Pervert Scientists
Discussion
This VV was in my professional journal:
Study: The Effects of Breast Support on Kinetics During Overground Running Performance.
Participants:
Eight female participants with physical characteristics: mean age 24.8, height 1.66m body mass 66kg band size 34...exclusion criteria: had be aged between 18-40....currently active in sports...were a D-cup breast size...The study was approved by the Institutional Ethics committee.
So they basically only picked young fit women with massive top-b
ks.
They then filmed the women's tits as they bounced along whilst running measuring the displacement of the breast with various Bras. FFS I'm in the wrong job.
Study: The Effects of Breast Support on Kinetics During Overground Running Performance.
Participants:
Eight female participants with physical characteristics: mean age 24.8, height 1.66m body mass 66kg band size 34...exclusion criteria: had be aged between 18-40....currently active in sports...were a D-cup breast size...The study was approved by the Institutional Ethics committee.
So they basically only picked young fit women with massive top-b
ks.They then filmed the women's tits as they bounced along whilst running measuring the displacement of the breast with various Bras. FFS I'm in the wrong job.
rhinochopig said:
This VV was in my professional journal:
Study: The Effects of Breast Support on Kinetics During Overground Running Performance.
Participants:
Eight female participants with physical characteristics: mean age 24.8, height 1.66m body mass 66kg band size 34...exclusion criteria: had be aged between 18-40....currently active in sports...were a D-cup breast size...The study was approved by the Institutional Ethics committee.
So they basically only picked young fit women with massive top-bks.
They then filmed the women's tits as they bounced along whilst running measuring the displacement of the breast with various Bras. FFS I'm in the wrong job.
I'm waiting for the followup study into underground running performance.Study: The Effects of Breast Support on Kinetics During Overground Running Performance.
Participants:
Eight female participants with physical characteristics: mean age 24.8, height 1.66m body mass 66kg band size 34...exclusion criteria: had be aged between 18-40....currently active in sports...were a D-cup breast size...The study was approved by the Institutional Ethics committee.
So they basically only picked young fit women with massive top-b
ks.They then filmed the women's tits as they bounced along whilst running measuring the displacement of the breast with various Bras. FFS I'm in the wrong job.
Einion Yrth said:
rhinochopig said:
This VV was in my professional journal:
Study: The Effects of Breast Support on Kinetics During Overground Running Performance.
Participants:
Eight female participants with physical characteristics: mean age 24.8, height 1.66m body mass 66kg band size 34...exclusion criteria: had be aged between 18-40....currently active in sports...were a D-cup breast size...The study was approved by the Institutional Ethics committee.
So they basically only picked young fit women with massive top-bks.
They then filmed the women's tits as they bounced along whilst running measuring the displacement of the breast with various Bras. FFS I'm in the wrong job.
I'm waiting for the followup study into underground running performance.Study: The Effects of Breast Support on Kinetics During Overground Running Performance.
Participants:
Eight female participants with physical characteristics: mean age 24.8, height 1.66m body mass 66kg band size 34...exclusion criteria: had be aged between 18-40....currently active in sports...were a D-cup breast size...The study was approved by the Institutional Ethics committee.
So they basically only picked young fit women with massive top-b
ks.They then filmed the women's tits as they bounced along whilst running measuring the displacement of the breast with various Bras. FFS I'm in the wrong job.
Edited by Steamer on Thursday 21st May 11:40
my mate had a job watching women shave in the shower, via video link.
He worked for a well know shaving company. They would have 200 poeople come into their shaving test centre every morning to shave, using existing and new test razors.
The women (wearing bikinis) would be observed via video link. To study how they use the razors.
Apparentely women hold the razor 50 different ways, whereas men only 10. Women also shave much more body surface than men and start shaving earlier.
He worked for a well know shaving company. They would have 200 poeople come into their shaving test centre every morning to shave, using existing and new test razors.
The women (wearing bikinis) would be observed via video link. To study how they use the razors.
Apparentely women hold the razor 50 different ways, whereas men only 10. Women also shave much more body surface than men and start shaving earlier.
kind fog signs said:
my mate had a job watching women shave in the shower, via video link.
He worked for a well know shaving company. They would have 200 poeople come into their shaving test centre every morning to shave, using existing and new test razors.
The women (wearing bikinis) would be observed via video link. To study how they use the razors.
Apparentely women hold the razor 50 different ways, whereas men only 10. Women also shave much more body surface than men and start shaving earlier.
Did the participants know they were being filmed?He worked for a well know shaving company. They would have 200 poeople come into their shaving test centre every morning to shave, using existing and new test razors.
The women (wearing bikinis) would be observed via video link. To study how they use the razors.
Apparentely women hold the razor 50 different ways, whereas men only 10. Women also shave much more body surface than men and start shaving earlier.
dave_s13 said:
kind fog signs said:
my mate had a job watching women shave in the shower, via video link.
He worked for a well know shaving company. They would have 200 poeople come into their shaving test centre every morning to shave, using existing and new test razors.
The women (wearing bikinis) would be observed via video link. To study how they use the razors.
Apparentely women hold the razor 50 different ways, whereas men only 10. Women also shave much more body surface than men and start shaving earlier.
Did the participants know they were being filmed?He worked for a well know shaving company. They would have 200 poeople come into their shaving test centre every morning to shave, using existing and new test razors.
The women (wearing bikinis) would be observed via video link. To study how they use the razors.
Apparentely women hold the razor 50 different ways, whereas men only 10. Women also shave much more body surface than men and start shaving earlier.
Edited by rhinochopig on Thursday 21st May 13:00
Edited by rhinochopig on Thursday 21st May 13:01
Link OK for work
Exercise unleashes a bounce bras can't handle. Breasts fly up and down a distance of up to 8 inches, study says
Exercise unleashes a bounce bras can't handle. Breasts fly up and down a distance of up to 8 inches, study says
Uhura_Fighter said:
Link OK for work
Exercise unleashes a bounce bras can't handle. Breasts fly up and down a distance of up to 8 inches, study says
Eeerrmmmmm we need video evidence to back up that theory or we just wont buy into itExercise unleashes a bounce bras can't handle. Breasts fly up and down a distance of up to 8 inches, study says
rhinochopig said:
This VV was in my professional journal:
Study: The Effects of Breast Support on Kinetics During Overground Running Performance.
Participants:
Eight female participants with physical characteristics: mean age 24.8, height 1.66m body mass 66kg band size 34...exclusion criteria: had be aged between 18-40....currently active in sports...were a D-cup breast size...The study was approved by the Institutional Ethics committee.
So they basically only picked young fit women with massive top-bks.
They then filmed the women's tits as they bounced along whilst running measuring the displacement of the breast with various Bras. FFS I'm in the wrong job.
Easy enough...if you've letters after your name (make some up if you haven't) you could start your own project into anything you like (if you write a proposal with enough BS in it) AND get millions in Government funding too...Study: The Effects of Breast Support on Kinetics During Overground Running Performance.
Participants:
Eight female participants with physical characteristics: mean age 24.8, height 1.66m body mass 66kg band size 34...exclusion criteria: had be aged between 18-40....currently active in sports...were a D-cup breast size...The study was approved by the Institutional Ethics committee.
So they basically only picked young fit women with massive top-b
ks.They then filmed the women's tits as they bounced along whilst running measuring the displacement of the breast with various Bras. FFS I'm in the wrong job.
It's been done, time and time again
Kentish said:
Part of my work has been to review studies looking into the effects of various compounds on female sexual arousal
And the results? Let me guess... there is no substance known to humankind that can stimulate a woman who's not 'up for it'?God, don't we all wish there was?
kind fog signs said:
Women also shave much more body surface than men
Well bugger me backwards with a fish fork. Do they really? Who would have imagined that legs, arms (if you're unlucky), underarms, and pretty much anywhere else it grows apart from your head and muff, is a greater body surface than just your face? 
Gassing Station | The Lounge | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff