Barely Legal Porn - DONT GET YOUR HOPES UP!
Discussion
Pornos that are 'barely legal' by virtue that the prostitutes (cos that is what they are) in the film are only just over 18, some even claim that they made the film on their 18th birthday.
Any film with an 18 year old in is going to be the same, whether it's classified as a normal porno, a 18 year old specific porno, or a 'barely legal' porno, but though the girls and content will be the same, the marketing is going to attract different clients...
Normal porno with 18 year girl: bought by people who like porn who are fussed if she's 18, 19, 23, 39 as long as she has a nice rack n doesnt pull wierd sex faces
18 year old porn: bought by people who like younger women
barely legal porn: bought by people who like the 'almost illegal' aspect of it, concentrating on the fact that it's naughty cos she's sooooo close to being under age.
It makes me wonder where the 'barely legal' fans would draw the line.
I'm implying that they get off on the legality, and if 'barely legal' is somehow good, then surely 'slightly illegal' must be better?
And where would they draw the line? What if some country had porno laws saying that 16 year olds can do sex videos... would a legal 16 year old be enough, or would they be desiring a 'barely legal' 16 year old.... or a 'slightly illegal' 15 year old.
I'm OK, I prefer MILFs.
Any film with an 18 year old in is going to be the same, whether it's classified as a normal porno, a 18 year old specific porno, or a 'barely legal' porno, but though the girls and content will be the same, the marketing is going to attract different clients...
Normal porno with 18 year girl: bought by people who like porn who are fussed if she's 18, 19, 23, 39 as long as she has a nice rack n doesnt pull wierd sex faces
18 year old porn: bought by people who like younger women
barely legal porn: bought by people who like the 'almost illegal' aspect of it, concentrating on the fact that it's naughty cos she's sooooo close to being under age.
It makes me wonder where the 'barely legal' fans would draw the line.
I'm implying that they get off on the legality, and if 'barely legal' is somehow good, then surely 'slightly illegal' must be better?
And where would they draw the line? What if some country had porno laws saying that 16 year olds can do sex videos... would a legal 16 year old be enough, or would they be desiring a 'barely legal' 16 year old.... or a 'slightly illegal' 15 year old.
I'm OK, I prefer MILFs.
Conian said:
Pornos that are 'barely legal' by virtue that the prostitutes (cos that is what they are) in the film are only just over 18, some even claim that they made the film on their 18th birthday.
Any film with an 18 year old in is going to be the same, whether it's classified as a normal porno, a 18 year old specific porno, or a 'barely legal' porno, but though the girls and content will be the same, the marketing is going to attract different clients...
Normal porno with 18 year girl: bought by people who like porn who are fussed if she's 18, 19, 23, 39 as long as she has a nice rack n doesnt pull wierd sex faces
18 year old porn: bought by people who like younger women
barely legal porn: bought by people who like the 'almost illegal' aspect of it, concentrating on the fact that it's naughty cos she's sooooo close to being under age.
It makes me wonder where the 'barely legal' fans would draw the line.
I'm implying that they get off on the legality, and if 'barely legal' is somehow good, then surely 'slightly illegal' must be better?
And where would they draw the line? What if some country had porno laws saying that 16 year olds can do sex videos... would a legal 16 year old be enough, or would they be desiring a 'barely legal' 16 year old.... or a 'slightly illegal' 15 year old.
I'm OK, I prefer MILFs.
I think you should get out more.. Any film with an 18 year old in is going to be the same, whether it's classified as a normal porno, a 18 year old specific porno, or a 'barely legal' porno, but though the girls and content will be the same, the marketing is going to attract different clients...
Normal porno with 18 year girl: bought by people who like porn who are fussed if she's 18, 19, 23, 39 as long as she has a nice rack n doesnt pull wierd sex faces
18 year old porn: bought by people who like younger women
barely legal porn: bought by people who like the 'almost illegal' aspect of it, concentrating on the fact that it's naughty cos she's sooooo close to being under age.
It makes me wonder where the 'barely legal' fans would draw the line.
I'm implying that they get off on the legality, and if 'barely legal' is somehow good, then surely 'slightly illegal' must be better?
And where would they draw the line? What if some country had porno laws saying that 16 year olds can do sex videos... would a legal 16 year old be enough, or would they be desiring a 'barely legal' 16 year old.... or a 'slightly illegal' 15 year old.
I'm OK, I prefer MILFs.
Edited by The Loose Goose on Friday 2nd April 23:01
hahaha good responses, to answer a few
didnt download any porn, but i do find porn film names funny, if i see a funny one, i click to have a look, comments are also worth a peek at, much like being in here
point of this thread is to see if anyone else has thoughts on it and to see what funniness comes out of it, porn on PH is always a good talking point
anyway I'm not a perv for looking at the torrent, i have sex addiction, it's real, ask tiger woods. f
k it, i'm off to therapy 
didnt download any porn, but i do find porn film names funny, if i see a funny one, i click to have a look, comments are also worth a peek at, much like being in here
point of this thread is to see if anyone else has thoughts on it and to see what funniness comes out of it, porn on PH is always a good talking point
anyway I'm not a perv for looking at the torrent, i have sex addiction, it's real, ask tiger woods. f
k it, i'm off to therapy Gassing Station | The Lounge | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff