Partner/offspring Using your credit card is illegal
Partner/offspring Using your credit card is illegal

Poll: Partner/offspring Using your credit card is illegal

Total Members Polled: 112

Yes: 44%
No: 26%
Yes but still let them do it: 30%
Author
Discussion

tmk2

Original Poster:

708 posts

230 months

Saturday 27th June 2009
quotequote all
We recently have been getting/noticing a huge number of Card holder not present cases at work with mainly parents giving them their cards to use, unfortunaatly it is illegal and we have to call our merchant banker to assert if the card is stolen (which is a pain) also has a high chance of the card being destroyed. Just wondering if people are aware that you cannot do this.

Mods can you keep this in the lounge till I get a few votes

Edited by tmk2 on Saturday 27th June 20:06

BonzoGuinness

1,554 posts

236 months

Saturday 27th June 2009
quotequote all
Doesn't "Cardholder Not Present" refer to telephone/postal transactions, rather than someone other than the cardholder using the actual card say at an ATM or in a chip and pin terminal?

ray_von

2,931 posts

274 months

Saturday 27th June 2009
quotequote all
Eh? Cars/cards?? What are you on about?

va1o

16,094 posts

229 months

Saturday 27th June 2009
quotequote all
I used to use my parents card to pay for stuff online when I was much younger, never thought it was illegal to do that as I had their permission?

GreenV8S

30,998 posts

306 months

Saturday 27th June 2009
quotequote all
tmk2 said:
Partner/offspring Using your credit card is illegal
Which law do you think it would be breaking?

Mexico.

1,254 posts

209 months

Saturday 27th June 2009
quotequote all
What stolen car/card are you talking about irked

Cheers

The meerkat

tmk2

Original Poster:

708 posts

230 months

Saturday 27th June 2009
quotequote all
BonzoGuinness said:
Doesn't "Cardholder Not Present" refer to telephone/postal transactions, rather than someone other than the cardholder using the actual card say at an ATM or in a chip and pin terminal?
its what our merchant classes it as, as it isn't strictly a code ten or a authorization

Simond001

4,519 posts

299 months

Saturday 27th June 2009
quotequote all
It may not suit your merchant, but that doesnt make it illegal.


bigandclever

14,192 posts

260 months

Saturday 27th June 2009
quotequote all
I'm assuming you're talking about face to face transactions. I could imagine it being against the terms of the credit card company for the cardholder to let someone else use their card, but not 'illegal'. Anyway, if you're suspicious of the person presenting the card isn't that what the Code 10 is for?

Nolar Dog

8,786 posts

217 months

Saturday 27th June 2009
quotequote all
I regularly either give my card to people to use without me present or pass them the required details if they wish to use it online.


anonymous-user

76 months

Saturday 27th June 2009
quotequote all
If you you have a look as the details, this is not illegal, just breach of T&C of the credit card company...

loafer123

16,364 posts

237 months

Saturday 27th June 2009
quotequote all

Isn't it common practise in the US, even for face to face transactions?

bigandclever

14,192 posts

260 months

Saturday 27th June 2009
quotequote all
The problem will be that the proper cardholder could just flag the transaction as fraudulent, after all the cardholder wasn't present. The credit company will investigate and require proof from the shop (or whatever) that all appropriate steps were taken to ensure it was a legit transaction. If the shop can't do that, and they haven't got an agreement from their merchant that they can accept CNP transactions, then the shop will be liable for the transaction. So the shop has 2 choices: go with a merchant scheme that will allow them to do CNP transactions; or as a policy refuse them - which sounds like the case here. The 'illegal' bit is still, I think, erroneous but it's a good excuse to tell the customer facing lot.

Yorkshire Tea

228 posts

222 months

Saturday 27th June 2009
quotequote all
Its against the terms of conditions of the accounts of the bank I work for, but that doesnt mean its illegal

snuffle

1,587 posts

204 months

Saturday 27th June 2009
quotequote all
Nolar Dog said:
I regularly either give my card to people to use without me present or pass them the required details if they wish to use it online.
If I say please and thankyou do I qualify?

Simpo Two

91,012 posts

287 months

Saturday 27th June 2009
quotequote all
Teenage daughter got sale rejected in Tescos when she tried to use her mother's debit card, even though she had permission.

You can see why - it would be all too easy for a wayward teenager to steal their parenbt's card and go beserk with it.

Nolar Dog

8,786 posts

217 months

Saturday 27th June 2009
quotequote all
I'm suprised anyone even checked the card to ascertain it wasn't hers.

Poledriver

29,250 posts

216 months

Sunday 28th June 2009
quotequote all
Nolar Dog said:
I regularly either give my card to people to use without me present or pass them the required details if they wish to use it online.
I've just found a new supercharged engine for a bargain £4,000! Please can you PM me you card details?

Ow

1,630 posts

219 months

Sunday 28th June 2009
quotequote all
I had my mums card to pay for some food shopping the other week, about £150 probably and when it came to paying I realised there was no chip and pin machine!
The girl on the till said 'I'm guessing the cards not yours, but sign it anyway'
I wonder what she would have said had I been buying 10 dvd's, or a TV rather than the weekly shop

mrmaggit

10,146 posts

270 months

Sunday 28th June 2009
quotequote all
bigandclever said:
The problem will be that the proper cardholder could just flag the transaction as fraudulent, after all the cardholder wasn't present. The credit company will investigate and require proof from the shop (or whatever) that all appropriate steps were taken to ensure it was a legit transaction. If the shop can't do that, and they haven't got an agreement from their merchant that they can accept CNP transactions, then the shop will be liable for the transaction. So the shop has 2 choices: go with a merchant scheme that will allow them to do CNP transactions; or as a policy refuse them - which sounds like the case here. The 'illegal' bit is still, I think, erroneous but it's a good excuse to tell the customer facing lot.
We get this A LOT, especially by people wanting to pay over the phone for somebody else to collect. It's Company policy to refuse all such transactions. But then, as we can usually deliver locally within 6-9 hours, is it really a problem? To some people it is, they insist that if they OK it, it's all hunky-dory. Well, our bank has informed us, as has been stated above, that we will not be paid if the transaction is queried, and that we may not be paid if all details don't match on telephone sales also.

It's for the customers (and our) protection. How would you feel if your card was used by somebody ordering over the phone and a different party collected the goods? Easy if you think about it. We get two Mr Browns ring up for goods, the ticket is left on the counter, but given to the collector on behalf of the wrong "Mr Brown", we lose on both.

If you time is THAT important, plan your job! Or send your oppo down with the cash or a cheque, that we can accept. Don't blame us for trying to protect you from fraud, and us, for that matter.