English grammar question
Discussion
Which, if any, of these phrases is correct?
Paul said, “she’s tall”, the other person disagreed.
Paul said, “She’s tall.” the other person disagreed.
Paul said, “She’s tall.” The other person disagreed.
Paul said, “She’s tall,” The other person disagreed.
I have an opinion, my teacher missus has an opinion, my student children concur with our opinion. Chat GPT disagrees with us all.
I said this one:
Paul said, “She’s tall.” The other person disagreed.
One of my children said this one:
Paul said, “She’s tall.” the other person disagreed.
Chat GPT agreed with me.
Child argued with Chat GPT, who now agrees with them, on the basis that the speech is a sub-sentence and "the" is a continuation of the sentence.
Paul said, “She’s tall.” The other person disagreed.
One of my children said this one:
Paul said, “She’s tall.” the other person disagreed.
Chat GPT agreed with me.
Child argued with Chat GPT, who now agrees with them, on the basis that the speech is a sub-sentence and "the" is a continuation of the sentence.
Louis Balfour said:
I said this one:
Paul said, “She’s tall.” The other person disagreed.
One of my children said this one:
Paul said, “She’s tall.” the other person disagreed.
Chat GPT agreed with me.
Child argued with Chat GPT, who now agrees with them, on the basis that the speech is a sub-sentence and "the" is a continuation of the sentence.
You were right. To make it into a single sentence you'd use a conjunction, but it would read awkwardly.Paul said, “She’s tall.” The other person disagreed.
One of my children said this one:
Paul said, “She’s tall.” the other person disagreed.
Chat GPT agreed with me.
Child argued with Chat GPT, who now agrees with them, on the basis that the speech is a sub-sentence and "the" is a continuation of the sentence.
TooLateForAName said:
of those, the first. But they're all poor.
Also chatgpt is not in any way to be trusted as a source of expertise.
Agreed on both counts.Also chatgpt is not in any way to be trusted as a source of expertise.
I agreed to apply my sage-like wisdom to the problem on behalf of someone else, who is arguing with a solicitor about it. So the problem is what it is, we cannot reframe it.
Someone, somewhere, is paying £400 per hour +VAT to be involved in this argument.
Gassing Station | The Lounge | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff



