Tried a 72 hours Fast..Harder than I thought. Anyone try it?
Tried a 72 hours Fast..Harder than I thought. Anyone try it?
Author
Discussion

robm3

Original Poster:

4,930 posts

253 months

Monday 23rd February 2015
quotequote all
I've been on the 5/2 diet for a month or so now, been great as I've lost around 4kg with no side effects.

Then I got to reading about how a 72 hour Fast allows your body to regenerate certain cells as well as cleanse certain other organs. All seemed perfectly sensible to me and I have no medical conditions sooo...

Wednesday night I finished my meal and started the Fast (still drinking fluids though, only water and green tea).

Thursday was a little hungry but as I'd been doing the 5/2 this was no bother at all.

Friday morning and afternoon I started to feel slightly more hungry but still no real issue.

Friday afternoon the changes started to occur, started to feel a little irritable and tired.

Friday night started to feel lightheaded, not hungry but just lay on the couch most of the evening, went to bed at 10pm.

1am Saturday I woke up in a bad way, feeling extremely dizzy, my skin felt greasy and smelly, had no energy and couldn't focus. Starting to think this was a dumb idea so broke the Fast and had some fruit (that I'd put aside for this very reason). Also had a bath. Then fell asleep on the sofa as couldn't be arsed to get back to bed. Lastly was feeling very grumpy

By Saturday afternoon I was feeling fine, in fact I felt pretty good.

Then I read people do 5, 7 and more days. Well fair play to them because I couldn't get to 3 days!

My wife reckons I was starting to detox and the symptons were all the rubbish coming out but in truth I have no idea. I suspect it was the Ketosis stage kicking in.

Anyone else tried to do longer Fasts?
Any tips?


Brother D

4,380 posts

202 months

Monday 23rd February 2015
quotequote all
I managed 5 days on just drinks. It was however in a hot country which I think helps. Only drawback was like you I felt dizzy but wasn't particularly hungry (never really am) so decided to have a meal with mates as any longer without food I thought would be detrimental. Unfortunately a large place of chicken and chips wasn't the best idea and I threw up at the restaurant... so if you do go a long time not eating makes sure you have small portion so to start with on re commencing...

StangGT

3,945 posts

295 months

Monday 23rd February 2015
quotequote all
Is this genuinely good for you? Not trolling, just interested ...

grumbledoak

32,466 posts

259 months

Monday 23rd February 2015
quotequote all
StangGT said:
Is this genuinely good for you? Not trolling, just interested ...
If you are permanently stuffing your face with crisps and sweets then stopping is better than eating more of them, but generally 'Detox' is fashionable bks. Your liver and kidneys are doing it 24x7 and they get a vacation when you die and not before.

As to whether fasting is actually good for you? I suspect that "a bit of discomfort being good for you" is one of those rubbish inverted logic theories, like Puritanism. But it cannot be that bad for you either - you do it between meals and overnight anyway. And at the other extreme you have the same basic body as bears that hibernate. Indeed the peasantry used to hibernate when there simply wasn't enough food to move about much!

Hoofy

79,724 posts

308 months

Monday 23rd February 2015
quotequote all
Wot e sed! Anyone over the age of 15 and not female should know that detoxes and cleanses are stupid concepts as the body is set up to do that. Like when you eat raw chicken, your body goes into automatic detox mode. wink

robm3

Original Poster:

4,930 posts

253 months

Monday 23rd February 2015
quotequote all

Rayy

131 posts

167 months

Monday 23rd February 2015
quotequote all
'nuff respect. I am currently on 5:2 diet and find the hunger pangs enough to cope with.

Rayy

131 posts

167 months

Monday 23rd February 2015
quotequote all
'nuff respect. I am currently on 5:2 diet and find the hunger pangs enough to cope with.

Hoofy

79,724 posts

308 months

Monday 23rd February 2015
quotequote all
robm3 said:
'Course, you know how you can stop ruining your immune system? Sleep more and eat less st.

vanordinaire

3,701 posts

188 months

Monday 23rd February 2015
quotequote all
I've been on a 'sort of' 5/2 since Christmas,eating only fresh fruit and veg on Tuesdays and Thursdays. last week I stretched the 'fast' days to Wednesday as well. Absolutely no trouble at all, the fruit seems to help by filling my stomach. I'm planning on doing the same for a few weeks more. I've gone from 20.5 stone at Christmas to 18.5 today. I plan to reach and stop at around 16 stone by summer.

smiffy180

6,029 posts

176 months

Monday 23rd February 2015
quotequote all
I did it once (fasted 72hrs)........ but I was on a drip awaiting a operation tongue out

Pothole

34,367 posts

308 months

Monday 23rd February 2015
quotequote all
Hoofy said:
robm3 said:
'Course, you know how you can stop ruining your immune system? Sleep more and eat less st.
Science actually said:
cycles of prolonged fasting...periods of no food for two to four days at a time over the course of six months
The piece also makes it sound as though this Longo character is just finding data to fit his agenda and back up earlier "findings"

"Prolonged fasting forces the body to use stores of glucose, fat and ketones, but it also breaks down a significant portion of white blood cells. Longo likens the effect to lightening a plane of excess cargo.

During each cycle of fasting, this depletion of white blood cells induces changes that trigger stem cell-based regeneration of new immune system cells. In particular, prolonged fasting reduced the enzyme PKA, an effect previously discovered by the Longo team to extend longevity in simple organisms and which has been linked in other research to the regulation of stem cell self-renewal and pluripotency — that is, the potential for one cell to develop into many different cell types. Prolonged fasting also lowered levels of IGF-1, a growth-factor hormone that Longo and others have linked to aging, tumor progression and cancer risk."

Brother D

4,380 posts

202 months

Monday 23rd February 2015
quotequote all
StangGT said:
Is this genuinely good for you? Not trolling, just interested ...
I need to add the 5 days thing that was a one-time personal 'test'. I do the 5:2 fairly regularly, anything longer than 2 days without food is too disruptive to personal and work life (I'm a mardy bd at the best of times)

Hoofy

79,724 posts

308 months

Monday 23rd February 2015
quotequote all
What science won't tell you is that the last 3 hours will be spent in a police cell because you've just killed someone who didn't move out of your way quickly enough. biggrin

amare32

2,419 posts

249 months

Tuesday 24th February 2015
quotequote all
Is this handbags.com?

Fasting are for women..

Seriously, provided that you are exercising the right amount, eat a healthy balanced diet and rest well then there's no need to deprive yourself of food for 72 hours.

Vocal Minority

8,582 posts

178 months

Tuesday 24th February 2015
quotequote all
It does sound like a slightly pointless exercise to me I am afraid!

ruggedscotty

5,967 posts

235 months

Tuesday 24th February 2015
quotequote all
On a lighter life style diet just now and its hard -

Limited food - basically food packs to trigger ketosis and this burns fat and helps you lose weight - can lose quite a bit of weight but it is difficult for the first three days.... body needs to adjust and it is a bit of a shock - but once over the transition its okay. Only side effect is horrendous breath with the keytones.

be careful with the fasting as it will affect your blood sugars

LordGrover

34,117 posts

238 months

Wednesday 25th February 2015
quotequote all
I doubt short spells of fasting are harmful. Most creatures have to endure hardship and deprivation as a matter of course, it's even likely that it may be beneficial. If a few days without food made us too weak to chase down prey or forage for fruit and nuts we probably wouldn't be here. More likely it sharpens senses and reactions to get over the hump. hehe

probedb

824 posts

245 months

Wednesday 25th February 2015
quotequote all
LordGrover said:
it's even likely that it may be beneficial.
Any evidence of this? As in scientific proof that it's beneficial.

LordGrover

34,117 posts

238 months

Wednesday 25th February 2015
quotequote all
probedb said:
Any evidence of this? As in scientific proof that it's beneficial.
Not that I know of or care about.
It just seems sensible that before we got all civilized and stuff there would've been the odd day or week when food was scarce. If we went into meltdown and weak as kittens we'd be unable to find/source fuel/nutrition so it's more likely to me we'd actually get better vision and reflexes to find/catch the scarce food.
I expect we can find 'studies' proving either viewpoint and several in between. hehe