boeing dreamliner

[jesta1865]

sorry search is not working so apologies if its a repo.

anyway i was reading this http://uk.travel.yahoo.com/p-promo-3312516

and found this at the bottom.

'Russia is reportedly pressing Boeing to deliver 787s to the state-run airline Aeroflot in time for the 2014 Olympics. '

i seem to be missing something, when did they go every 2 years, or are they just assuming the London games will be so pants they will need to fix their reputation in 2 years

[dougc]

Winter Olympics

[chrismcg1]

....always worth Googling these things first me thinks.......

[Justayellowbadge]

It's winter you 'tard.

[Cock Womble 7]

A new Ambwilans/Original Poster is born.

[elster]

jesta1865 said:

i seem to be missing something

You hit the nail on the head there.

Intelligence being 1.

Edited by elster on Monday 19th July 16:38

[davido140]

this could be good!

[Paul_Dids]

Justayellowbadge said:

It's winter you 'tard.

Harsh but fair

[jesta1865]

at the risk of being ridiculed further, i guessed as much, i was taking the rip as it wasn't explained in the article, and someone here in the office said exactly what i was thinking they would about it only being 2 years.

hence my comments about the london games being pants etc and the smileys.

[james_tigerwoods]

jesta1865 said:

sorry search is not working so apologies if its a repo.

anyway i was reading this http://uk.travel.yahoo.com/p-promo-3312516

and found this at the bottom.

'Russia is reportedly pressing Boeing to deliver 787s to the state-run airline Aeroflot in time for the 2014 Olympics. '

i seem to be missing something, when did they go every 2 years, or are they just assuming the London games will be so pants they will need to fix their reputation in 2 years

Had to quote this for posterity

Waits for **this** to become the new 'tard thread

[Cock Womble 7]

jesta1865 said:

at the risk of being ridiculed further, i guessed as much, i was taking the rip as it wasn't explained in the article, and someone here in the office said exactly what i was thinking they would about it only being 2 years.

hence my comments about the london games being pants etc and the smileys.

Good back-pedalling there Sir.

[Robb F]

jesta1865 said:

sorry search is not working so apologies if its a repo.

anyway i was reading this http://uk.travel.yahoo.com/p-promo-3312516

and found this at the bottom.

'Russia is reportedly pressing Boeing to deliver 787s to the state-run airline Aeroflot in time for the 2014 Olympics. '

i seem to be missing something, when did they go every 2 years, or are they just assuming the London games will be so pants they will need to fix their reputation in 2 years

eta: beaten to it!

Edited by Robb F on Monday 19th July 16:41

[Justayellowbadge]

jesta1865 said:

at the risk of being ridiculed further, i guessed as much, i was taking the rip as it wasn't explained in the article, and someone here in the office said exactly what i was thinking they would about it only being 2 years.

hence my comments about the london games being pants etc and the smileys.

Dear Jesta,

rightio, that makes perfect sense.

Thanks for clearing it up.

Chinny. Chinny reckon.

Love,

Jimmy Hill.

[dougc]

jesta1865 said:

at the risk of being ridiculed further, i guessed as much, i was taking the rip as it wasn't explained in the article, and someone here in the office said exactly what i was thinking they would about it only being 2 years.

hence my comments about the london games being pants etc and the smileys.

A save to make Robert Green proud....

[rich1231]

jesta1865 said:

at the risk of being ridiculed further, i guessed as much, i was taking the rip as it wasn't explained in the article, and someone here in the office said exactly what i was thinking they would about it only being 2 years.

hence my comments about the london games being pants etc and the smileys.

You guessed as much but still clicked on "Submit" on the post that flagged you for eternity as a cretin? Well played.

[jesta1865]

rich1231 said:

jesta1865 said:

at the risk of being ridiculed further, i guessed as much, i was taking the rip as it wasn't explained in the article, and someone here in the office said exactly what i was thinking they would about it only being 2 years.

hence my comments about the london games being pants etc and the smileys.

You guessed as much but still clicked on "Submit" on the post that flagged you for eternity as a cretin? Well played.

i posted it the lounge for exactly that reason, it was meant to be ironic.

[rich1231]

jesta1865 said:

rich1231 said:

jesta1865 said:

at the risk of being ridiculed further, i guessed as much, i was taking the rip as it wasn't explained in the article, and someone here in the office said exactly what i was thinking they would about it only being 2 years.

hence my comments about the london games being pants etc and the smileys.

You guessed as much but still clicked on "Submit" on the post that flagged you for eternity as a cretin? Well played.

i posted it the lounge for exactly that reason, it was meant to be ironic.

Don't believe you.

[Cock Womble 7]

jesta1865 said:

it wasn't explained in the article

The article that was predominantly about sales of the actual aircraft and nothing to do with the Olympics, be they Winter or Summer?

That article?

[C8PPO]

Cock Womble 7 said:

jesta1865 said:

at the risk of being ridiculed further, i guessed as much, i was taking the rip as it wasn't explained in the article, and someone here in the office said exactly what i was thinking they would about it only being 2 years.

hence my comments about the london games being pants etc and the smileys.

Good back-pedalling there Sir.

Not quite good enough though.

[james_tigerwoods]

C8PPO said:

Cock Womble 7 said:

jesta1865 said:

at the risk of being ridiculed further, i guessed as much, i was taking the rip as it wasn't explained in the article, and someone here in the office said exactly what i was thinking they would about it only being 2 years.

hence my comments about the london games being pants etc and the smileys.

Good back-pedalling there Sir.

Not quite good enough though.

It didn't work for me...