80/20 in meetings
Author
Discussion

stigmundfreud

Original Poster:

22,454 posts

241 months

Thursday 2nd September 2010
quotequote all
Tend to avoid the bullst bingo lingo that goes on in meetings but recently at work we've had an influx of contractor PM's. As a result of this influx we get trends in phrases, the current trend being 80/20. Effectively everything is always 80% of one thing 20% of the other. Its a constant split and the phrase 80/20 is always brought out.

Where did this originate from? Is there someone that can be held accountable and shot?

Urban Sports

11,321 posts

234 months

Thursday 2nd September 2010
quotequote all
Pareto's Law?????

Flintstone

8,644 posts

278 months

Thursday 2nd September 2010
quotequote all
How people put up with this st without asking them to stop is beyond me.

amirzed

1,789 posts

207 months

Thursday 2nd September 2010
quotequote all
pareto optimality?

don't think that's related to 80/20 in any is it?

Liszt

4,337 posts

301 months

Thursday 2nd September 2010
quotequote all
Urban Sports said:
Pareto's Law?????
What he said. Google it.

Romanymagic

3,298 posts

250 months

Thursday 2nd September 2010
quotequote all
Its amazing how quickly 50/50 has been replaced...

stigmundfreud

Original Poster:

22,454 posts

241 months

Thursday 2nd September 2010
quotequote all
Flintstone said:
How people put up with this st without asking them to stop is beyond me.
well I have made a pledge to myself and now to you, in the next meeting someone trotts this st out I will ask them for some gant charts to highlight the 80/20 split then call bks on it

stigmundfreud

Original Poster:

22,454 posts

241 months

Thursday 2nd September 2010
quotequote all
Liszt said:
Urban Sports said:
Pareto's Law?????
What he said. Google it.
oh and MOSCOW?

Its a rot of st thats flooded in with the latest band of graduates and buzz word fed contractors. Burns' Law states its all bullst

bogwoppit

705 posts

212 months

Thursday 2nd September 2010
quotequote all
It's complete bks. It's clearly more like 83/17.

stigmundfreud

Original Poster:

22,454 posts

241 months

Thursday 2nd September 2010
quotequote all
bogwoppit said:
It's complete bks. It's clearly more like 83/17.
Statistically that is more accurate

Flintstone

8,644 posts

278 months

Thursday 2nd September 2010
quotequote all
stigmundfreud said:
Flintstone said:
How people put up with this st without asking them to stop is beyond me.
well I have made a pledge to myself and now to you, in the next meeting someone trotts this st out I will ask them for some gant charts to highlight the 80/20 split then call bks on it
Do report back won't you? biggrin

Plotloss

67,280 posts

301 months

Thursday 2nd September 2010
quotequote all
Simply suggest that 80/20 is an outmoded way of thinking in bleeding edge project management circles and that you, as an organisation should be aiming for the 'golden ratio'


stigmundfreud

Original Poster:

22,454 posts

241 months

Thursday 2nd September 2010
quotequote all
Flintstone said:
stigmundfreud said:
Flintstone said:
How people put up with this st without asking them to stop is beyond me.
well I have made a pledge to myself and now to you, in the next meeting someone trotts this st out I will ask them for some gant charts to highlight the 80/20 split then call bks on it
Do report back won't you? biggrin
Will do, fortunately we have some very experienced members of staff then we have staff that have been at the company for 10+ years as school leavers that have been moulded at the company. These people have zero work experience outside the organisation and as such clasp on to outside trends that get introduced with the transient contractors. The next time I hear 80/20 I will call a stop to the meeting and request that from this point forward we waste time using such bks and concentrate on the core facts, keeping the blue sky clear for out of the box thinking.

Flintstone

8,644 posts

278 months

Thursday 2nd September 2010
quotequote all
stigmundfreud said:
Flintstone said:
stigmundfreud said:
Flintstone said:
How people put up with this st without asking them to stop is beyond me.
well I have made a pledge to myself and now to you, in the next meeting someone trotts this st out I will ask them for some gant charts to highlight the 80/20 split then call bks on it
Do report back won't you? biggrin
Will do, fortunately we have some very experienced members of staff then we have staff that have been at the company for 10+ years as school leavers that have been moulded at the company. These people have zero work experience outside the organisation and as such clasp on to outside trends that get introduced with the transient contractors. The next time I hear 80/20 I will call a stop to the meeting and request that from this point forward we waste time using such bks and concentrate on the core facts, keeping the blue sky clear for out of the box thinking.
Will there be any picking of low hanging fruit?

stigmundfreud

Original Poster:

22,454 posts

241 months

Thursday 2nd September 2010
quotequote all
Plotloss said:
Simply suggest that 80/20 is an outmoded way of thinking in bleeding edge project management circles and that you, as an organisation should be aiming for the 'golden ratio'
I'll make a note of this phrase, I feel it may come into use as soon as tomorrow

SeeFive

8,353 posts

264 months

Thursday 2nd September 2010
quotequote all
Romanymagic said:
Its amazing how quickly 50/50 has been replaced...
Ah, 50:50 - it's still there, but these days "it's a light switch innit John".

The one measure that makes me giggle every time is the certain analyst group's "magic quadrant" which seems to have absolutely no bearing whatsoever on the truth of capability, but far more bearing on how long the company has been in business, the state of deployments / organisation in the USA, and (allegedly) how much they have spent with the particular analyst company on reports, reprints and events.

Pesty

42,655 posts

287 months

Thursday 2nd September 2010
quotequote all
stigmundfreud said:
Plotloss said:
Simply suggest that 80/20 is an outmoded way of thinking in bleeding edge project management circles and that you, as an organisation should be aiming for the 'golden ratio'
I'll make a note of this phrase, I feel it may come into use as soon as tomorrow
isnt the golden ratio to do with attractivness

Hips/tits/waist basically the better the ration the fitter the bird? smile

the one pissing me off at my place is "moving forward" if you say it in every fking sentence it makes fk all sense.

Edited by Pesty on Thursday 2nd September 23:55

Flintstone

8,644 posts

278 months

Thursday 2nd September 2010
quotequote all
Hey stigmund. This should keep your piss simmering until tomorrow's meeting. From the 'There Is No God' thread in GG:


tonym911 said:
I agree and made this point earlier in the thread, we don't have the right linguistic ammo to shoot at this target.

stigmundfreud

Original Poster:

22,454 posts

241 months

Friday 3rd September 2010
quotequote all
ah that just makes me smile that stuff. Its "off of" and "80/20" that gets my goat.

Pesty

42,655 posts

287 months

Friday 3rd September 2010
quotequote all
stigmund

I think you need to take a helicopter view of this, drill down and start repurposing rather than blamestorming.