Ghost?
Author
Discussion

Mr Sea

Original Poster:

4,724 posts

254 months

Thursday 22nd October 2009
quotequote all
boxedin

taldo

1,357 posts

223 months

Thursday 22nd October 2009
quotequote all
did you take that?

TheEnd

15,370 posts

217 months

Thursday 22nd October 2009
quotequote all
Yep, a class iv free roaming vapour, a real nasty one too

NiceCupOfTea

25,586 posts

280 months

Thursday 22nd October 2009
quotequote all
He slimed me!

taldo

1,357 posts

223 months

Thursday 22nd October 2009
quotequote all
TheEnd said:
Yep, a class iv free roaming vapour, a real nasty one too
who ya gunna call?

Mr Sea

Original Poster:

4,724 posts

254 months

Thursday 22nd October 2009
quotequote all
taldo said:
did you take that?
No, my dad did, 2005.

_Dan_

2,392 posts

308 months

Thursday 22nd October 2009
quotequote all
Why do ghosts have cloths on? Are the Primark/Next/whatever tags still in the cloths?

taldo

1,357 posts

223 months

Thursday 22nd October 2009
quotequote all
Mr Sea said:
taldo said:
did you take that?
No, my dad did, 2005.
forgive my sceptesism, but he appeared to be taking a photo of nothing??? the only focus is the apparant 'ghost' which obviously unless a hoax would not have been there before he took the photo.

unless he took this photo after having seen it? in which case we best call ghost busters!!!

TheEnd

15,370 posts

217 months

Friday 23rd October 2009
quotequote all
Pretty easy to do, set a long exposure, take photo, walk in front, stop, walk back.

done...
same stuff done with light painting

Jem Thompson

930 posts

211 months

Friday 23rd October 2009
quotequote all
TheEnd said:
Pretty easy to do, set a long exposure, take photo, walk in front, stop, walk back.

done...
same stuff done with light painting
Do you mean like when you see the photos of cars at night with the lights stretched out over a large distance? My uncle told me that was done through using a long exposure I think.

sstein

6,249 posts

283 months

Friday 23rd October 2009
quotequote all
No, it's not a ghost.

LukeBird

17,170 posts

238 months

Friday 23rd October 2009
quotequote all
It's a 6 sec exposure, it's just someone that has released the shutter, dashed into the picture and then fked off.

It's ok chaps, mystery solved! wink


Oh and OP you want to clear the EXIF data next time...

TheEnd

15,370 posts

217 months

Friday 23rd October 2009
quotequote all
Jem Thompson said:
TheEnd said:
Pretty easy to do, set a long exposure, take photo, walk in front, stop, walk back.

done...
same stuff done with light painting
Do you mean like when you see the photos of cars at night with the lights stretched out over a large distance? My uncle told me that was done through using a long exposure I think.
yep, that's it basically, except with light painting, you run around with sparklers, torches or lasers and make shapes you want
http://www.yeeta.com/_25_Amazing_Light_Graffiti_Pi...

mybrainhurts

90,809 posts

284 months

Friday 23rd October 2009
quotequote all
WOOOOOOOOO -------->

Famous Graham

26,553 posts

254 months

Friday 23rd October 2009
quotequote all
Double exposure.

SXi Lad

2,964 posts

218 months

Friday 23rd October 2009
quotequote all
mybrainhurts said:
WOOOOOOOOO -------->
rofl

Magog

2,653 posts

218 months

Friday 23rd October 2009
quotequote all
mybrainhurts said:
WOOOOOOOOO -------->
Im pretty certain thats a one way street and that looks like it was taken out of the back window... the mystery deepens!

(eta... maybe not, what car is it?)

Edited by Magog on Friday 23 October 02:01

Distant

2,491 posts

222 months

Friday 23rd October 2009
quotequote all
Magog said:
what car is it?
A Rover KKK-series?






getmecoat

Six Fiend

6,067 posts

244 months

Friday 23rd October 2009
quotequote all
Distant said:
Magog said:
what car is it?
A Rover KKK-series?


getmecoat
rofl

parakitaMol.

11,876 posts

280 months

Friday 23rd October 2009
quotequote all
mybrainhurts said:
WOOOOOOOOO -------->
lol