thinking of his and my Mums mortality, he paid a further £180 for the 2 adjacent plots. My Aunt died about 4 years ago and my Cousins paid around £36,000 for a plot in Kemnal Park in South London.
Monday 20th September 2021
quotequote all
As we are all literally made from stardust - I have no issue with not being buried. A decent cremation - might speed the process on a little bit....

LordHaveMurci

12,336 posts

198 months

Monday 20th September 2021
quotequote all
vikingaero said:
As an illustration of costs for a burial plot: My Nan died in 1996 and my Dad paid £84 for the plot. Thinking of his and my Mums mortality, he paid a further £180 for the 2 adjacent plots. My Aunt died about 4 years ago and my Cousins paid around £36,000 for a plot in Kemnal Park in South London.
yikes

anonymous-user

83 months

Monday 20th September 2021
quotequote all
LordHaveMurci said:
vikingaero said:
As an illustration of costs for a burial plot: My Nan died in 1996 and my Dad paid £84 for the plot. Thinking of his and my Mums mortality, he paid a further £180 for the 2 adjacent plots. My Aunt died about 4 years ago and my Cousins paid around £36,000 for a plot in Kemnal Park in South London.
yikes
A friend of mine’s parents spent an absolute fortune on burial plots a few years ago. They desperately wanted ‘his n hers’ side by side plots as close to the church entrance as possible, and the church utterly rinsed them over the cost.

They were regular churchgoers and wanted ‘the best’ plots apparently.

LordHaveMurci

12,336 posts

198 months

Monday 20th September 2021
quotequote all
May have to revise my will, currently states that I am to be buried, not cremated.

Poor kids will have no inheritance left hehe

bloomen

10,067 posts

188 months

Monday 20th September 2021
quotequote all
It boggles my mind that anyone would anything beyond the absolute minimum on post life residences. One's descendants surely have a strong financial incentive to skimp as much as possible.

I intend to get someone to luzz my carcass out the back of a van somewhere on a Belgian motorway. If I'm rotten enough I should disintegrate on impact and the birds will get the scraps.

Zad

13,007 posts

265 months

Monday 20th September 2021
quotequote all
Not long ago, my mum's burial plot in the church graveyard where her parents and other ancestors are buried cost £1000 and the contract is for 100 years. There aren't many places left now, and I suspect it will be closed in around 10 years and another graveyard opened somewhere. I do wonder where all the remains are, as the church dates back to well before 1275 - although logically it wasn't as heavily populated back then as it has been since Victorian times. I would expect that disinterring and all that that involves is quite expensive, and buying a couple of farmer's fields where all you have to do is dig a hole would be quite a lot more cost-effective.