They Say Sarcasm Is the Lowest Form of Wit...

[st_files]

...but I disagree, I'd say the lowest form of wit was slapstick, closely followed by double entendre.

Edited by st_files on Tuesday 2nd March 17:08

[hornetrider]

Who gives a st? Not fking me.

[boomboompow]

Surely "your monther" jokes are the lowest of low; closely followed by Jim Davidson's standup routine?!

[st_files]

hornetrider said:

Who gives a st? Not fking me.

Oh no.

Really.

Oh no.

Ps I dont give a st that you dont give a st.

Edited by st_files on Tuesday 2nd March 16:52

[zac510]

The pun is getting pretty tired and worn out too.

[hornetrider]

boomboompow said:

Surely "your monther" jokes are the lowest of low; closely followed by Jim Davidson's standup routine?!

What's a monther, ychops?

[James P]

Mime Artists [/patrician]

[deeen]

Yeah, right.

[Justayellowbadge]

st_files said:

closely followed by double entendre.

Agree with that.

If there was a smiley better than a rofl, I'd give you one.

[Dupont666]

st_files said:

...but I disagree, I'd say the lowest form of with was slapstick, closely followed by double entendre.

I thought that the lowest form of wit was correcting peoples crappy spelling and grammar?

[becksW]

It may be the lowest form of wit but it's the highest form of intelligence. That's my reason for using it.

[DrTre]

becksW said:

It may be the lowest form of wit but it's the highest form of intelligence. That's my reason for using it.

Quite, quite brilliant on so many levels.

[singlecoil]

Dupont666 said:

st_files said:

...but I disagree, I'd say the lowest form of with was slapstick, closely followed by double entendre.

I thought that the lowest form of wit was correcting peoples crappy spelling and grammar?

people's. And the question mark was superfluous.

[Dupont666]

singlecoil said:

Dupont666 said:

st_files said:

...but I disagree, I'd say the lowest form of with was slapstick, closely followed by double entendre.

I thought that the lowest form of wit was correcting peoples crappy spelling and grammar?

people's. And the question mark was superfluous.

I only just passed GCSE as Im a bit dyslexic when it comes to English... computer languages not an issue, but english... anyway you get the drift of the point

[hornetrider]

singlecoil said:

Dupont666 said:

st_files said:

...but I disagree, I'd say the lowest form of with was slapstick, closely followed by double entendre.

I thought that the lowest form of wit was correcting peoples crappy spelling and grammar?

people's. And the question mark was superfluous.

Oh dear. Do I need to state the obvious?

I thought not.

[singlecoil]

I think someone's missing the joke here.

[AdeTuono]

Dupont666 said:

I only just passed GCSE as Im a bit dyslexic when it comes to English...

Anyone noticed how every fker's dyslexic these days? We called it 'thick as st' when we were at school.

[Dupont666]

AdeTuono said:

Dupont666 said:

I only just passed GCSE as Im a bit dyslexic when it comes to English...

Anyone noticed how every fker's dyslexic these days? We called it 'thick as st' when we were at school.

Na... just not a literature person, Im a scientist and maths bod... so english other than basic (thank you spell checker on eamils) never interested me as I found that hard, but learning physics and mathematical algorithms were easy...

Edited by Dupont666 on Tuesday 2nd March 17:51

[Justayellowbadge]

Dupont666 said:

AdeTuono said:

Dupont666 said:

I only just passed GCSE as Im a bit dyslexic when it comes to English...

Anyone noticed how every fker's dyslexic these days? We called it 'thick as st' when we were at school.

Na... just not a literature person, Im a scientist and maths bod... so english other than basic (thank you spell checker on eamils) never interested me as I found that hard, but learning physics and mathematical algorithms were easy...

Edited by Dupont666 on Tuesday 2nd March 17:51

Not thick, lazy.

That's ok then.

[hornetrider]

singlecoil said:

I think someone's missing the joke here.

Nice try Paolo.