Explain cholesterol to me
Explain cholesterol to me
Author
Discussion

Driller

Original Poster:

8,310 posts

307 months

Monday 11th February 2013
quotequote all
Just had a blood test for cholesterol and my total cholesterol is 2.54g/L with anything higher than 2.00 g/L considered a risk apparently.

However,

My triglycerides are 0.87g/L (should be lower than 1.5 so that's ok)
HDL is 0.78g/L and should be higher than 0.4 so that's ok
LDL is 1.59g/L and should be lower than 1.6

Is this good or bad?

turbolucie

3,473 posts

211 months

Monday 11th February 2013
quotequote all

HDL is the 'good' one so your balance of good/bad is how you'd want it to be.

High triglycerides would be a sign of a familial high cholesterol so you clearly don't have a problem there.

'Risk' in cholesterol is not straightforward. What your GP will do is weigh up your age and other risk factors (smoking, diabetes etc) and calculate the risk of you having a heart attack/stroke over the next 10 years (they have a calculator on their computer which they should show you). If the risk of this is high then they may offer you a statin. I'm not sure about your numbers as I'm used to working in mmol/L but your ratio is good and unless your risk is significantly raised by other factors then I doubt your stats would warrant taking a statin. How old are you?

Edited by turbolucie on Monday 11th February 20:16

Driller

Original Poster:

8,310 posts

307 months

Monday 11th February 2013
quotequote all
In mmol/L:

Triglycerides 0.99
HDL 2.0
LDL 4.09
Total Cholesterol 6.58



Total/HDL ratio= 3.26

Age= 40ish
Never smoked, no diabetes.

Thanks.

turbolucie

3,473 posts

211 months

Monday 11th February 2013
quotequote all
Have a look at this and put in your details.

http://www.patient.co.uk/doctor/cardiovascular-ris...

If your GP follows you up with your result they will probably do the same (don't hold me to that). They'll probably tell you to bugger off and get your cholesterol tested again in many years' time.

However if it concerns you, you can decrease your cholesterol a little bit by lifestyle changes.

PS. I'm not a doctor.

Driller

Original Poster:

8,310 posts

307 months

Tuesday 12th February 2013
quotequote all
Thanks for the link Lucie.


turbolucie said:
PS. I'm not a doctor.
Now you tell me laugh

Marcellus

7,204 posts

248 months

Tuesday 12th February 2013
quotequote all
turbolucie said:
However if it concerns you, you can decrease your cholesterol a little bit by lifestyle changes.

PS. I'm not a doctor.
errrm not necessarily..... I have been told that with my family history (every blood relative, both paternal and maternal, of previous generations with history of high cholesteral) diet has bugger all to do with and will not effect my scores at all. (which were when diagnosed 9.2 after a year on statins down to 3.4 whcih they're happy with given).

As a result my Children have been reminded to get theirs Checked regularly from an early age.

turbolucie

3,473 posts

211 months

Tuesday 12th February 2013
quotequote all
Marcellus said:
errrm not necessarily..... I have been told that with my family history (every blood relative, both paternal and maternal, of previous generations with history of high cholesteral) diet has bugger all to do with and will not effect my scores at all. (which were when diagnosed 9.2 after a year on statins down to 3.4 whcih they're happy with given).

As a result my Children have been reminded to get theirs Checked regularly from an early age.
I believe (may be wrong) that there is plenty of evidence showing a link between diet and serum cholesterol. For example http://www.nejm.org/doi/pdf/10.1056/NEJM1981010830... .

From what I can see, familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH) doesn't respond to diet, but the OP probably doesn't have FH given his numbers at age 40...

Marcellus

7,204 posts

248 months

Wednesday 13th February 2013
quotequote all
turbolucie said:
I believe (may be wrong) that there is plenty of evidence showing a link between diet and serum cholesterol. For example http://www.nejm.org/doi/pdf/10.1056/NEJM1981010830... .

From what I can see, familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH) doesn't respond to diet, but the OP probably doesn't have FH given his numbers at age 40...
That was why I said that "Changes to diet and lifestyle" doesn't necessarily change a cholesterol issue at all..... when people hear I have high Cholesterol (aged 44, quite fit etc etc) they often say that I must eat crap.... people have a perception that high cholesterol is linked to obesity which is wrong and just beacuse you're skinny doesn't mean you shouldn't get your levels checked at a certain age.

There is a strong arguement for testing of all adults at 30 and 40 to see what's going as it's one of those issues that you are largely unware may exist until it is too late.